The persistent problem of persistent air-leaks: approach to management.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1097/MCP.0000000000001134
George Mundanchira, Laura Frye, Janani Reisenauer, Abhinav Agrawal
{"title":"The persistent problem of persistent air-leaks: approach to management.","authors":"George Mundanchira, Laura Frye, Janani Reisenauer, Abhinav Agrawal","doi":"10.1097/MCP.0000000000001134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Persistent air leaks, defined as an air leak extending beyond 5 days, pose a significant challenge for cardiothoracic surgeons and pulmonologists. Although current guidelines advocate for surgical intervention as the primary treatment, many patients may not suitable candidates for immediate return to the operating room. Alternatively, conservative management, which involves watchful waiting for pleural healing, often results in prolonged hospital stays and increased morbidity.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Although current guidelines advocate for surgical intervention as the primary treatment, many patients may not suitable candidates for immediate return to the operating room. Alternatively, conservative management, which involves watchful waiting for pleural healing, often results in prolonged hospital stays and increased morbidity. For patients who are not surgical candidates, use of autologous blood patch, pleurodesis or endobronchial valves may offer a viable alternative to conservatively manage air leak.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This review evaluates the various noninvasive therapies that have been explored, including sealants, Heimlich valves, chemical and autologous blood patch pleurodesis, and endo and intrabronchial valves. Although these alternatives show promise, further research is needed to compare these treatments before they can be recommended in new guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":11090,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"31 1","pages":"28-34"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCP.0000000000001134","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Persistent air leaks, defined as an air leak extending beyond 5 days, pose a significant challenge for cardiothoracic surgeons and pulmonologists. Although current guidelines advocate for surgical intervention as the primary treatment, many patients may not suitable candidates for immediate return to the operating room. Alternatively, conservative management, which involves watchful waiting for pleural healing, often results in prolonged hospital stays and increased morbidity.

Recent findings: Although current guidelines advocate for surgical intervention as the primary treatment, many patients may not suitable candidates for immediate return to the operating room. Alternatively, conservative management, which involves watchful waiting for pleural healing, often results in prolonged hospital stays and increased morbidity. For patients who are not surgical candidates, use of autologous blood patch, pleurodesis or endobronchial valves may offer a viable alternative to conservatively manage air leak.

Summary: This review evaluates the various noninvasive therapies that have been explored, including sealants, Heimlich valves, chemical and autologous blood patch pleurodesis, and endo and intrabronchial valves. Although these alternatives show promise, further research is needed to compare these treatments before they can be recommended in new guidelines.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
持续空气泄漏的持续问题:管理方法。
回顾目的:持续的空气泄漏,定义为持续超过5天的空气泄漏,对心胸外科医生和肺科医生构成了重大挑战。虽然目前的指南提倡手术干预作为主要治疗,但许多患者可能不适合立即返回手术室。另外,保守治疗,包括观察等待胸膜愈合,往往导致住院时间延长和发病率增加。最新发现:虽然目前的指南提倡手术干预作为主要治疗,但许多患者可能不适合立即返回手术室。另外,保守治疗,包括观察等待胸膜愈合,往往导致住院时间延长和发病率增加。对于不适合手术的患者,使用自体血贴片、胸膜切除术或支气管内瓣膜可能是保守治疗漏气的可行选择。摘要:本文综述了各种已探索的无创治疗方法,包括密封剂,海姆利克氏瓣膜,化学和自体血膜片胸膜切除术,以及支气管内和支气管内瓣膜。虽然这些替代方案显示出希望,但在新指南中推荐之前,还需要进一步的研究来比较这些治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine is a highly regarded journal offering insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews, covering key subjects such as asthma; cystic fibrosis; infectious diseases; diseases of the pleura; and sleep and respiratory neurobiology. Published bimonthly, each issue of Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine introduces world renowned guest editors and internationally recognized academics within the pulmonary field, delivering a widespread selection of expert assessments on the latest developments from the most recent literature.
期刊最新文献
Household air pollution and respiratory health in Africa: persistent risk and unchanged health burdens. Pulmonary embolism work-up in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations: what is the best strategy for clinicians? The bronchiectasis microbiome: current understanding and treatment implications. Impact of occupational exposures in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: current understanding and knowledge gaps. Abnormal spirometry in individuals with a smoking history and no known obstructive lung disease: current understanding and clinical implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1