Correlates of gait speed changes during uneven terrain walking in older adults: differential roles of cognitive and sensorimotor function.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Experimental Brain Research Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1007/s00221-025-07019-6
Valay A Shah, Yenisel Cruz-Almeida, Arkaprava Roy, Erta Cenko, Ryan J Downey, Daniel P Ferris, Chris J Hass, Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz, David J Clark, Todd M Manini, Rachael D Seidler
{"title":"Correlates of gait speed changes during uneven terrain walking in older adults: differential roles of cognitive and sensorimotor function.","authors":"Valay A Shah, Yenisel Cruz-Almeida, Arkaprava Roy, Erta Cenko, Ryan J Downey, Daniel P Ferris, Chris J Hass, Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz, David J Clark, Todd M Manini, Rachael D Seidler","doi":"10.1007/s00221-025-07019-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many studies of walking function and aging have measured walking on flat surfaces with and without dual-tasking (i.e., performing a concurrent cognitive task). Walking in the community increases the complexity with surface undulations and varying surface types. We hypothesized that changes in walking resulting from increasing terrain unevenness would be better predicted by sensorimotor function than cognitive function. Sixty-three community-dwelling older adults (65-93 yrs old; 32 males) performed overground walking under four uneven terrain conditions (Flat, Low, Medium, and High unevenness). Cognitive (cognitive flexibility, working memory, inhibition) and sensorimotor assessments (grip strength, 2-pt discrimination, pressure pain threshold) were measured as the primary predictors of walking performance. We found that walking speed decreased linearly with more elevated uneven terrain conditions across all participants; this was accentuated in older adults with lower mobility function. Greater rates of decline in walking speed from flat to uneven terrain were associated with worse attention and inhibitory function as well as lower 2-point tactile discrimination. Findings suggest that greater rates of decline with elevated terrain walking are associated with lower mobility function, lower executive functions and less somatosensation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12268,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Brain Research","volume":"243 3","pages":"72"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-025-07019-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many studies of walking function and aging have measured walking on flat surfaces with and without dual-tasking (i.e., performing a concurrent cognitive task). Walking in the community increases the complexity with surface undulations and varying surface types. We hypothesized that changes in walking resulting from increasing terrain unevenness would be better predicted by sensorimotor function than cognitive function. Sixty-three community-dwelling older adults (65-93 yrs old; 32 males) performed overground walking under four uneven terrain conditions (Flat, Low, Medium, and High unevenness). Cognitive (cognitive flexibility, working memory, inhibition) and sensorimotor assessments (grip strength, 2-pt discrimination, pressure pain threshold) were measured as the primary predictors of walking performance. We found that walking speed decreased linearly with more elevated uneven terrain conditions across all participants; this was accentuated in older adults with lower mobility function. Greater rates of decline in walking speed from flat to uneven terrain were associated with worse attention and inhibitory function as well as lower 2-point tactile discrimination. Findings suggest that greater rates of decline with elevated terrain walking are associated with lower mobility function, lower executive functions and less somatosensation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年人在不平坦地形行走时步态速度变化的相关性:认知和感觉运动功能的不同作用。
许多关于行走功能和衰老的研究都测量了在有和没有双重任务(即执行并发认知任务)的情况下在平面上行走的情况。在社区中行走增加了地形起伏和地形类型的复杂性。我们假设,由地形不平坦度增加引起的行走变化,感觉运动功能比认知功能更能预测。63名居住在社区的老年人(65-93岁;32名男性)在四种不平坦的地形条件下(平坦、低、中、高不平坦)进行地面行走。认知(认知灵活性、工作记忆、抑制)和感觉运动评估(握力、2点辨别、压痛阈)作为步行表现的主要预测指标。我们发现,所有参与者的步行速度都随着海拔较高的不平坦地形而线性下降;这在活动功能较低的老年人中更为突出。从平地到不平地,行走速度下降的速度越大,注意力和抑制功能就越差,两点触觉辨别能力也越低。研究结果表明,在高地形行走时,大脑功能下降的速度越快,移动功能、执行功能和躯体感觉就越差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1966, Experimental Brain Research publishes original contributions on many aspects of experimental research of the central and peripheral nervous system. The focus is on molecular, physiology, behavior, neurochemistry, developmental, cellular and molecular neurobiology, and experimental pathology relevant to general problems of cerebral function. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and mini-reviews.
期刊最新文献
The influence of prism adaptation on spatial biases is not dependent on which hand is used to adapt. Impaired motor imagery in children with developmental coordination disorder: task-specific deficits and links to ADHD and ASD traits. Neuromuscular adaptation and postural muscle activity patterns during visual virtual reality stimulation: age-related differences between young and older adults. Binasal occlusion modulates cortical functional connectivity and hemodynamics in acquired paralytic esotropia: a fNIRS study. Comments on "The equilibrium point hypothesis revisited: why threshold control does not explain human movement" (Mangalam and Stergiou, Exp Brain Res., 2026).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1