Validation of Spanish Version of the Spirituality and Spiritual Care Rating Scale (SSCRS-Sp) in Nursing Professionals.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Nursing Open Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1002/nop2.70115
M D Fernández-Pascual, A Reig-Ferrer, L Martínez-Rodríguez, J A Quesada-Rico, W Mcsherry, L Riquelme-Ros
{"title":"Validation of Spanish Version of the Spirituality and Spiritual Care Rating Scale (SSCRS-Sp) in Nursing Professionals.","authors":"M D Fernández-Pascual, A Reig-Ferrer, L Martínez-Rodríguez, J A Quesada-Rico, W Mcsherry, L Riquelme-Ros","doi":"10.1002/nop2.70115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the reliability and construct validity of the Spanish adaptation of the Spirituality and Spiritual Care Rating Scale (SSCRS) within the nursing professionals' context.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational and descriptive cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample consisted of N = 325 nursing professionals from various healthcare settings, including hospitals, clinics and community healthcare centres. Following translation and cultural adaption of the SSCRS, the scale underwent psychometric assessment of its construct validity through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Internal consistency analysis was also performed using a McDonald's omega. The reporting in this investigation adhered to the STROBE checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed a two-factor structure, with one factor closely aligning with one religiosity dimension and the other factor combining the spirituality, spiritual care and personalised care dimensions. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis did not provide an adequate fit to the data for both the two-factor solution found in the EFA and the four-factor solution proposed by McSherry, Draper, and Kendrick (2002). Even though the four-factor solution showed a slightly better fit than the two-factor solution, neither model achieved a satisfactory fit. The lack of formal education and confusion between religion and spirituality among healthcare professionals could have influenced the responses and interpretation of the results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings showed that the SSCRS-Sp demonstrated good internal consistency, indicating that the items in the scale are reliably measuring the targeted constructs. Further refinement and validation of the scale are needed to establish a robust factor structure in the target population.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>The SSCRS-Sp can be used to assess the nurses' perceptions of spirituality and spiritual care. The availability of this tool represents a significant step towards greater integration of the spiritual dimension of care within a holistic nursing care framework in Spanish-speaking countries.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>Nursing professionals responded to the research scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":48570,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Open","volume":"11 12","pages":"e70115"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11624440/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70115","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To examine the reliability and construct validity of the Spanish adaptation of the Spirituality and Spiritual Care Rating Scale (SSCRS) within the nursing professionals' context.

Design: Observational and descriptive cross-sectional study.

Methods: The sample consisted of N = 325 nursing professionals from various healthcare settings, including hospitals, clinics and community healthcare centres. Following translation and cultural adaption of the SSCRS, the scale underwent psychometric assessment of its construct validity through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Internal consistency analysis was also performed using a McDonald's omega. The reporting in this investigation adhered to the STROBE checklist.

Results: The exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed a two-factor structure, with one factor closely aligning with one religiosity dimension and the other factor combining the spirituality, spiritual care and personalised care dimensions. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis did not provide an adequate fit to the data for both the two-factor solution found in the EFA and the four-factor solution proposed by McSherry, Draper, and Kendrick (2002). Even though the four-factor solution showed a slightly better fit than the two-factor solution, neither model achieved a satisfactory fit. The lack of formal education and confusion between religion and spirituality among healthcare professionals could have influenced the responses and interpretation of the results.

Conclusion: The findings showed that the SSCRS-Sp demonstrated good internal consistency, indicating that the items in the scale are reliably measuring the targeted constructs. Further refinement and validation of the scale are needed to establish a robust factor structure in the target population.

Relevance to clinical practice: The SSCRS-Sp can be used to assess the nurses' perceptions of spirituality and spiritual care. The availability of this tool represents a significant step towards greater integration of the spiritual dimension of care within a holistic nursing care framework in Spanish-speaking countries.

Patient or public contribution: Nursing professionals responded to the research scale.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西班牙语版护理专业人员灵性和精神护理评定量表(ssrs - sp)的验证。
目的:检验西班牙语《精神与精神护理评定量表》(SSCRS)在护理专业背景下的信度和结构效度。设计:观察性和描述性横断面研究。方法:样本包括N = 325名来自不同医疗机构的护理专业人员,包括医院、诊所和社区医疗中心。在对SSCRS进行翻译和文化适应后,通过探索性和验证性因子分析对量表的构念效度进行心理测量学评估。内部一致性分析也使用麦当劳的欧米茄进行。本调查报告遵循STROBE检查表。结果:探索性因子分析(EFA)显示出一种双因子结构,一因子与宗教信仰维度密切相关,另一因子与灵性、精神关怀和个性化护理维度相结合。验证性因子分析的结果与EFA中发现的两因素解决方案和McSherry, Draper和Kendrick(2002)提出的四因素解决方案的数据都没有提供足够的拟合。尽管四因素解决方案的拟合程度略好于两因素解决方案,但两种模型都没有达到令人满意的拟合程度。医疗保健专业人员缺乏正规教育以及宗教和灵性之间的混淆可能影响了对结果的反应和解释。结论:调查结果显示,ssrs - sp量表具有良好的内部一致性,表明量表中的项目能够可靠地测量目标构念。为了在目标人群中建立稳健的因子结构,需要进一步细化和验证该量表。与临床实践的相关性:ssrs - sp可用于评估护士对精神和精神护理的认知。这一工具的可用性代表了西班牙语国家在整体护理框架内更大程度地整合护理的精神层面的重要一步。患者或公众贡献:护理专业人员对研究量表的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Beyond Intelligent Reflecting Surfaces: Reflective-Transmissive Metasurface Aided Communications for Full-Dimensional Coverage Extension
IF 6.8 2区 计算机科学IEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologyPub Date : 2020-09-18 DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2020.3024756
Shuhang Zhang;Hongliang Zhang;Boya Di;Yunhua Tan;Zhu Han;Lingyang Song
Coverage Analysis for mmWave Networks With Reflective and Transmissive Intelligent Surfaces
IF 8.9 1区 计算机科学IEEE Transactions on Wireless CommunicationsPub Date : 2024-10-31 DOI: 10.1109/TWC.2024.3486091
Jingyuan Zhang;Douglas M. Blough
来源期刊
Nursing Open
Nursing Open Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
298
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Open is a peer reviewed open access journal that welcomes articles on all aspects of nursing and midwifery practice, research, education and policy. We aim to publish articles that contribute to the art and science of nursing and which have a positive impact on health either locally, nationally, regionally or globally
期刊最新文献
A Little Boat Flopping About on the Ocean: The Lived Experience of Transitioning Early Career Nurses. Understanding and Managing Infusion Reactions and Hypophosphataemia With Intravenous Iron-A Nurses' Consensus Paper. Understanding the Relationships Between Fear of COVID-19, Depression, Loneliness, and Life Satisfaction in Türkiye: Testing Mediation and Moderation Effects. A Uniform for Narrating the Nurse in the Wheel of Time: An Interpretative Phenomenological Study. Interventions to Increase Thriving Amongst Older People in Care Homes and Factors Contributing to Their Thriving Experience-A Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1