{"title":"Modifiable Risk Factors for Cognitive Frailty in Older Chinese Patients With Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Wenhui Qiu, Yixiong Zhang","doi":"10.1002/nur.22428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis clarifying potential modifiable risk factors for cognitive frailty in older Chinese persons with diabetes. We conducted a comprehensive search across four English and four Chinese databases, spanning from 1980 to May 2024. The aim was to identify studies that investigate potential modifiable risk factors for cognitive frailty in older patients with diabetes. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata16.0. Out of the 237 records identified, 19 studies met the inclusion criteria and were consequently included for analysis. The results of the meta-analysis revealed that the prevalence of cognitive frailty among older patients with diabetes was 22.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.177-0.270, I<sup>2</sup> = 93.92%). Depression (OR = 3.18, 95% CI: 2.19-4.62, I<sup>2</sup> = 79.6%), HbA1c (OR = 2.18, 95% CI: 1.66-2.85, I<sup>2</sup> = 41.5%) and malnutrition (OR = 4.04, 95% CI: 1.58-10.34, I<sup>2</sup> = 95.0%) were significantly associated with cognitive frailty in this population. Regular exercise (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.11-0.84, p < 0.01, I<sup>2</sup> = 87.3%) and higher education (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.16-0.58, p < 0.01, I<sup>2</sup> = 69.7%) are identified as protective factors against cognitive frailty. This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that interventions targeting depression, HbA1c level, malnutrition, exercise and education can effectively reduce the risk of cognitive frailty in older patients with diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":54492,"journal":{"name":"Research in Nursing & Health","volume":" ","pages":"73-84"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Nursing & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.22428","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis clarifying potential modifiable risk factors for cognitive frailty in older Chinese persons with diabetes. We conducted a comprehensive search across four English and four Chinese databases, spanning from 1980 to May 2024. The aim was to identify studies that investigate potential modifiable risk factors for cognitive frailty in older patients with diabetes. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata16.0. Out of the 237 records identified, 19 studies met the inclusion criteria and were consequently included for analysis. The results of the meta-analysis revealed that the prevalence of cognitive frailty among older patients with diabetes was 22.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.177-0.270, I2 = 93.92%). Depression (OR = 3.18, 95% CI: 2.19-4.62, I2 = 79.6%), HbA1c (OR = 2.18, 95% CI: 1.66-2.85, I2 = 41.5%) and malnutrition (OR = 4.04, 95% CI: 1.58-10.34, I2 = 95.0%) were significantly associated with cognitive frailty in this population. Regular exercise (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.11-0.84, p < 0.01, I2 = 87.3%) and higher education (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.16-0.58, p < 0.01, I2 = 69.7%) are identified as protective factors against cognitive frailty. This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that interventions targeting depression, HbA1c level, malnutrition, exercise and education can effectively reduce the risk of cognitive frailty in older patients with diabetes.
期刊介绍:
Research in Nursing & Health ( RINAH ) is a peer-reviewed general research journal devoted to publication of a wide range of research that will inform the practice of nursing and other health disciplines. The editors invite reports of research describing problems and testing interventions related to health phenomena, health care and self-care, clinical organization and administration; and the testing of research findings in practice. Research protocols are considered if funded in a peer-reviewed process by an agency external to the authors’ home institution and if the work is in progress. Papers on research methods and techniques are appropriate if they go beyond what is already generally available in the literature and include description of successful use of the method. Theory papers are accepted if each proposition is supported by research evidence. Systematic reviews of the literature are reviewed if PRISMA guidelines are followed. Letters to the editor commenting on published articles are welcome.