Does Targeting CPP at CPPopt Actually Improve Cerebrovascular Reactivity? A Secondary Analysis of the COGiTATE Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurocritical Care Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1007/s12028-024-02168-y
Erta Beqiri, Jeanette Tas, Marek Czosnyka, Ruud C R van Kaam, Joseph Donnelly, Roel H Haeren, Iwan C C van der Horst, Peter J Hutchinson, Sander M J van Kuijk, Annalisa L Liberti, David K Menon, Cornelia W E Hoedemaekers, Bart Depreitere, Geert Meyfroidt, Ari Ercole, Marcel J H Aries, Peter Smielewski
{"title":"Does Targeting CPP at CPPopt Actually Improve Cerebrovascular Reactivity? A Secondary Analysis of the COGiTATE Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Erta Beqiri, Jeanette Tas, Marek Czosnyka, Ruud C R van Kaam, Joseph Donnelly, Roel H Haeren, Iwan C C van der Horst, Peter J Hutchinson, Sander M J van Kuijk, Annalisa L Liberti, David K Menon, Cornelia W E Hoedemaekers, Bart Depreitere, Geert Meyfroidt, Ari Ercole, Marcel J H Aries, Peter Smielewski","doi":"10.1007/s12028-024-02168-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The 'CPPopt-Guided Therapy: Assessment of Target Effectiveness' (COGiTATE) randomised controlled trial demonstrated the feasibility and safety of targeting an automated cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) tailored to optimize cerebrovascular autoregulation (CPPopt) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) requiring intracranial pressure management. The average values of the autoregulation index known as the pressure reactivity index (PRx) were not different between the intervention (CPP target = CPPopt) and control (CPP target = 60-70 mmHg) groups of the trial. This secondary analysis was performed to investigate whether: (1) in the intervention group, PRx was closer to PRxopt (PRx at CPPopt) values, indicating a more preserved reactivity, as opposed to in the control group; (2) in the intervention group, patients experienced lower hourly PRx when CPP was close to the CPPopt-based target.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from the 28 and 32 patients randomized to the control and intervention groups of the COGiTATE study, respectively. We compared hourly averaged ΔPRx (PRx minus PRxopt, where PRxopt is PRx at CPPopt) between the two groups, focusing on periods of globally preserved/homogeneous autoregulation (negative PRxopt). For each patient in the intervention group, PRx values in periods when ΔCPP (CPP minus CPPopt target) was between -5 and + 5 mm Hg were compared to values in periods when ΔCPP was outside this range.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median ΔPRx was significantly lower in the intervention group for negative PRxopt (Mann-Whitney U-test, p < 0.001). For each patient in this group, the median PRx was lower in periods when CPP was close to the CPPopt-based target (Wilcoxon test, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite no statistically significant difference in the grand mean PRx, our results suggest that targeting CPPopt does provide a way of improving cerebrovascular reactivity in patients with TBI, offering a rational intervention for trials that address this issue. We also bring insight into aspects of the PRx/CPP relationship that should be considered for autoregulation-guided management for future clinical protocols and trials design.</p>","PeriodicalId":19118,"journal":{"name":"Neurocritical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-024-02168-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The 'CPPopt-Guided Therapy: Assessment of Target Effectiveness' (COGiTATE) randomised controlled trial demonstrated the feasibility and safety of targeting an automated cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) tailored to optimize cerebrovascular autoregulation (CPPopt) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) requiring intracranial pressure management. The average values of the autoregulation index known as the pressure reactivity index (PRx) were not different between the intervention (CPP target = CPPopt) and control (CPP target = 60-70 mmHg) groups of the trial. This secondary analysis was performed to investigate whether: (1) in the intervention group, PRx was closer to PRxopt (PRx at CPPopt) values, indicating a more preserved reactivity, as opposed to in the control group; (2) in the intervention group, patients experienced lower hourly PRx when CPP was close to the CPPopt-based target.

