Predictive value of MRI for identifying symptomatic neurovascular compressions in classical trigeminal neuralgia: a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY BMC Neurology Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1186/s12883-024-03977-6
Wei Zhao, Changyou Yin, Lei Ma, Mingzeng Ding, Wei Kong, Yanbin Wang
{"title":"Predictive value of MRI for identifying symptomatic neurovascular compressions in classical trigeminal neuralgia: a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.","authors":"Wei Zhao, Changyou Yin, Lei Ma, Mingzeng Ding, Wei Kong, Yanbin Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12883-024-03977-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with trigeminal neuralgia frequently undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) prior to surgery. In patients without the signs and symptoms of face discomfort, MRI has shown the presence of neurovascular contact (NVC) in humans. Therefore, its capacity to accurately exclude NVC of the trigeminal nerve is not properly understood. A meta-analysis of the literature satisfied the criteria to further explore the value of MRI for the diagnosis of classical trigeminal neuralgia (CTN).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>The association between the symptomatic and asymptomatic trigeminal nerves, NVC, root entry zone (REZ), non-REZ, and anatomical variation was measured by a comprehensive review and meta-analysis of 13 observational studies using MRI for CTN neurovascular compression diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of MRI in detecting the neurovascular compression that causes symptoms in individuals with classic trigeminal neuralgia.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This study was conducted at the Department of Neurosurgery, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Qingdao University.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Digital searches of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were performed to identify studies published until December 31, 2023. The following were evaluated: (1) MRI evidence of NVC in symptomatic and asymptomatic trigeminal nerves; (2) MRI indication of NVC at the REZ in symptomatic and asymptomatic trigeminal nerves; (3) MRI substantiation of non-REZ neurovascular contact in patients with CTN; and (4) asymptomatic and symptomatic anatomical changes at the NVC site of the trigeminal nerves. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the fixed effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 13 observational studies (1 prospective and 12 retrospective studies) with data collected from 1770 nerves (728 symptomatic and 1042 asymptomatic) were meta-analyzed. First, MRI of 649/728 (88.2%) symptomatic versus 378/1042 (36.3%) asymptomatic trigeminal nerves revealed marked differences in NVC in the REZ (OR = 16.3; CI 95%=12.2-21.8; p < 0.00001). Second, pooled data showed that REZ NVC was detected in 206/262 (78.6%) symptomatic and in 129/340 (37.9%) asymptomatic nerves (OR = 5.0; CI 95% = 3.4-7.3; p < 0.00001); Third, no significant differences were detected between 44/267 (16.5%) symptomatic and 23/189 (12.1%) asymptomatic nerves on MRI examination of NVC in the NON-REZ (OR = 0.9; CI 95% 0.5-1.6) (p = 0.77); Finally, MRI revealed marked differences in 302/567 (53.2%) symptomatic and 73/919 (7.9%) asymptomatic anatomic changes (atrophy, dislocation, distorsion, flattening or indentation) at the NVC site of the trigeminal segments (OR = 11.9; CI 95% = 8.8-16.2; p < 0.00001).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Despite the systematic evaluation of 13 observational studies, large-scale randomized controlled trials should be conducted, focusing on the specificity of MRI for the diagnosis of trigeminal neuralgia and evaluating the specificity of the imaging findings and the impact of the patient's postoperative treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A previous meta-analysis showed that patients with CTN were more likely to have NVC-specific anatomical changes. MRI of patients with CTN can detect anatomical changes in the REZ NVC with higher sensitivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":9170,"journal":{"name":"BMC Neurology","volume":"24 1","pages":"466"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11606272/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-024-03977-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with trigeminal neuralgia frequently undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) prior to surgery. In patients without the signs and symptoms of face discomfort, MRI has shown the presence of neurovascular contact (NVC) in humans. Therefore, its capacity to accurately exclude NVC of the trigeminal nerve is not properly understood. A meta-analysis of the literature satisfied the criteria to further explore the value of MRI for the diagnosis of classical trigeminal neuralgia (CTN).

Study design: The association between the symptomatic and asymptomatic trigeminal nerves, NVC, root entry zone (REZ), non-REZ, and anatomical variation was measured by a comprehensive review and meta-analysis of 13 observational studies using MRI for CTN neurovascular compression diagnosis.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of MRI in detecting the neurovascular compression that causes symptoms in individuals with classic trigeminal neuralgia.

Setting: This study was conducted at the Department of Neurosurgery, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Qingdao University.

Methods: Digital searches of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were performed to identify studies published until December 31, 2023. The following were evaluated: (1) MRI evidence of NVC in symptomatic and asymptomatic trigeminal nerves; (2) MRI indication of NVC at the REZ in symptomatic and asymptomatic trigeminal nerves; (3) MRI substantiation of non-REZ neurovascular contact in patients with CTN; and (4) asymptomatic and symptomatic anatomical changes at the NVC site of the trigeminal nerves. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the fixed effects models.

