A natural history of the satyr: a dialectical history of myth and scientific observation since 1550.

IF 0.9 3区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Annals of Science Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1080/00033790.2024.2433643
Dániel Margócsy
{"title":"A natural history of the satyr: a dialectical history of myth and scientific observation since 1550.","authors":"Dániel Margócsy","doi":"10.1080/00033790.2024.2433643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article uses the mythological figure of the satyr to examine European attitudes towards incorporating mythical creatures into zoology and, more broadly, to survey attempts to reconcile the relative status of myth <i>vis-à-vis</i> modern science. Evidence is used from the past five hundred years to argue for the longevity of these debates, which continue to repeat the same arguments based on the same sources. It is argued that scholars' attitudes towards Ancient civilizations play a significant role in explaining whether they decide to consider the satyr as the product of the imperfect observation of monkeys or as a creature on its own right.</p>","PeriodicalId":8086,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Science","volume":" ","pages":"1-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00033790.2024.2433643","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article uses the mythological figure of the satyr to examine European attitudes towards incorporating mythical creatures into zoology and, more broadly, to survey attempts to reconcile the relative status of myth vis-à-vis modern science. Evidence is used from the past five hundred years to argue for the longevity of these debates, which continue to repeat the same arguments based on the same sources. It is argued that scholars' attitudes towards Ancient civilizations play a significant role in explaining whether they decide to consider the satyr as the product of the imperfect observation of monkeys or as a creature on its own right.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《羊人的自然史:1550年以来神话与科学观察的辩证史》。
本文以森林之神这一神话人物为例,考察欧洲人对将神话生物纳入动物学的态度,更广泛地说,考察人们试图调和神话与-à-vis现代科学的相对地位。过去五百年的证据被用来证明这些争论的长期性,这些争论基于同样的来源不断重复同样的论点。有人认为,学者对古代文明的态度在解释他们是否决定将森林之神视为对猴子不完美观察的产物还是作为一种自成一体的生物方面起着重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Science
Annals of Science 综合性期刊-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Science , launched in 1936, publishes work on the history of science, technology and medicine, covering developments from classical antiquity to the late 20th century. The Journal has a global reach, both in terms of the work that it publishes, and also in terms of its readership. The editors particularly welcome submissions from authors in Asia, Africa and South America. Each issue contains research articles, and a comprehensive book reviews section, including essay reviews on a group of books on a broader level. Articles are published in both English and French, and the Journal welcomes proposals for special issues on relevant topics. The Editors and Publisher are committed to supporting early career researchers, and award an annual prize to the best submission from current doctoral students, or those awarded a doctorate in the past four years.
期刊最新文献
Antimatter in astronomy and cosmology: the early history. Sound between water and light: images and analogies in early acoustics, 1660-1710. Antoine-Laurent Lavoisier's 'Sur la nature de l'eau': an annotated English translation. Sailing the ocean of nature: Francesca Fontana Aldrovandi in early modern Bologna. The late origins of the timeline, or: three paradoxes explained.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1