{"title":"Inter-rater Agreement in Multi-informant Reports of Psychosocial Functioning of Pediatric Brain and Solid Tumor Survivors.","authors":"Manali Zope, Matthew C Hocking","doi":"10.1007/s10880-024-10059-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>For pediatric cancer survivors in the post-treatment, school-reintegration period, integrating multi-informant reports and promoting a mutual clinician-family-school understanding of the child's needs are critical for comprehensive care. This study evaluated patterns of agreement between child, parent, and teacher reports of psychosocial functioning in pediatric brain tumor survivors (PBTS) and non-CNS solid tumor survivors (PSTS).</p><p><strong>Participants and methods: </strong>PBTS (n = 51) and PSTS (n = 34) age 7-14 who received tumor-directed therapy completed the study. Parents and teachers completed the CBCL/TRF and SSIS, and parents and children completed the PedsQL and PROMIS peer relationships. Intra-class correlation coefficients, % disagreements, t-tests, and correlations quantified inter-rater agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis yielded poor-to-moderate ICC levels across measures. Parent-teacher agreement was higher for reports of externalizing symptoms. Parents had higher ratings of child-internalizing problems, but lower ratings of overall social skills than teacher ratings. Parents had higher ratings of child emotional functioning and social skills compared to self-reports.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings underscore the necessity for integrating multi-informant reports of psychosocial functioning in assessment for pediatric cancer survivors. Findings also highlight critical gaps in mutual parent-teacher-child understanding, indicating the need for increased collaboration in the post-treatment period.</p>","PeriodicalId":15494,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-024-10059-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: For pediatric cancer survivors in the post-treatment, school-reintegration period, integrating multi-informant reports and promoting a mutual clinician-family-school understanding of the child's needs are critical for comprehensive care. This study evaluated patterns of agreement between child, parent, and teacher reports of psychosocial functioning in pediatric brain tumor survivors (PBTS) and non-CNS solid tumor survivors (PSTS).
Participants and methods: PBTS (n = 51) and PSTS (n = 34) age 7-14 who received tumor-directed therapy completed the study. Parents and teachers completed the CBCL/TRF and SSIS, and parents and children completed the PedsQL and PROMIS peer relationships. Intra-class correlation coefficients, % disagreements, t-tests, and correlations quantified inter-rater agreement.
Results: Analysis yielded poor-to-moderate ICC levels across measures. Parent-teacher agreement was higher for reports of externalizing symptoms. Parents had higher ratings of child-internalizing problems, but lower ratings of overall social skills than teacher ratings. Parents had higher ratings of child emotional functioning and social skills compared to self-reports.
Conclusions: Findings underscore the necessity for integrating multi-informant reports of psychosocial functioning in assessment for pediatric cancer survivors. Findings also highlight critical gaps in mutual parent-teacher-child understanding, indicating the need for increased collaboration in the post-treatment period.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings is an international forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers related to all areas of the science and practice of psychologists in medical settings. Manuscripts are chosen that have a broad appeal across psychology as well as other health care disciplines, reflecting varying backgrounds, interests, and specializations. The journal publishes original research, treatment outcome trials, meta-analyses, literature reviews, conceptual papers, brief scientific reports, and scholarly case studies. Papers accepted address clinical matters in medical settings; integrated care; health disparities; education and training of the future psychology workforce; interdisciplinary collaboration, training, and professionalism; licensing, credentialing, and privileging in hospital practice; research and practice ethics; professional development of psychologists in academic health centers; professional practice matters in medical settings; and cultural, economic, political, regulatory, and systems factors in health care. In summary, the journal provides a forum for papers predicted to have significant theoretical or practical importance for the application of psychology in medical settings.