Active listening modulates the spatial hearing experience: a multicentric study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Experimental Brain Research Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1007/s00221-024-06955-z
Chiara Valzolgher, Tommaso Rosi, Sara Ghiselli, Domenico Cuda, Jessica Gullotta, Diego Zanetti, Giorgio Lilli, Federica Di Berardino, Marco Pozzi, Andrea Ciorba, Nicola Brunelli, Lucia Belen Musumano, Francesco Pavani
{"title":"Active listening modulates the spatial hearing experience: a multicentric study.","authors":"Chiara Valzolgher, Tommaso Rosi, Sara Ghiselli, Domenico Cuda, Jessica Gullotta, Diego Zanetti, Giorgio Lilli, Federica Di Berardino, Marco Pozzi, Andrea Ciorba, Nicola Brunelli, Lucia Belen Musumano, Francesco Pavani","doi":"10.1007/s00221-024-06955-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although flexible and portable virtual reality technologies have simplified measuring participants' perception of acoustic space, their clinical adoption remains limited, often lacking ecological fidelity. In clinical practice, participants are typically instructed to remain still when testing sound localization, whereas head movements are crucial in daily life. Additionally, assessing spatial hearing extends beyond measuring accuracy to include meta-cognitive evaluations like perceived effort and confidence, which are rarely adopted. Our study hypothesized that allowing head movement during sound localization, compared to a static head condition, would reduce perceived listening effort and enhance confidence in normal hearing participants. Conducted across three audiology and otology hospital services in Northern Italy, the study involved personnel inexperienced with our VR equipment. This also tested the feasibility and usability of our VR approach in clinical settings. Results showed that head movements reduced subjective effort but did not significantly affect perceived confidence. However, during the active condition, participants reporting higher confidence exhibited less head movement and explored the space less. Similarly, those with less head movement reported lower listening effort. These findings underscore the importance of allowing natural posture to capture the full extent of spatial hearing capabilities and the value of including metacognitive evaluations in assessing performance. Our use of affordable, off-the-shelf VR equipment effectively measured spatial hearing in clinical settings, providing a flexible alternative to current static systems. This approach highlights the potential for more dynamic and comprehensive assessments in clinical audiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":12268,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Brain Research","volume":"243 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-024-06955-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although flexible and portable virtual reality technologies have simplified measuring participants' perception of acoustic space, their clinical adoption remains limited, often lacking ecological fidelity. In clinical practice, participants are typically instructed to remain still when testing sound localization, whereas head movements are crucial in daily life. Additionally, assessing spatial hearing extends beyond measuring accuracy to include meta-cognitive evaluations like perceived effort and confidence, which are rarely adopted. Our study hypothesized that allowing head movement during sound localization, compared to a static head condition, would reduce perceived listening effort and enhance confidence in normal hearing participants. Conducted across three audiology and otology hospital services in Northern Italy, the study involved personnel inexperienced with our VR equipment. This also tested the feasibility and usability of our VR approach in clinical settings. Results showed that head movements reduced subjective effort but did not significantly affect perceived confidence. However, during the active condition, participants reporting higher confidence exhibited less head movement and explored the space less. Similarly, those with less head movement reported lower listening effort. These findings underscore the importance of allowing natural posture to capture the full extent of spatial hearing capabilities and the value of including metacognitive evaluations in assessing performance. Our use of affordable, off-the-shelf VR equipment effectively measured spatial hearing in clinical settings, providing a flexible alternative to current static systems. This approach highlights the potential for more dynamic and comprehensive assessments in clinical audiology.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主动倾听调节空间听觉体验:一项多中心研究。
尽管灵活和便携的虚拟现实技术简化了测量参与者对声空间的感知,但其临床应用仍然有限,往往缺乏生态保真度。在临床实践中,参与者通常被要求在测试声音定位时保持静止,而头部运动在日常生活中至关重要。此外,评估空间听力不仅限于测量准确性,还包括元认知评估,如感知努力和信心,这些评估很少被采用。我们的研究假设,在声音定位过程中允许头部运动,与头部静止的情况相比,可以减少正常听力参与者的听觉努力,增强他们的信心。这项研究在意大利北部的三家听力学和耳科医院进行,研究人员对我们的VR设备缺乏经验。这也测试了我们的VR方法在临床环境中的可行性和可用性。结果表明,头部运动减少了主观努力,但对感知信心没有显著影响。然而,在积极状态下,报告较高自信的参与者表现出较少的头部运动和较少的探索空间。同样,那些头部运动较少的人也表示他们的听力努力程度较低。这些发现强调了让自然姿势充分捕捉空间听力能力的重要性,以及在评估表现时包括元认知评估的价值。我们使用价格合理、现成的VR设备,在临床环境中有效地测量空间听力,为当前的静态系统提供了灵活的替代方案。这种方法强调了在临床听力学中进行更动态和全面评估的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1966, Experimental Brain Research publishes original contributions on many aspects of experimental research of the central and peripheral nervous system. The focus is on molecular, physiology, behavior, neurochemistry, developmental, cellular and molecular neurobiology, and experimental pathology relevant to general problems of cerebral function. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and mini-reviews.
期刊最新文献
Patterns of brain activity in choice or instructed go and no-go tasks. Correlates of gait speed changes during uneven terrain walking in older adults: differential roles of cognitive and sensorimotor function. Effector selection precedes movement specification: evidence from repetition effects in motor planning. Can visual acceleration evoke a sensation of tilt? Covariation of corticospinal excitability and the autonomous nervous system by virtual reality: the roller coaster effect.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1