Results: We identified 13 observational studies (1 prospective and 12 retrospective studies) with data collected from 1770 nerves (728 symptomatic and 1042 asymptomatic) were meta-analyzed. First, MRI of 649/728 (88.2%) symptomatic versus 378/1042 (36.3%) asymptomatic trigeminal nerves revealed marked differences in NVC in the REZ (OR = 16.3; CI 95%=12.2-21.8; p < 0.00001). Second, pooled data showed that REZ NVC was detected in 206/262 (78.6%) symptomatic and in 129/340 (37.9%) asymptomatic nerves (OR = 5.0; CI 95% = 3.4-7.3; p < 0.00001); Third, no significant differences were detected between 44/267 (16.5%) symptomatic and 23/189 (12.1%) asymptomatic nerves on MRI examination of NVC in the NON-REZ (OR = 0.9; CI 95% 0.5-1.6) (p = 0.77); Finally, MRI revealed marked differences in 302/567 (53.2%) symptomatic and 73/919 (7.9%) asymptomatic anatomic changes (atrophy, dislocation, distorsion, flattening or indentation) at the NVC site of the trigeminal segments (OR = 11.9; CI 95% = 8.8-16.2; p < 0.00001).

Limitations: Despite the systematic evaluation of 13 observational studies, large-scale randomized controlled trials should be conducted, focusing on the specificity of MRI for the diagnosis of trigeminal neuralgia and evaluating the specificity of the imaging findings and the impact of the patient's postoperative treatment.

Conclusions: A previous meta-analysis showed that patients with CTN were more likely to have NVC-specific anatomical changes. MRI of patients with CTN can detect anatomical changes in the REZ NVC with higher sensitivity.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MRI对经典三叉神经痛症状性神经血管压迫的预测价值:符合prisma标准的meta分析
背景:三叉神经痛患者在手术前经常接受磁共振成像(MRI)检查。在没有面部不适体征和症状的患者中,MRI显示人类存在神经血管接触(NVC)。因此,其准确排除三叉神经NVC的能力尚不清楚。对符合标准的文献进行荟萃分析,进一步探讨MRI对经典三叉神经痛(CTN)的诊断价值。研究设计:通过对13项使用MRI诊断CTN神经血管压迫的观察性研究进行综合回顾和meta分析,测量有症状和无症状三叉神经、NVC、根入区(REZ)、非REZ和解剖变异之间的关系。目的:本研究旨在评估MRI在检测引起典型三叉神经痛症状的神经血管压迫方面的有效性。背景:本研究在青岛大学烟台玉皇顶医院神经外科进行。方法:对PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆进行数字检索,以确定2023年12月31日之前发表的研究。评估以下内容:(1)有症状和无症状三叉神经NVC的MRI证据;(2)有症状和无症状三叉神经rec的MRI指征;(3) CTN患者非rez神经血管接触的MRI证实;(4)三叉神经NVC部位的无症状和症状性解剖改变。使用固定效应模型计算95%置信区间(ci)的优势比(ORs)。结果:我们确定了13项观察性研究(1项前瞻性研究和12项回顾性研究),收集了1770条神经(728条有症状神经和1042条无症状神经)的数据进行了meta分析。首先,649/728(88.2%)有症状的三叉神经与378/1042(36.3%)无症状的三叉神经的MRI显示了REZ中NVC的显著差异(OR = 16.3;CI 95% = 12.2 - -21.8;p局限性:尽管对13项观察性研究进行了系统评价,但仍需开展大规模随机对照试验,重点关注MRI对三叉神经痛诊断的特异性,评价影像学表现的特异性及对患者术后治疗的影响。结论:先前的荟萃分析显示,CTN患者更有可能发生nvc特异性解剖改变。CTN患者的MRI能较灵敏地发现REZ NVC的解剖变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Neurology
BMC Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
428
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Neurology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of neurological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Infliximab-associated multifocal central nervous system demyelination mimicking multiple sclerosis in a patient with Crohn's disease: a case report. Co-occurrence of viral encephalitis and autoimmune encephalitis: overlapping peaks encephalitis or coincidence condition? Association between neutrophil percentage-to-albumin ratio and vascular cognitive impairment in patients with cerebrovascular disease: a cross-sectional study. Cryptococcal meningitis in an immunocompetent host: acute bilateral sensorineural hearing loss with normal intracranial pressure. Comparison of the effects of mini-midline catheter placement in the forearm versus upper arm of neurosurgical patients based on propensity score matching.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1