Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Fear of Childbirth among Pregnant Women Attending Comprehensive Health Centers.

Q2 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Iranian Biomedical Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-01
Aida Hosseini, Zahedeh Khoshnazar, Mehran Rostami, Fatemeh Ramezani, Akram Sadat Nekuee, Ali Khaledian, Parisa Hosseini Koukamri
{"title":"Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Fear of Childbirth among Pregnant Women Attending Comprehensive Health Centers.","authors":"Aida Hosseini, Zahedeh Khoshnazar, Mehran Rostami, Fatemeh Ramezani, Akram Sadat Nekuee, Ali Khaledian, Parisa Hosseini Koukamri","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>One topic that has changed globally is fertility, which is influenced by factors such as the fear of childbirth, leading to the delay or avoidance of pregnancy. The global prevalence of fear of childbirth (FOC) has been reported to be 14%. The present study was designed and conducted to validate a questionnaire assessing fear of childbirth.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the FOC questionnaire were assessed through six stages: translation, evaluation of content validity, assessment of face validity, examination of construct validity, analysis of discriminant validity, and determination of reliability. A panel of experts (n = 10) and pregnant women (n = 10) evaluated the questionnaire items for content and face validity, respectively. The questionnaire consisted of nine elements, including fears such as the fear of losing sexual pleasure/attractiveness, fear of pain during natural childbirth, fear of embarrassment, fear of harming the baby, fear of cesarean section, fear of maternal or infant death, fear of inadequate pain relief, and fear of bodily harm, totaling 40 questions. A cross-sectional study employing a random sampling method was conducted with 300 pregnant women to establish construct validity. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and the McDonald's omega coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average age of the women in the study was 35.39 years. The content validity ratio, content validity index, and impact score for FOC were 0.98, 0.98, and 3.54, respectively, indicating strong content and face validity. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted on the 40 items to assess construct validity, revealing that nine factors accounted for 76.18% of the cumulative variance. The fit indices (CFI = 0.97, TLI = 0.95, χ2/df = 4.20, RMSEA = 0.04) supported the model's validity in confirmatory factor analysis. The average variance extracted values exceeding 0.5 indicate good convergent validity of the factors. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega coefficients, which yielded values of 0.90 and 0.92, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and discussion: </strong>Addressing the FOC as a public health concern necessitates targeted education. Therefore, it is essential to recognize these fears by utilizing a standardized tool to develop effective support strategies and suitable interventions to achieve this. This questionnaire serves as a novel instrument for evaluating the complex fear of childbirth. Its reliability and validity have been confirmed among Iranian women in the community, making it a valuable resource for identifying the concerns of pregnant women and formulating educational interventions tailored to these specific fears.</p>","PeriodicalId":14500,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Biomedical Journal","volume":"28 7","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Biomedical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: One topic that has changed globally is fertility, which is influenced by factors such as the fear of childbirth, leading to the delay or avoidance of pregnancy. The global prevalence of fear of childbirth (FOC) has been reported to be 14%. The present study was designed and conducted to validate a questionnaire assessing fear of childbirth.

Methods and materials: Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the FOC questionnaire were assessed through six stages: translation, evaluation of content validity, assessment of face validity, examination of construct validity, analysis of discriminant validity, and determination of reliability. A panel of experts (n = 10) and pregnant women (n = 10) evaluated the questionnaire items for content and face validity, respectively. The questionnaire consisted of nine elements, including fears such as the fear of losing sexual pleasure/attractiveness, fear of pain during natural childbirth, fear of embarrassment, fear of harming the baby, fear of cesarean section, fear of maternal or infant death, fear of inadequate pain relief, and fear of bodily harm, totaling 40 questions. A cross-sectional study employing a random sampling method was conducted with 300 pregnant women to establish construct validity. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and the McDonald's omega coefficients.

Results: The average age of the women in the study was 35.39 years. The content validity ratio, content validity index, and impact score for FOC were 0.98, 0.98, and 3.54, respectively, indicating strong content and face validity. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted on the 40 items to assess construct validity, revealing that nine factors accounted for 76.18% of the cumulative variance. The fit indices (CFI = 0.97, TLI = 0.95, χ2/df = 4.20, RMSEA = 0.04) supported the model's validity in confirmatory factor analysis. The average variance extracted values exceeding 0.5 indicate good convergent validity of the factors. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega coefficients, which yielded values of 0.90 and 0.92, respectively.

Conclusion and discussion: Addressing the FOC as a public health concern necessitates targeted education. Therefore, it is essential to recognize these fears by utilizing a standardized tool to develop effective support strategies and suitable interventions to achieve this. This questionnaire serves as a novel instrument for evaluating the complex fear of childbirth. Its reliability and validity have been confirmed among Iranian women in the community, making it a valuable resource for identifying the concerns of pregnant women and formulating educational interventions tailored to these specific fears.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Biomedical Journal
Iranian Biomedical Journal Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Anti-Acinetobacter baumannii Effect of Steroid Derivatives Isolated from Marine Coral, Sarcophyton tenuispiculatum Thomson & Dean. Comparison of DMFT in 6-12 Years Old Children with Autism Disorder Compared to Healthy Children. Effect of Two Types of Time-Restricted Eating on Glycemic, Lipid Indices and Weight of Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Advanced Prediction of PM10 Trends Using ANN-NARX Under CMIP6 Climate Change Scenarios. Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Fear of Childbirth among Pregnant Women Attending Comprehensive Health Centers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1