Guideline concordant care for acute low back pain: A mixed-methods analysis of determinants of implementation

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE American Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2024.11.042
Kate I. Minick , Ashley Krueger , Amelia Millward , Kristy Veale , Joseph Kamerath , Devyn Woodfield , Preston Cook , Timothy R. Fowles , Joseph Bledsoe , Adam Balls , Raj Srivastava , Andrew J. Knighton
{"title":"Guideline concordant care for acute low back pain: A mixed-methods analysis of determinants of implementation","authors":"Kate I. Minick ,&nbsp;Ashley Krueger ,&nbsp;Amelia Millward ,&nbsp;Kristy Veale ,&nbsp;Joseph Kamerath ,&nbsp;Devyn Woodfield ,&nbsp;Preston Cook ,&nbsp;Timothy R. Fowles ,&nbsp;Joseph Bledsoe ,&nbsp;Adam Balls ,&nbsp;Raj Srivastava ,&nbsp;Andrew J. Knighton","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2024.11.042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>We conducted an explanatory, sequential mixed-methods study to measure variation in the use of imaging and physical therapy (PT) for acute low back pain (LBP) and to identify implementation determinants that might explain variation in use across 22 EDs and 27 urgent cares in urban and rural locations within a community-based health system.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We described the patient population and measured concordance with LBP guideline recommendations on imaging and PT referral from January–June 2023. We conducted key informant interviews with physicians and advanced practice providers (APPs), <em>n</em> = 30, from these 49 sites between July – September 2023 and performed content analysis to identify implementation determinants to guideline concordance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From January–June 30, 2023, 1047 Intermountain Health employed or affiliated physicians and APPs at the 22 adult EDs and 27 adult UCs cared for 8047 patient encounters involving acute LBP with no red flags. 29% of acute LBP patient encounters included an imaging order (ED: 43%; UC: 18%) and 5% included a PT order (ED: 7%; UC: 4%). 17 ED and 13 UC physicians and APPs participated in semi-structured interviews. Their patient encounters represent 6% of the overall study population (ED: 5%; UC: 7%) with order rates and patient population characteristics similar to the full study population. ED and UC clinicians were generally familiar with LBP guideline recommendations but varied significantly in their knowledge and beliefs of the appropriate application of guidelines in evaluation and treatment plans.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Guideline concordance for use of imaging and PT varied substantially across physicians and advance practice providers providing care at EDs and UC centers within a community-based health system. Implementation strategies that address barriers identified by this study, including varied understanding of the PT discipline, complex workflows for placing PT referrals, the medico-legal assurance that imaging provides, and the lack of feedback loops in ED and UC centers should be tested in future hybrid implementation-effectiveness trials to increase concordance to LBP guidelines and minimize harm related to overuse of imaging and underuse of conservative first-line treatment approaches.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"88 ","pages":"Pages 162-171"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735675724006193","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

We conducted an explanatory, sequential mixed-methods study to measure variation in the use of imaging and physical therapy (PT) for acute low back pain (LBP) and to identify implementation determinants that might explain variation in use across 22 EDs and 27 urgent cares in urban and rural locations within a community-based health system.

Methods

We described the patient population and measured concordance with LBP guideline recommendations on imaging and PT referral from January–June 2023. We conducted key informant interviews with physicians and advanced practice providers (APPs), n = 30, from these 49 sites between July – September 2023 and performed content analysis to identify implementation determinants to guideline concordance.

Results

From January–June 30, 2023, 1047 Intermountain Health employed or affiliated physicians and APPs at the 22 adult EDs and 27 adult UCs cared for 8047 patient encounters involving acute LBP with no red flags. 29% of acute LBP patient encounters included an imaging order (ED: 43%; UC: 18%) and 5% included a PT order (ED: 7%; UC: 4%). 17 ED and 13 UC physicians and APPs participated in semi-structured interviews. Their patient encounters represent 6% of the overall study population (ED: 5%; UC: 7%) with order rates and patient population characteristics similar to the full study population. ED and UC clinicians were generally familiar with LBP guideline recommendations but varied significantly in their knowledge and beliefs of the appropriate application of guidelines in evaluation and treatment plans.

Discussion

Guideline concordance for use of imaging and PT varied substantially across physicians and advance practice providers providing care at EDs and UC centers within a community-based health system. Implementation strategies that address barriers identified by this study, including varied understanding of the PT discipline, complex workflows for placing PT referrals, the medico-legal assurance that imaging provides, and the lack of feedback loops in ED and UC centers should be tested in future hybrid implementation-effectiveness trials to increase concordance to LBP guidelines and minimize harm related to overuse of imaging and underuse of conservative first-line treatment approaches.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性腰痛的协调护理指南:实施决定因素的混合方法分析。
简介:我们进行了一项解释性的、顺序的混合方法研究,以测量急性腰痛(LBP)成像和物理治疗(PT)使用的变化,并确定实施决定因素,这些决定因素可能解释社区卫生系统中城市和农村地区22个急诊科和27个紧急护理中心的使用变化。方法:我们描述了患者群体,并测量了2023年1月至6月LBP影像学和PT转诊指南建议的一致性。我们在2023年7月至9月期间对这49个地点的医生和高级实践提供者(app)进行了关键信息提供者访谈,n = 30,并进行了内容分析,以确定指南一致性的实施决定因素。结果:从2023年1月至6月30日,Intermountain Health在22个成人急诊科和27个成人UCs的1047名雇用或附属医生和app照顾了8047例急性腰痛患者,无危险信号。29%的急性腰痛患者就诊包括影像学检查(ED: 43%;UC: 18%)和5%包括PT订单(ED: 7%;加州大学:4%)。17名ED和13名UC医生和app参加了半结构化访谈。他们的患者接触占总研究人群的6% (ED: 5%;UC: 7%),订购率和患者群体特征与全部研究人群相似。ED和UC临床医生普遍熟悉腰痛指南建议,但在评估和治疗计划中适当应用指南的知识和信念方面存在显著差异。讨论:在以社区为基础的卫生系统中,在急诊科和UC中心提供护理的医生和高级实践提供者之间,使用成像和PT的指南一致性存在很大差异。解决本研究确定的障碍的实施策略,包括对PT学科的不同理解,PT转诊的复杂工作流程,影像学提供的医学-法律保证,ED和UC中心缺乏反馈回路,应该在未来的混合实施-有效性试验中进行测试,以增加与LBP指南的一致性,并最大限度地减少过度使用影像学和保守一线治疗方法使用不足带来的危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
730
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: A distinctive blend of practicality and scholarliness makes the American Journal of Emergency Medicine a key source for information on emergency medical care. Covering all activities concerned with emergency medicine, it is the journal to turn to for information to help increase the ability to understand, recognize and treat emergency conditions. Issues contain clinical articles, case reports, review articles, editorials, international notes, book reviews and more.
期刊最新文献
Buprenorphine initiation and rates of associated precipitated withdrawal in patients with fentanyl use in an urban emergency department Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound in detecting clavicle fractures Guideline concordant care for acute low back pain: A mixed-methods analysis of determinants of implementation An emergency medicine review: Multiple myeloma and its complications Time Isn't your FoCUS, do cardiac POCUS!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1