Comparison of Culturing Methods of Primary Vaginal Fibroblasts.

IF 0.8 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.) Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1097/SPV.0000000000001612
Olivia O Cardenas-Trowers, Tammee M Parsons, Jing Zhao, Ralph B Perkerson, Christopher C Glembotski, Frederic Zenhausern, Geoffrey C Gurtner, Marianna Alperin, Takahisa Kanekiyo
{"title":"Comparison of Culturing Methods of Primary Vaginal Fibroblasts.","authors":"Olivia O Cardenas-Trowers, Tammee M Parsons, Jing Zhao, Ralph B Perkerson, Christopher C Glembotski, Frederic Zenhausern, Geoffrey C Gurtner, Marianna Alperin, Takahisa Kanekiyo","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Vaginal fibroblast function is altered in people with pelvic organ prolapse. Thus, it is important to study vaginal fibroblasts to better understand the pathophysiology of prolapse.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare 3 culturing methods of primary vaginal fibroblasts.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was an in vitro study. Patients who were undergoing surgery for vaginal prolapse were recruited. Excess vaginal epithelial tissue that would have otherwise been discarded was collected. The vaginal fibroblasts from each participant were cultured via (1) 3-hour digest, (2) coverslip, and (3) gelatin-coat methods. Differences in the efficiency of cell isolation, expression of known fibroblast-associated genes, and cellular function were compared between the 3 methods using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey test for post hoc pairwise comparisons (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five patients with pelvic organ prolapse were recruited. Fibroblasts cultured via the 3-hour digest method became confluent within 3-5 days in a 100-mm dish compared to 2-3 weeks in a 6-well dish for the coverslip and gelatin-coat methods. Cells from all culture methods expressed similar amounts of vimentin and α smooth muscle actin. There were no significant differences in morphology; gene expression levels of MMP1, MMP2, ACTA2, COL1A1, COL3A1, and LOXL1 on qPCR; cell viability; proliferation; and migration between the 3 culturing methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Culturing primary vaginal fibroblasts via the 3-hour digest, coverslip, and gelatin-coat methods similarly resulted in reliable primary vaginal fibroblast growth and function.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Vaginal fibroblast function is altered in people with pelvic organ prolapse. Thus, it is important to study vaginal fibroblasts to better understand the pathophysiology of prolapse.

Objective: This study aimed to compare 3 culturing methods of primary vaginal fibroblasts.

Study design: This was an in vitro study. Patients who were undergoing surgery for vaginal prolapse were recruited. Excess vaginal epithelial tissue that would have otherwise been discarded was collected. The vaginal fibroblasts from each participant were cultured via (1) 3-hour digest, (2) coverslip, and (3) gelatin-coat methods. Differences in the efficiency of cell isolation, expression of known fibroblast-associated genes, and cellular function were compared between the 3 methods using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey test for post hoc pairwise comparisons (P < 0.05).

Results: Five patients with pelvic organ prolapse were recruited. Fibroblasts cultured via the 3-hour digest method became confluent within 3-5 days in a 100-mm dish compared to 2-3 weeks in a 6-well dish for the coverslip and gelatin-coat methods. Cells from all culture methods expressed similar amounts of vimentin and α smooth muscle actin. There were no significant differences in morphology; gene expression levels of MMP1, MMP2, ACTA2, COL1A1, COL3A1, and LOXL1 on qPCR; cell viability; proliferation; and migration between the 3 culturing methods.

Conclusion: Culturing primary vaginal fibroblasts via the 3-hour digest, coverslip, and gelatin-coat methods similarly resulted in reliable primary vaginal fibroblast growth and function.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阴道原代成纤维细胞培养方法的比较。
重要性:盆腔器官脱垂患者阴道成纤维细胞功能发生改变。因此,研究阴道成纤维细胞对更好地了解脱垂的病理生理具有重要意义。目的:比较3种培养阴道原代成纤维细胞的方法。研究设计:这是一项体外研究。研究招募了正在接受阴道脱垂手术的患者。多余的阴道上皮组织被收集起来,否则就会被丢弃。每个参与者的阴道成纤维细胞通过(1)3小时消化法,(2)覆盖法和(3)明胶包被法进行培养。采用单因素方差分析和事后两两比较的Tukey检验比较3种方法在细胞分离效率、已知成纤维细胞相关基因表达和细胞功能方面的差异(P < 0.05)。结果:5例盆腔器官脱垂患者入选。通过3小时消化法培养的成纤维细胞在3-5天内在100毫米培养皿中融合,而盖盖法和明胶涂层法在6孔培养皿中则需要2-3周。所有培养方法的细胞表达量相近的波形蛋白和α平滑肌肌动蛋白。形态学差异无统计学意义;qPCR检测MMP1、MMP2、ACTA2、COL1A1、COL3A1、LOXL1基因表达水平;细胞生存能力;扩散;并在3种培养方法之间迁移。结论:通过3小时消化法、复盖法和明胶包被法培养原代阴道成纤维细胞,同样可以获得可靠的原代阴道成纤维细胞生长和功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adverse Events Associated With Female External Urinary Collection Devices. Tamsulosin to Prevent Urinary Retention After Vaginal Urogynecologic Surgery. The Effect of Concomitant Hysterectomy Route on Robotic Sacrocolpopexy Outcomes. Urogynecology Research Is Underrepresented in Top Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals. Treatment Crossover Following Advanced Therapy for Overactive Bladder Syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1