Efficacy of Blood Flow Restriction Exercise for Improving Lower Limb Muscle Strength and Function in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1111/sms.14759
Anette Bach Jønsson, Søren Krogh, Susanne Lillelund, Per Aagaard, Helge Kasch, Jørgen Feldbæk Nielsen
{"title":"Efficacy of Blood Flow Restriction Exercise for Improving Lower Limb Muscle Strength and Function in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Anette Bach Jønsson, Søren Krogh, Susanne Lillelund, Per Aagaard, Helge Kasch, Jørgen Feldbæk Nielsen","doi":"10.1111/sms.14759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of low‐load (LL) blood flow restriction exercise (BFRE) for improving lower limb muscle strength, muscle thickness and physical function in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). In a randomized sham‐controlled trial, 21 participants (age ≥ 18 years, SCI duration ≥ 1 year, knee extensor strength grade 2–4, ASIA A‐D) were randomized to either 45‐min LL‐BFRE (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 11) or sham BFRE (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 10) twice/week for 8 weeks. The exercise protocol consisted of four sets (30 × 15 × 15 × 15 repetitions) of unilateral seated leg extensions and leg curls at 30%–40% of 1RM performed with pneumatic cuffs applied proximally on the trained limb and inflated to 40% of total arterial occlusion pressure (BFRE) or non‐inflated (sham exercise). Maximal voluntary isometric quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength, quadriceps muscle thickness, thigh circumference, and physical function were assessed at baseline, after 4 and 8 weeks of training and at 4‐week follow‐up. No significant between‐group differences were found between BFRE and sham exercise in quadriceps or hamstring muscle strength, 10‐m walking test, timed up &amp; go, 6‐min walking test or the spinal cord independence measure. In contrast, a significant between‐group difference favoring BFRE was present for muscle thickness and thigh circumference from baseline to 4‐week follow‐up (0.76 cm (95% CI: 0.32; 1.20, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.002) and 2.42 cm (0.05; 4.79, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.05), respectively). In conclusion, there was no significant difference in the effect of LL‐BFRE and sham exercise on muscle strength and physical function in individuals with SCI. However, significant increases in muscle thickness and thigh circumference were observed in favor of BFRE.Trial Registration: <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\" xlink:href=\"http://clinicaltrials.gov\">ClinicalTrials.gov</jats:ext-link> identifier: NCT03690700.","PeriodicalId":21466,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.14759","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of low‐load (LL) blood flow restriction exercise (BFRE) for improving lower limb muscle strength, muscle thickness and physical function in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). In a randomized sham‐controlled trial, 21 participants (age ≥ 18 years, SCI duration ≥ 1 year, knee extensor strength grade 2–4, ASIA A‐D) were randomized to either 45‐min LL‐BFRE (n = 11) or sham BFRE (n = 10) twice/week for 8 weeks. The exercise protocol consisted of four sets (30 × 15 × 15 × 15 repetitions) of unilateral seated leg extensions and leg curls at 30%–40% of 1RM performed with pneumatic cuffs applied proximally on the trained limb and inflated to 40% of total arterial occlusion pressure (BFRE) or non‐inflated (sham exercise). Maximal voluntary isometric quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength, quadriceps muscle thickness, thigh circumference, and physical function were assessed at baseline, after 4 and 8 weeks of training and at 4‐week follow‐up. No significant between‐group differences were found between BFRE and sham exercise in quadriceps or hamstring muscle strength, 10‐m walking test, timed up & go, 6‐min walking test or the spinal cord independence measure. In contrast, a significant between‐group difference favoring BFRE was present for muscle thickness and thigh circumference from baseline to 4‐week follow‐up (0.76 cm (95% CI: 0.32; 1.20, p = 0.002) and 2.42 cm (0.05; 4.79, p = 0.05), respectively). In conclusion, there was no significant difference in the effect of LL‐BFRE and sham exercise on muscle strength and physical function in individuals with SCI. However, significant increases in muscle thickness and thigh circumference were observed in favor of BFRE.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03690700.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
限制血流运动改善慢性脊髓损伤患者下肢肌肉力量和功能的疗效:一项随机对照试验
本研究的目的是评估低负荷(LL)血流量限制运动(BFRE)对改善脊髓损伤(SCI)患者下肢肌肉力量、肌肉厚度和身体功能的功效。在一项随机的假对照试验中,21名参与者(年龄≥18岁,SCI持续时间≥1年,膝关节伸肌力量等级2-4,ASIA a - D)被随机分配到45分钟的LL - BFRE (n = 11)或假BFRE (n = 10),每周两次,持续8周。运动方案包括四组(30 × 15 × 15 × 15重复)单侧坐式腿伸展和腿卷曲,强度为1RM的30%-40%,在训练肢体上近端应用气动袖带,膨胀至总动脉闭塞压(BFRE)的40%或不膨胀(假运动)。在基线、训练4周和8周后以及4周随访时评估最大自主等长四头肌和腘绳肌力量、四头肌厚度、大腿围和身体功能。在股四头肌或腘绳肌力量、10米步行测试、计时和锻炼方面,BFRE和假锻炼在组间无显著差异;6分钟步行测试或脊髓独立性测试。相比之下,从基线到随访4周,BFRE组间的肌肉厚度和大腿围存在显著差异(0.76 cm) (95% CI: 0.32;1.20, p = 0.002)和2.42 cm (0.05;4.79, p = 0.05)。综上所述,LL - BFRE和假运动对脊髓损伤个体肌肉力量和身体功能的影响无显著差异。然而,肌肉厚度和大腿围明显增加,有利于BFRE。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03690700。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.90%
发文量
162
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports is a multidisciplinary journal published 12 times per year under the auspices of the Scandinavian Foundation of Medicine and Science in Sports. It aims to publish high quality and impactful articles in the fields of orthopaedics, rehabilitation and sports medicine, exercise physiology and biochemistry, biomechanics and motor control, health and disease relating to sport, exercise and physical activity, as well as on the social and behavioural aspects of sport and exercise.
期刊最新文献
Selective Static Stretching of Rectus Femoris Alters Motor Unit Firing Behaviors of Knee Extensors. Physiological Resilience: What Is It and How Might It Be Trained? Physical Fitness and Activity Levels as Predictors of Subjective Well-Being in Youths With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A 2-Year Longitudinal Analysis of the Diactive-1 Cohort Study. Associations of 24‐h Movement Behaviors With Incidence of Cardiovascular Risk Factors: The Finnish Retirement and Aging Study Dilemma in the Treatment of Sports Injuries in Athletes: Tendon Overuse, Muscle Strain, and Tendon Rupture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1