Strategic planning of geo-fenced micro-mobility facilities using reinforcement learning

Julian Teusch , Bruno Neumann Saavedra , Yannick Oskar Scherr , Jörg P. Müller
{"title":"Strategic planning of geo-fenced micro-mobility facilities using reinforcement learning","authors":"Julian Teusch ,&nbsp;Bruno Neumann Saavedra ,&nbsp;Yannick Oskar Scherr ,&nbsp;Jörg P. Müller","doi":"10.1016/j.tre.2024.103872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rise of Lightweight Shared Electric Vehicles (LSEVs) like e-scooters and e-bikes marks a shift towards sustainable urban mobility but brings challenges such as cluttering public spaces and distribution issues. Geo-fenced systems have emerged to mitigate these problems by restricting LSEVs to designated areas. However, integrating these infrastructures effectively remains challenging due to regulatory, convenience, and operational hurdles. In this study, we introduce a facility location optimization problem that strategically places Micro-Mobility Service Facilities (MMSFs) that enable charging, parking, and battery swapping of LSEVs. A utility model with benefit and loss functions accounts for the multiple objectives in this problem, including the impact of MMSF placement on service coverage and user convenience as well as financial and logistical costs. This model is uniquely customizable, allowing urban planners to modify the utility function’s parameters to align with specific local priorities and regulatory conditions. To solve this facility location optimization problem, we present a Deep Reinforcement Learning (RL) method that iteratively learns optimal placement strategies for Micro-Mobility Service Facilities by simulating interactions within real-world urban road networks and adapting to user demand patterns, regulatory constraints, and operational efficiencies. Our experiments in Austin and Louisville demonstrate that strategic placement of these facilities leads to substantial enhancements in infrastructure coverage, with improvements in parking demand by up to 163% in Austin and 72% in Louisville. These results underline the role of our approach in fostering more equitable and efficient urban mobility systems, significantly exceeding traditional simulation-based methods in both coverage and operational logistics. In particular, the results based on various budget scenarios reveal that service coverage and accessibility can be improved, with diminishing returns at higher budget levels due to demand saturation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","volume":"194 ","pages":"Article 103872"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554524004630","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rise of Lightweight Shared Electric Vehicles (LSEVs) like e-scooters and e-bikes marks a shift towards sustainable urban mobility but brings challenges such as cluttering public spaces and distribution issues. Geo-fenced systems have emerged to mitigate these problems by restricting LSEVs to designated areas. However, integrating these infrastructures effectively remains challenging due to regulatory, convenience, and operational hurdles. In this study, we introduce a facility location optimization problem that strategically places Micro-Mobility Service Facilities (MMSFs) that enable charging, parking, and battery swapping of LSEVs. A utility model with benefit and loss functions accounts for the multiple objectives in this problem, including the impact of MMSF placement on service coverage and user convenience as well as financial and logistical costs. This model is uniquely customizable, allowing urban planners to modify the utility function’s parameters to align with specific local priorities and regulatory conditions. To solve this facility location optimization problem, we present a Deep Reinforcement Learning (RL) method that iteratively learns optimal placement strategies for Micro-Mobility Service Facilities by simulating interactions within real-world urban road networks and adapting to user demand patterns, regulatory constraints, and operational efficiencies. Our experiments in Austin and Louisville demonstrate that strategic placement of these facilities leads to substantial enhancements in infrastructure coverage, with improvements in parking demand by up to 163% in Austin and 72% in Louisville. These results underline the role of our approach in fostering more equitable and efficient urban mobility systems, significantly exceeding traditional simulation-based methods in both coverage and operational logistics. In particular, the results based on various budget scenarios reveal that service coverage and accessibility can be improved, with diminishing returns at higher budget levels due to demand saturation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于强化学习的地理围栏微移动设施战略规划
电动滑板车和电动自行车等轻型共享电动汽车(lsev)的兴起标志着向可持续城市交通的转变,但也带来了公共空间拥挤和分布问题等挑战。地理围栏系统通过将lsev限制在指定区域来缓解这些问题。然而,由于监管、便利性和操作障碍,有效集成这些基础设施仍然具有挑战性。在本研究中,我们引入了一个设施位置优化问题,该问题战略性地放置微型移动服务设施(mmsf),使lsev能够充电,停车和更换电池。一种具有收益和损失函数的实用新型考虑了该问题中的多个目标,包括MMSF的放置对服务覆盖范围和用户便利性以及财务和后勤成本的影响。这个模型是独特的可定制的,允许城市规划者修改效用函数的参数,以配合特定的地方优先事项和监管条件。为了解决这一设施位置优化问题,我们提出了一种深度强化学习(RL)方法,通过模拟现实世界城市道路网络中的相互作用,并适应用户需求模式、监管约束和运营效率,迭代学习微移动服务设施的最佳放置策略。我们在奥斯汀和路易斯维尔的实验表明,这些设施的战略性布局导致基础设施覆盖率的大幅提高,奥斯汀和路易斯维尔的停车需求分别提高了163%和72%。这些结果强调了我们的方法在促进更公平和高效的城市交通系统方面的作用,在覆盖范围和运营物流方面都大大超过了传统的基于模拟的方法。特别是,基于各种预算情景的结果表明,服务覆盖率和可及性可以得到改善,由于需求饱和,在较高的预算水平上回报递减。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
16.00%
发文量
285
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review is a reputable journal that publishes high-quality articles covering a wide range of topics in the field of logistics and transportation research. The journal welcomes submissions on various subjects, including transport economics, transport infrastructure and investment appraisal, evaluation of public policies related to transportation, empirical and analytical studies of logistics management practices and performance, logistics and operations models, and logistics and supply chain management. Part E aims to provide informative and well-researched articles that contribute to the understanding and advancement of the field. The content of the journal is complementary to other prestigious journals in transportation research, such as Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies, Part D: Transport and Environment, and Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Together, these journals form a comprehensive and cohesive reference for current research in transportation science.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Green design and information sharing in a horizontally competitive supply chain Selection of R&D techniques: The influence of spillover effects and government subsidies Strategic planning of geo-fenced micro-mobility facilities using reinforcement learning A real-time prediction framework for energy consumption of electric buses using integrated Machine learning algorithms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1