To avoid disconnection or approach connection: Loneliness predicts social robot anthropomorphism via different social motivations in the UK and China

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Personality and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-30 DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2024.112979
Zhuo Feng, Jianning Dang
{"title":"To avoid disconnection or approach connection: Loneliness predicts social robot anthropomorphism via different social motivations in the UK and China","authors":"Zhuo Feng,&nbsp;Jianning Dang","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2024.112979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lonely people are often considered more likely to anthropomorphize social robots than the non-lonely; however, increasing evidence challenges this inference. By distinguishing between avoidance and approach social motivations, this study proposes a dual-pathway model of the association between loneliness and social robot anthropomorphism. According to this model, loneliness predicts robot anthropomorphism positively via high social avoidance motivation but negatively via low social approach motivation. We provided support for this model in 5 studies (2 pre-registered, <em>N</em> = 1575), and found that the positive pathway via avoidance social motivation was more prominent among British participants, whereas the negative pathway via approach social motivation was more prominent among Chinese participants. Varying levels of animism beliefs accounted for these cultural differences. Our findings enhance the current understanding of lonely people's motivational processes and shed light on the distinct social motivational orientations underlying anthropomorphism in different cultural contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"235 ","pages":"Article 112979"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924004392","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lonely people are often considered more likely to anthropomorphize social robots than the non-lonely; however, increasing evidence challenges this inference. By distinguishing between avoidance and approach social motivations, this study proposes a dual-pathway model of the association between loneliness and social robot anthropomorphism. According to this model, loneliness predicts robot anthropomorphism positively via high social avoidance motivation but negatively via low social approach motivation. We provided support for this model in 5 studies (2 pre-registered, N = 1575), and found that the positive pathway via avoidance social motivation was more prominent among British participants, whereas the negative pathway via approach social motivation was more prominent among Chinese participants. Varying levels of animism beliefs accounted for these cultural differences. Our findings enhance the current understanding of lonely people's motivational processes and shed light on the distinct social motivational orientations underlying anthropomorphism in different cultural contexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
避免断开或接近连接:在英国和中国,孤独感通过不同的社会动机预测社交机器人拟人化
孤独的人通常被认为比不孤独的人更有可能将社交机器人拟人化;然而,越来越多的证据挑战了这一推论。通过区分回避和接近社会动机,本研究提出了孤独与社交机器人拟人化之间关系的双途径模型。根据该模型,孤独感通过高社会回避动机正向预测机器人拟人化,通过低社会接近动机负向预测机器人拟人化。我们通过5项研究(2项预注册,N = 1575)对该模型进行了支持,发现英国参与者通过回避社会动机产生的积极路径更为突出,而中国参与者通过接近社会动机产生的消极路径更为突出。不同程度的万物有灵论信仰解释了这些文化差异。我们的研究结果加强了目前对孤独者动机过程的理解,并揭示了不同文化背景下拟人化背后的不同社会动机取向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
期刊最新文献
The vanishing hours: Future temporal focus and the passage of time in the digital era Individual in online polarization: Development of the online polarized aggression scale (OPAS) Mercenary predators: Individual characteristics of gold diggers Narcissistic perfectionism and its psychological and relational costs: Anger control moderates the relations between narcissistic perfectionism and psychological distress and relationship satisfaction Sweet liking predicts learning in the Iowa Gambling Task
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1