Survey of mycoplasma infections in cell cultures and a comparison of detection methods

Göran Bölske
{"title":"Survey of mycoplasma infections in cell cultures and a comparison of detection methods","authors":"Göran Bölske","doi":"10.1016/S0176-6724(88)80176-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A total of 1424 cell cultures was assayed for mycoplasmas by microbiological culture and fluorescent DNA staining. Of these cultures, 412 (29%) were infected with mycoplasmas. The most frequently occurring mycoplasma species were <em>Mycoplasma orale</em> (34%), <em>M. hyorhinis</em> (26%), <em>M. arginini</em> (21%), <em>M. fermentans</em> (13%) and <em>Acholeplasma laidlawii</em> (5%). A few isolates each of <em>M. hominis, M. pulmonis</em> and <em>M. bovis</em> were also detected. When detection methods were compared, microbiological culture produced false-negative results for 0.7% (3 of 412) of the infected cell cultures. DNA staining performed directly on the cells was falsely negative in 2.4% (5/207) of the mycoplasma-infected cultures that were compared, DNA staining performed on indicator cells was falsely negative in 3.1% (7/226). False positives appeared in direct DNA-staining in 1.8% (7/386) of the mycoplasma-free cultures and with DNA staining on indicator cells in 0.5% (3/620). For 11% of the cell cultures, the reading of the DNA staining was ambiguous. With DNA staining on indicator cells, 10% of the test results were ambiguous, but by further passage and staining on new indicator cells it was possible to get a definite diagnosis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101291,"journal":{"name":"Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie, Mikrobiologie und Hygiene. Series A: Medical Microbiology, Infectious Diseases, Virology, Parasitology","volume":"269 3","pages":"Pages 331-340"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0176-6724(88)80176-7","citationCount":"97","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie, Mikrobiologie und Hygiene. Series A: Medical Microbiology, Infectious Diseases, Virology, Parasitology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0176672488801767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 97

Abstract

A total of 1424 cell cultures was assayed for mycoplasmas by microbiological culture and fluorescent DNA staining. Of these cultures, 412 (29%) were infected with mycoplasmas. The most frequently occurring mycoplasma species were Mycoplasma orale (34%), M. hyorhinis (26%), M. arginini (21%), M. fermentans (13%) and Acholeplasma laidlawii (5%). A few isolates each of M. hominis, M. pulmonis and M. bovis were also detected. When detection methods were compared, microbiological culture produced false-negative results for 0.7% (3 of 412) of the infected cell cultures. DNA staining performed directly on the cells was falsely negative in 2.4% (5/207) of the mycoplasma-infected cultures that were compared, DNA staining performed on indicator cells was falsely negative in 3.1% (7/226). False positives appeared in direct DNA-staining in 1.8% (7/386) of the mycoplasma-free cultures and with DNA staining on indicator cells in 0.5% (3/620). For 11% of the cell cultures, the reading of the DNA staining was ambiguous. With DNA staining on indicator cells, 10% of the test results were ambiguous, but by further passage and staining on new indicator cells it was possible to get a definite diagnosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
细胞培养支原体感染的调查及检测方法的比较
采用微生物培养和荧光DNA染色对1424个细胞进行支原体检测。在这些培养物中,有412例(29%)感染支原体。最常见的支原体种类为口腔支原体(34%)、嗜酸支原体(26%)、精氨酸支原体(21%)、发酵支原体(13%)和莱氏支原体(5%)。人支原体、肺支原体和牛支原体各检出少量分离株。当检测方法比较时,微生物培养对0.7%(412个中的3个)的感染细胞培养产生假阴性结果。在支原体感染培养物中,直接对细胞进行DNA染色的假阴性率为2.4%(5/207),对指示细胞进行DNA染色的假阴性率为3.1%(7/226)。1.8%(7/386)的无支原体培养物DNA直接染色出现假阳性,0.5%(3/620)的指示细胞DNA染色出现假阳性。对于11%的细胞培养,DNA染色的读数是模糊的。在指示细胞上进行DNA染色,10%的检测结果不明确,但通过进一步传代和在新的指示细胞上进行染色,有可能得到明确的诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Bactec-system in the diagnosis of tuberculosis comparison of a conventional and the radiometric method (Bactec) for culturing, differentiation and susceptibility testing of Mycobacteria GasPak plus versus anaerocult a — two carbon dioxide/hydrogen systems for cultivation of anaerobes Monoclonal antibodies to protein I for serotyping of Neisseria gonorrhoeae: Correlation of serotype with bactericidal activity Genome type analysis of certain adenovirus serotypes of subgenus D Detection and interspecies-transformation of a β-Lactamase-encoding plasmid from Pasteurella haemolytica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1