The role of automation etiquette and task-criticality on performance, workload, automation reliance, and user confidence.

IF 3.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Applied Ergonomics Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104430
Zachary Guyton, Richard Pak, Ericka Rovira
{"title":"The role of automation etiquette and task-criticality on performance, workload, automation reliance, and user confidence.","authors":"Zachary Guyton, Richard Pak, Ericka Rovira","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research suggests good automation etiquette can yield positive effects on user performance, trust, automation reliance, and user confidence - especially in personified or anthropomorphized technologies. The current study examined the impact of automation etiquette and task-criticality in non-personified technology. The study used a computer-based automation task to examine good and bad automation etiquette models and different domain-based task-criticality levels (between-subjects) that contained various stages of automation (stage 2 and stage 3) and automation reliability levels (60% and 80%) (within-subjects). The study found that bad automation etiquette can increase automation bias and automation reliance which improved performance in the most capable automation condition (stage 3; 80% reliable) but also heightened user subjective workload and decreased user self-confidence. The study also demonstrated task-criticality can be successfully manipulated through domain and instructions. Overall, automation etiquette influenced performance and user confidence more in highly capable automation (stage 3) and in a low-criticality task domain.</p>","PeriodicalId":55502,"journal":{"name":"Applied Ergonomics","volume":"125 ","pages":"104430"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104430","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research suggests good automation etiquette can yield positive effects on user performance, trust, automation reliance, and user confidence - especially in personified or anthropomorphized technologies. The current study examined the impact of automation etiquette and task-criticality in non-personified technology. The study used a computer-based automation task to examine good and bad automation etiquette models and different domain-based task-criticality levels (between-subjects) that contained various stages of automation (stage 2 and stage 3) and automation reliability levels (60% and 80%) (within-subjects). The study found that bad automation etiquette can increase automation bias and automation reliance which improved performance in the most capable automation condition (stage 3; 80% reliable) but also heightened user subjective workload and decreased user self-confidence. The study also demonstrated task-criticality can be successfully manipulated through domain and instructions. Overall, automation etiquette influenced performance and user confidence more in highly capable automation (stage 3) and in a low-criticality task domain.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自动化礼仪和任务关键性在性能、工作量、自动化依赖和用户信心方面的作用。
先前的研究表明,良好的自动化礼仪可以对用户的表现、信任、自动化依赖和用户信心产生积极影响——尤其是在拟人化或拟人化的技术中。目前的研究考察了自动化礼仪和任务关键性对非拟人化技术的影响。该研究使用基于计算机的自动化任务来检查好的和坏的自动化礼仪模型和不同的基于领域的任务临界水平(科目之间),其中包含不同的自动化阶段(阶段2和阶段3)和自动化可靠性水平(60%和80%)(科目内部)。研究发现,不良的自动化礼仪会增加自动化偏见和自动化依赖,从而提高了在最有能力的自动化条件下的绩效(阶段3;80%可靠),但也增加了用户的主观工作量,降低了用户的自信心。研究还表明,任务临界性可以通过域和指令成功地操纵。总体而言,自动化礼仪在高能力自动化(阶段3)和低临界任务领域对性能和用户信心的影响更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Ergonomics
Applied Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
248
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Applied Ergonomics is aimed at ergonomists and all those interested in applying ergonomics/human factors in the design, planning and management of technical and social systems at work or leisure. Readership is truly international with subscribers in over 50 countries. Professionals for whom Applied Ergonomics is of interest include: ergonomists, designers, industrial engineers, health and safety specialists, systems engineers, design engineers, organizational psychologists, occupational health specialists and human-computer interaction specialists.
期刊最新文献
Differential effect of three types of exoskeletons and handling height on muscular activity, postural control and perceived effort during simulated bedside mobilization task. Navigating the complexity of emergency department care coordination: A qualitative exploration of adaptive strategies using a tabletop sandbox simulation. What is the optimal display range? Exploring the impacts of area and shape on in-vehicle head-up display efficiency. Development and validation of spatial disorientation scenarios using virtual reality and motion simulator. Evaluation of color in digital nuclear power plant control room displays.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1