Ae R Kim, Jeong H Hong, Seieun Oh, Sangwoon Cho, Hye J Baek
{"title":"Experiences With a Substitution System for Clinical Nurses' Leave of Absence: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Ae R Kim, Jeong H Hong, Seieun Oh, Sangwoon Cho, Hye J Baek","doi":"10.1002/nur.22427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Insufficient staffing often makes it difficult for nurses in South Korea to adjust their schedules when they have illnesses or other health problems, resulting in presenteeism. This study aimed to explore the experiences of the Acknowledged Care Expert (ACE) team as a substitution system for clinical nurses taking leave because of illness or health problems from the perspectives of ACE nurses, nurse managers, and shift nurses. We collected data for this qualitative study through individual in-depth interviews with six ACE nurses, a focus group interview with five nurse managers, and two focus group interviews with five nurses who shared their experiences with the ACE team. Thematic analysis of the data identified the following four themes: expected and unexpected benefits of the ACE team; challenges in operating the ACE team; characteristics and competencies required of the ACE team; and recommendations for the ACE program. The findings showed that the ACE team was highly valued and received positive feedback from colleagues and administrators with whom they worked. Such positive impacts were made possible by team members' clinical expertise and the collective engagement of both coworkers and team members. Further research to evaluate such substitute systems is necessary to establish a more stable and encouraging environment for clinical nurses, as well as for patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":54492,"journal":{"name":"Research in Nursing & Health","volume":" ","pages":"63-72"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Nursing & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.22427","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Insufficient staffing often makes it difficult for nurses in South Korea to adjust their schedules when they have illnesses or other health problems, resulting in presenteeism. This study aimed to explore the experiences of the Acknowledged Care Expert (ACE) team as a substitution system for clinical nurses taking leave because of illness or health problems from the perspectives of ACE nurses, nurse managers, and shift nurses. We collected data for this qualitative study through individual in-depth interviews with six ACE nurses, a focus group interview with five nurse managers, and two focus group interviews with five nurses who shared their experiences with the ACE team. Thematic analysis of the data identified the following four themes: expected and unexpected benefits of the ACE team; challenges in operating the ACE team; characteristics and competencies required of the ACE team; and recommendations for the ACE program. The findings showed that the ACE team was highly valued and received positive feedback from colleagues and administrators with whom they worked. Such positive impacts were made possible by team members' clinical expertise and the collective engagement of both coworkers and team members. Further research to evaluate such substitute systems is necessary to establish a more stable and encouraging environment for clinical nurses, as well as for patient care.
期刊介绍:
Research in Nursing & Health ( RINAH ) is a peer-reviewed general research journal devoted to publication of a wide range of research that will inform the practice of nursing and other health disciplines. The editors invite reports of research describing problems and testing interventions related to health phenomena, health care and self-care, clinical organization and administration; and the testing of research findings in practice. Research protocols are considered if funded in a peer-reviewed process by an agency external to the authors’ home institution and if the work is in progress. Papers on research methods and techniques are appropriate if they go beyond what is already generally available in the literature and include description of successful use of the method. Theory papers are accepted if each proposition is supported by research evidence. Systematic reviews of the literature are reviewed if PRISMA guidelines are followed. Letters to the editor commenting on published articles are welcome.