Partner selection for supply chain collaboration: New data envelopment analysis models

IF 6.7 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Omega-international Journal of Management Science Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1016/j.omega.2024.103245
Lili Liu , Sheng Ang , Feng Yang , Xiaoqi Zhang
{"title":"Partner selection for supply chain collaboration: New data envelopment analysis models","authors":"Lili Liu ,&nbsp;Sheng Ang ,&nbsp;Feng Yang ,&nbsp;Xiaoqi Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2024.103245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Partner selection is crucial for ensuring successful supply chain collaboration. This study focuses on selecting the best partner for a predefined two-stage supply chain using data envelopment analysis to assess the performance of collaborative systems. We distinguish between two levels of supply chain collaboration: chain-to-chain and stage-to-stage collaboration. The former involves partner selection within the same supply chain across two stages, while the latter allows for selected partners from different supply chains across two stages. We incorporate the technology learning effect and introduce three degrees of collaboration (minor, major, and medium) for both chain and stage collaboration levels. Solutions are provided for each collaboration level and degree, with comparative analysis indicating that major collaboration in stage-to-stage level yields superior performance. A numerical example and a real-world case study are presented to illustrate our models and findings, demonstrating that our approach offers superior benefits and more flexible options compared to existing methods. Thus, the proposed approach not only contributes to advancing theoretical understanding but also provides practical implications for optimizing collaborative relationships within complex multi-stage supply chain environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19529,"journal":{"name":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 103245"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048324002093","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Partner selection is crucial for ensuring successful supply chain collaboration. This study focuses on selecting the best partner for a predefined two-stage supply chain using data envelopment analysis to assess the performance of collaborative systems. We distinguish between two levels of supply chain collaboration: chain-to-chain and stage-to-stage collaboration. The former involves partner selection within the same supply chain across two stages, while the latter allows for selected partners from different supply chains across two stages. We incorporate the technology learning effect and introduce three degrees of collaboration (minor, major, and medium) for both chain and stage collaboration levels. Solutions are provided for each collaboration level and degree, with comparative analysis indicating that major collaboration in stage-to-stage level yields superior performance. A numerical example and a real-world case study are presented to illustrate our models and findings, demonstrating that our approach offers superior benefits and more flexible options compared to existing methods. Thus, the proposed approach not only contributes to advancing theoretical understanding but also provides practical implications for optimizing collaborative relationships within complex multi-stage supply chain environments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
供应链合作伙伴选择:新的数据包络分析模型
合作伙伴的选择对于确保成功的供应链协作至关重要。本研究的重点是选择一个预定义的两阶段供应链的最佳合作伙伴,使用数据包络分析来评估协作系统的性能。我们将供应链协作分为两个层次:链对链协作和阶段对阶段协作。前者涉及跨两个阶段在同一供应链中选择合作伙伴,而后者允许跨两个阶段从不同供应链中选择合作伙伴。我们结合了技术学习效应,并为链和阶段的协作水平引入了三种程度的协作(次要、主要和中等)。为每个协作级别和程度提供了解决方案,通过比较分析表明,阶段到阶段级别的主要协作产生了优越的性能。通过一个数值例子和一个现实世界的案例研究来说明我们的模型和发现,证明我们的方法比现有的方法提供了更好的效益和更灵活的选择。因此,所提出的方法不仅有助于推进理论理解,而且为优化复杂的多阶段供应链环境中的协作关系提供了实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Omega-international Journal of Management Science
Omega-international Journal of Management Science 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
11.60%
发文量
130
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Omega reports on developments in management, including the latest research results and applications. Original contributions and review articles describe the state of the art in specific fields or functions of management, while there are shorter critical assessments of particular management techniques. Other features of the journal are the "Memoranda" section for short communications and "Feedback", a correspondence column. Omega is both stimulating reading and an important source for practising managers, specialists in management services, operational research workers and management scientists, management consultants, academics, students and research personnel throughout the world. The material published is of high quality and relevance, written in a manner which makes it accessible to all of this wide-ranging readership. Preference will be given to papers with implications to the practice of management. Submissions of purely theoretical papers are discouraged. The review of material for publication in the journal reflects this aim.
期刊最新文献
Revenue distribution in streaming Partner selection for supply chain collaboration: New data envelopment analysis models A novel framework for optimizing job rotation schedules across industries Can feature removal benefit the automotive manufacturers amid supply shortages? An analytical investigation Managing manufacturer encroachment and product conflicts in a closed-loop supply chain: The case of information asymmetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1