Cardiac output-guided haemodynamic therapy for patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery: OPTIMISE II randomised clinical trial

The BMJ Pub Date : 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1136/bmj-2024-080439
OPTIMISE II Trial Group
{"title":"Cardiac output-guided haemodynamic therapy for patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery: OPTIMISE II randomised clinical trial","authors":"OPTIMISE II Trial Group","doi":"10.1136/bmj-2024-080439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of a perioperative algorithm for cardiac output-guided haemodynamic therapy in patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery. Design Multicentre randomised controlled trial. Setting Surgical services of 55 hospitals worldwide. Participants 2498 adults aged ≥65 years with an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification of II or greater and undergoing major elective gastrointestinal surgery, recruited between January 2017 and September 2022. Interventions Participants were assigned to minimally invasive cardiac output-guided intravenous fluid therapy with low dose inotrope infusion during and four hours after surgery, or to usual care without cardiac output monitoring. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was postoperative infection within 30 days of randomisation. Safety outcomes were acute cardiac events within 24 hours and 30 days. Secondary outcomes were acute kidney injury within 30 days and mortality within 180 days. Results In 2498 patients (mean age 74 (standard deviation 6) years, 57% women), the primary outcome occurred in 289/1247 (23.2%) intervention patients and 283/1247 (22.7%) usual care patients (adjusted odds ratio 1.03 (95% confidence interval 0.84 to 1.25); P=0.81). Acute cardiac events within 24 hours occurred in 38/1250 (3.0%) intervention patients and 21/1247 (1.7%) usual care patients (adjusted odds ratio 1.82 (1.06 to 3.13); P=0.03). This difference was primarily due to an increased incidence of arrhythmias among intervention patients. Acute cardiac events within 30 days occurred in 85/1249 (6.8%) intervention patients and 79/1247 (6.3%) usual care patients (adjusted odds ratio 1.06 (0.77 to 1.47); P=0.71). Other secondary outcomes did not differ. Conclusions This clinical effectiveness trial in patients undergoing major elective gastrointestinal surgery did not provide evidence that cardiac output-guided intravenous fluid therapy with low dose inotrope infusion could reduce the incidence of postoperative infections. The intervention was associated with an increased incidence of acute cardiac events within 24 hours, in particular tachyarrhythmias. Based on these findings, the routine use of this treatment approach in unselected patients is not recommended. Trial registration ISRCTN Registry [ISRCTN39653756.][1] Deidentified data will be shared with other authenticated researchers for further research and research publications on this topic, but only if they guarantee to preserve the confidentiality of the information requested. Requests for data sharing will be considered by the data sharing committee of the supporting trials unit (Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Queen Mary University of London) in accordance with its data sharing policy. [1]: /external-ref?link_type=ISRCTN&access_num=ISRCTN39653756.","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":"148 5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-080439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of a perioperative algorithm for cardiac output-guided haemodynamic therapy in patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery. Design Multicentre randomised controlled trial. Setting Surgical services of 55 hospitals worldwide. Participants 2498 adults aged ≥65 years with an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification of II or greater and undergoing major elective gastrointestinal surgery, recruited between January 2017 and September 2022. Interventions Participants were assigned to minimally invasive cardiac output-guided intravenous fluid therapy with low dose inotrope infusion during and four hours after surgery, or to usual care without cardiac output monitoring. