Time Isn't your FoCUS, do cardiac POCUS!

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE American Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2024.11.063
William Hunnicutt MD , Austin Barnett DO , Mirinda Ann Gormley PhD , John Eicken MD
{"title":"Time Isn't your FoCUS, do cardiac POCUS!","authors":"William Hunnicutt MD ,&nbsp;Austin Barnett DO ,&nbsp;Mirinda Ann Gormley PhD ,&nbsp;John Eicken MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2024.11.063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Physicians often cite time as a limitation to performing a focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) exam. The primary outcome of this study was to determine the amount of time to complete a quality FoCUS exam. Secondary outcomes evaluated time differences between different training levels.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>FoCUS exams were performed by emergency medicine (EM) residents, EM ultrasound (US) fellows, US fellowship-trained EM attendings, and EM attendings credentialed in US. Time to complete a FoCUS exam is the time difference between the first and final images acquired during the exam. Chi-square, <em>t</em>-tests, analysis of variance, and linear regression were performed to evaluate the data obtained in the study.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Six-hundred FoCUS exams were included in the study. Of these, 34 % had 3 views and 55.5 % had 4 views. Most studies (78.9 %) had a quality rating of 4 or 5. The average time for all groups to complete a FoCUS was 3.4 min. Residents took 3.8 min while attendings took 3.1 min. On average, PGY1 residents took 4.6 min, PGY2 residents took 4.0 min, and PGY3 residents took 2.8 min (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.0001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our study shows EM physicians take approximately 3.4 min to complete a quality FoCUS exam and residents took 45 s longer compared to attendings. For resident physicians, the amount of time it takes to complete a quality FoCUS exam decreases over the course of residency training. Our findings suggest the amount of time to complete a quality FoCUS exam should not be a limitation to perform a FoCUS exam.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"88 ","pages":"Pages 189-191"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735675724006491","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Physicians often cite time as a limitation to performing a focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) exam. The primary outcome of this study was to determine the amount of time to complete a quality FoCUS exam. Secondary outcomes evaluated time differences between different training levels.

Methods

FoCUS exams were performed by emergency medicine (EM) residents, EM ultrasound (US) fellows, US fellowship-trained EM attendings, and EM attendings credentialed in US. Time to complete a FoCUS exam is the time difference between the first and final images acquired during the exam. Chi-square, t-tests, analysis of variance, and linear regression were performed to evaluate the data obtained in the study.

Results

Six-hundred FoCUS exams were included in the study. Of these, 34 % had 3 views and 55.5 % had 4 views. Most studies (78.9 %) had a quality rating of 4 or 5. The average time for all groups to complete a FoCUS was 3.4 min. Residents took 3.8 min while attendings took 3.1 min. On average, PGY1 residents took 4.6 min, PGY2 residents took 4.0 min, and PGY3 residents took 2.8 min (p ≤ 0.0001).

Conclusions

Our study shows EM physicians take approximately 3.4 min to complete a quality FoCUS exam and residents took 45 s longer compared to attendings. For resident physicians, the amount of time it takes to complete a quality FoCUS exam decreases over the course of residency training. Our findings suggest the amount of time to complete a quality FoCUS exam should not be a limitation to perform a FoCUS exam.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Time Isn't your FoCUS, do cardiac POCUS!
背景:医生通常认为时间是进行聚焦心脏超声检查的限制因素。本研究的主要结果是确定完成高质量FoCUS检查所需的时间。次要结果评估不同训练水平之间的时间差异。方法:重点检查由急诊医学(EM)住院医师、EM超声(美国)研究员、美国奖学金培训的EM主治医师和在美国获得认证的EM主治医师进行。完成焦点考试的时间是在考试期间获得的第一张图像和最后一张图像之间的时间差。采用卡方检验、t检验、方差分析和线性回归对研究中获得的数据进行评价。结果:600份FoCUS考试被纳入研究。其中,34%的浏览量为3次,55.5%的浏览量为4次。大多数研究(78.9%)的质量评分为4或5。各组完成FoCUS的平均时间为3.4分钟,住院医师为3.8分钟,主治医师为3.1分钟。PGY1住院医师平均为4.6分钟,PGY2住院医师平均为4.0分钟,PGY3住院医师平均为2.8分钟(p≤0.0001)。结论:我们的研究表明,急诊医生完成一次高质量的FoCUS检查大约需要3.4分钟,住院医生比主治医生多花45分钟。对于住院医师来说,在住院医师培训的过程中,完成一次高质量的FoCUS考试所需的时间会减少。我们的研究结果表明,完成高质量焦点检查的时间不应成为进行焦点检查的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
730
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: A distinctive blend of practicality and scholarliness makes the American Journal of Emergency Medicine a key source for information on emergency medical care. Covering all activities concerned with emergency medicine, it is the journal to turn to for information to help increase the ability to understand, recognize and treat emergency conditions. Issues contain clinical articles, case reports, review articles, editorials, international notes, book reviews and more.
期刊最新文献
Buprenorphine initiation and rates of associated precipitated withdrawal in patients with fentanyl use in an urban emergency department Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound in detecting clavicle fractures Guideline concordant care for acute low back pain: A mixed-methods analysis of determinants of implementation An emergency medicine review: Multiple myeloma and its complications Time Isn't your FoCUS, do cardiac POCUS!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1