Lima M Emal, Sietske J Tamminga, Annechien Beumer, Sanja Kezic, Danielle R Timmermans, Frederieke G Schaafsma, Henk F van der Molen
{"title":"Risk Perceptions of Health Care Workers and Occupational Health Experts on Psychological Distress: A Qualitative Mental Model Study.","authors":"Lima M Emal, Sietske J Tamminga, Annechien Beumer, Sanja Kezic, Danielle R Timmermans, Frederieke G Schaafsma, Henk F van der Molen","doi":"10.1097/JOM.0000000000003228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objectives of this study are to explore healthcare workers' (HCWs') mental models regarding psychological distress and to compare these with that of experts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semistructured interviews were conducted (n = 28 HCWs, n = 13 experts). The topic list encompassed risk perception, early stress symptoms, causes, consequences, and preventive measures of psychological distress. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed using MAXQDA (VERBI Software, Berlin).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Similarities were found in risk perception, symptoms, causes, and consequences. Differences arose in HCWs' reliance on personal experiences and values versus experts' scientific perspective. Preventive measures also showed discrepancies. Variation within HCWs was found on all aspects of their mental model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For effective preventive interventions regarding psychological distress, experts should consider HCWs' personal values and experiences, acknowledging the variation in their mental models. This approach may enhance HCWs' engagement in preventive behaviors.</p>","PeriodicalId":94100,"journal":{"name":"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine","volume":"66 12","pages":"1066-1071"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000003228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The objectives of this study are to explore healthcare workers' (HCWs') mental models regarding psychological distress and to compare these with that of experts.
Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted (n = 28 HCWs, n = 13 experts). The topic list encompassed risk perception, early stress symptoms, causes, consequences, and preventive measures of psychological distress. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed using MAXQDA (VERBI Software, Berlin).
Results: Similarities were found in risk perception, symptoms, causes, and consequences. Differences arose in HCWs' reliance on personal experiences and values versus experts' scientific perspective. Preventive measures also showed discrepancies. Variation within HCWs was found on all aspects of their mental model.
Conclusion: For effective preventive interventions regarding psychological distress, experts should consider HCWs' personal values and experiences, acknowledging the variation in their mental models. This approach may enhance HCWs' engagement in preventive behaviors.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
