Kinetic and isotherm study for the adsorption of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) on activated carbon in the low ng/L range.

Chemosphere Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-21 DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143889
Marko Pranić, Livio Carlucci, Albert van der Wal, Jouke E Dykstra
{"title":"Kinetic and isotherm study for the adsorption of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) on activated carbon in the low ng/L range.","authors":"Marko Pranić, Livio Carlucci, Albert van der Wal, Jouke E Dykstra","doi":"10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Activated carbon adsorption is a widely used technology for the removal of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). However, the rapid breakthrough of PFAS in activated carbon filters poses a challenge to meet the very low allowable PFAS concentrations in drinking water, leading to high operational costs. In this study, we conducted batch isotherm and kinetic adsorption experiments using nine different types of PFAS molecules at concentrations typically found in water sources used for drinking water production (0.1-100 ng/L). The isotherm experiments at these low concentrations reveal that the maximum adsorption capacity of several PFAS is much lower than reported in literature. The estimated isotherms were included in a dynamic model that includes mass transport based on surface diffusion. This model effectively describes the experimental kinetic data, and the obtained surface diffusion coefficients indicate a very slow PFAS surface mobility. Additionally, our findings indicate that PFAS surface mobility decreases in scenarios with more available adsorption sites. Notably, mesoporous activated carbon, with its higher adsorption capacity, exhibits lower PFAS surface mobility than microporous carbon with lower PFAS adsorption capacity. Moreover, for both carbons, we observed a decrease in PFAS surface mobility at higher carbon loadings when the surface is less saturated with PFAS. Our findings suggest potential inherent limitations in activated carbon technology for PFAS removal under environmentally relevant conditions, as we observed lower adsorption capacities than previously reported at higher concentrations, and a decrease in PFAS surface mobility with more available adsorption sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":93933,"journal":{"name":"Chemosphere","volume":" ","pages":"143889"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemosphere","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143889","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Activated carbon adsorption is a widely used technology for the removal of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). However, the rapid breakthrough of PFAS in activated carbon filters poses a challenge to meet the very low allowable PFAS concentrations in drinking water, leading to high operational costs. In this study, we conducted batch isotherm and kinetic adsorption experiments using nine different types of PFAS molecules at concentrations typically found in water sources used for drinking water production (0.1-100 ng/L). The isotherm experiments at these low concentrations reveal that the maximum adsorption capacity of several PFAS is much lower than reported in literature. The estimated isotherms were included in a dynamic model that includes mass transport based on surface diffusion. This model effectively describes the experimental kinetic data, and the obtained surface diffusion coefficients indicate a very slow PFAS surface mobility. Additionally, our findings indicate that PFAS surface mobility decreases in scenarios with more available adsorption sites. Notably, mesoporous activated carbon, with its higher adsorption capacity, exhibits lower PFAS surface mobility than microporous carbon with lower PFAS adsorption capacity. Moreover, for both carbons, we observed a decrease in PFAS surface mobility at higher carbon loadings when the surface is less saturated with PFAS. Our findings suggest potential inherent limitations in activated carbon technology for PFAS removal under environmentally relevant conditions, as we observed lower adsorption capacities than previously reported at higher concentrations, and a decrease in PFAS surface mobility with more available adsorption sites.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低ng/L活性炭吸附全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质的动力学和等温线研究。
活性炭吸附是一种广泛应用于去除全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)的技术。然而,活性炭过滤器中PFAS的快速突破对满足饮用水中极低的PFAS允许浓度提出了挑战,导致运行成本高。在这项研究中,我们使用9种不同类型的PFAS分子进行了等温和动力学吸附实验,其浓度通常在饮用水生产的水源中发现(0.1 - 100 ng/L)。在这些低浓度下的等温实验表明,几种PFAS的最大吸附量远低于文献报道。估计的等温线包含在一个动态模型中,该模型包括基于表面扩散的质量输运。该模型有效地描述了实验动力学数据,得到的表面扩散系数表明PFAS的表面迁移速度非常慢。此外,我们的研究结果表明,在可用吸附位点较多的情况下,PFAS的表面迁移率会降低。值得注意的是,中孔活性炭具有较高的吸附能力,但其PFAS的表面迁移率低于吸附能力较低的微孔活性炭。此外,对于这两种碳,我们观察到在高碳负荷下,当表面PFAS饱和程度较低时,PFAS表面迁移率降低。我们的研究结果表明,在与环境相关的条件下,活性炭技术去除PFAS存在潜在的固有局限性,因为我们观察到高浓度下的吸附能力比之前报道的要低,并且随着可用吸附位点的增加,PFAS的表面迁移率会降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Retraction notice to "Simultaneous determination of hydrochlorothiazide, amlodipine, and telmisartan with spectrophotometric and HPLC green chemistry applications"[Chemosphere 303 (2022) 135074]. Heterogeneous catalysts for electro-Fenton degradation of cytostatic drug cytarabine. Kinetic and isotherm study for the adsorption of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) on activated carbon in the low ng/L range. Developmental toxicity of alkylated PAHs and substituted phenanthrenes: Structural nuances drive diverse toxicity and AHR activation. Unveiling the green synthesis of WO3 nanoparticles by using beetroot (Beta vulgaris) extract for photocatalytic oxidation of rhodamine B.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1