Methods: We analyzed data from the 28 and 32 patients randomized to the control and intervention groups of the COGiTATE study, respectively. We compared hourly averaged ΔPRx (PRx minus PRxopt, where PRxopt is PRx at CPPopt) between the two groups, focusing on periods of globally preserved/homogeneous autoregulation (negative PRxopt). For each patient in the intervention group, PRx values in periods when ΔCPP (CPP minus CPPopt target) was between -5 and + 5 mm Hg were compared to values in periods when ΔCPP was outside this range.

Results: The median ΔPRx was significantly lower in the intervention group for negative PRxopt (Mann-Whitney U-test, p < 0.001). For each patient in this group, the median PRx was lower in periods when CPP was close to the CPPopt-based target (Wilcoxon test, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Despite no statistically significant difference in the grand mean PRx, our results suggest that targeting CPPopt does provide a way of improving cerebrovascular reactivity in patients with TBI, offering a rational intervention for trials that address this issue. We also bring insight into aspects of the PRx/CPP relationship that should be considered for autoregulation-guided management for future clinical protocols and trials design.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以CPPopt为靶点的CPP能改善脑血管反应性吗?COGiTATE随机对照试验的二次分析。
背景:“CPPopt引导治疗:目标有效性评估”(COGiTATE)随机对照试验证明了在需要颅内压管理的创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者中,靶向自动脑灌注压(CPP)以优化脑血管自动调节(CPPopt)的可行性和安全性。在干预组(CPP目标= CPPopt)和对照组(CPP目标= 60-70 mmHg)之间,被称为压力反应性指数(PRx)的自动调节指数的平均值没有差异。本二次分析旨在探讨:(1)干预组PRx更接近PRxopt (CPPopt时的PRx)值,表明与对照组相比,PRx的反应性更保留;(2)在干预组中,当CPP接近基于CPP的目标时,患者每小时PRx较低。方法:我们对随机分为COGiTATE研究的对照组和干预组的28例和32例患者进行数据分析。我们比较了两组之间的小时平均值ΔPRx (PRx减去PRxopt,其中PRxopt是CPPopt时的PRx),重点关注全局保存/均匀自动调节(负PRxopt)的时期。对于干预组中的每个患者,将ΔCPP (CPP减去CPPopt目标)在-5和+ 5 mm Hg之间的PRx值与ΔCPP不在此范围内的PRx值进行比较。结果:PRxopt阴性干预组的中位数ΔPRx显著降低(Mann-Whitney u检验,p)。结论:尽管PRx的大平均值没有统计学上的显著差异,但我们的结果表明,针对CPPopt确实提供了一种改善TBI患者脑血管反应性的方法,为解决这一问题的试验提供了合理的干预措施。我们还深入了解了PRx/CPP关系的各个方面,这些方面应该被考虑用于未来临床方案和试验设计的自动调节指导管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurocritical Care
Neurocritical Care 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.60%
发文量
221
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurocritical Care is a peer reviewed scientific publication whose major goal is to disseminate new knowledge on all aspects of acute neurological care. It is directed towards neurosurgeons, neuro-intensivists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care nurses treating patients with urgent neurologic disorders. These are conditions that may potentially evolve rapidly and could need immediate medical or surgical intervention. Neurocritical Care provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in intensive care neurology, neurosurgery and neuroanesthesia and includes information about new therapeutic avenues and technological innovations. Neurocritical Care is the official journal of the Neurocritical Care Society.
期刊最新文献
Palliative Care Spiritual Assessment and Goals-of-Care Discussions in the Neurocritical Care Unit: Collaborating with Chaplains. States Do Not Delineate the "Accepted Medical Standards" for Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria Determination. Does Celecoxib Actually Reduce Mortality in Patients with Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage? Hemoglobin Decrements are Associated with Ischemic Brain Lesions and Poor Outcomes in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Safety Analysis of Visual Percutaneous Tracheostomy in Neurocritical Care Patients with Anticoagulation and Antithrombosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1