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was postoperative infection within 30 days of randomisation. Safety outcomes were acute cardiac events within 24 hours and 30 days. Secondary outcomes were acute kidney injury within 30 days and mortality within 180 days. Results In 2498 patients (mean age 74 (standard deviation 6) years, 57% women), the primary outcome occurred in 289/1247 (23.2%) intervention patients and 283/1247 (22.7%) usual care patients (adjusted odds ratio 1.03 (95% confidence interval 0.84 to 1.25); P=0.81). Acute cardiac events within 24 hours occurred in 38/1250 (3.0%) intervention patients and 21/1247 (1.7%) usual care patients (adjusted odds ratio 1.82 (1.06 to 3.13); P=0.03). This difference was primarily due to an increased incidence of arrhythmias among intervention patients. Acute cardiac events within 30 days occurred in 85/1249 (6.8%) intervention patients and 79/1247 (6.3%) usual care patients (adjusted odds ratio 1.06 (0.77 to 1.47); P=0.71). Other secondary outcomes did not differ. Conclusions This clinical effectiveness trial in patients undergoing major elective gastrointestinal surgery did not provide evidence that cardiac output-guided intravenous fluid therapy with low dose inotrope infusion could reduce the incidence of postoperative infections. The intervention was associated with an increased incidence of acute cardiac events within 24 hours, in particular tachyarrhythmias. Based on these findings, the routine use of this treatment approach in unselected patients is not recommended. Trial registration ISRCTN Registry [ISRCTN39653756.][1] Deidentified data will be shared with other authenticated researchers for further research and research publications on this topic, but only if they guarantee to preserve the confidentiality of the information requested. Requests for data sharing will be considered by the data sharing committee of the supporting trials unit (Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Queen Mary University of London) in accordance with its data sharing policy. [1]: /external-ref?link_type=ISRCTN&access_num=ISRCTN39653756.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心输出量引导下的血流动力学治疗在胃肠大手术患者中的应用:OPTIMISE II随机临床试验
目的评价心输出量引导血流动力学治疗在胃肠大手术患者围手术期的临床有效性和安全性。设计多中心随机对照试验。设置全球55家医院的外科服务。参与者2498名年龄≥65岁,美国麻醉医师协会身体状态分类为II或更高,并在2017年1月至2022年9月期间接受重大选择性胃肠道手术的成年人。干预措施:在手术期间和手术后4小时,参与者被分配进行微创心输出量引导下的低剂量肌力静脉输液治疗,或进行无心输出量监测的常规护理。主要结局指标:主要结局为随机分组后30天内的术后感染。安全性指标为24小时内和30天内的急性心脏事件。次要结局是30天内的急性肾损伤和180天内的死亡率。结果在2498例患者中(平均年龄74岁(标准差6),57%为女性),主要结局发生在289/1247(23.2%)干预患者和283/1247(22.7%)常规护理患者中(校正优势比1.03(95%可信区间0.84 ~ 1.25);P = 0.81)。24小时内发生急性心脏事件的干预组患者为38/1250(3.0%),常规护理组患者为21/1247(1.7%)(校正优势比1.82 (1.06 ~ 3.13);P = 0.03)。这种差异主要是由于干预患者心律失常发生率的增加。30天内发生急性心脏事件的干预组为85/1249(6.8%),常规护理组为79/1247(6.3%)(校正优势比1.06 (0.77 ~ 1.47);P = 0.71)。其他次要结果没有差异。结论本临床疗效试验在大择期胃肠手术患者中并未提供证据表明心输出量引导下低剂量肌力输注静脉输液可以降低术后感染的发生率。干预与24小时内急性心脏事件的发生率增加有关,特别是心动过速。基于这些发现,不推荐在未选择的患者中常规使用这种治疗方法。试验注册ISRCTN注册中心[ISRCTN39653756.][5]被识别的数据将与其他经过认证的研究人员共享,用于进一步的研究和关于该主题的研究出版物,但前提是他们保证对所请求的信息保密。数据共享请求将由支持试验单位(伦敦玛丽女王大学实用临床试验单位)的数据共享委员会根据其数据共享政策进行考虑。[1]: / external-ref ? link_type = ISRCTN&access_num = ISRCTN39653756。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hungary: Why healthcare reform was a cornerstone of victory over Orbán. Expansion of medical school places: funding a university seat is easy but finding high quality clinical placements is hard. Antidepressants: Sertraline batch is recalled over manufacturing error. Attrition in NHS dentistry threatens patient care. Doctor who charged two patients thousands for fake cancer treatments is struck off.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1