Impact of short-term aircraft noise on cardiovascular disease risk in the area surrounding London Heathrow airport: the RISTANCO epidemiological study.

Xiangpu Gong, Nicole Itzkowitz, Calvin Jephcote, Kathryn Adams, Glory O Atilola, John Gulliver, Marta Blangiardo, Anna Hansell
{"title":"Impact of short-term aircraft noise on cardiovascular disease risk in the area surrounding London Heathrow airport: the RISTANCO epidemiological study.","authors":"Xiangpu Gong, Nicole Itzkowitz, Calvin Jephcote, Kathryn Adams, Glory O Atilola, John Gulliver, Marta Blangiardo, Anna Hansell","doi":"10.3310/UTCE9104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long-term exposure to aircraft noise has been associated with small increases in cardiovascular disease risk, but there are almost no short-term exposure studies.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Research questions were: Is there an association between short-term changes in exposure to aircraft noise and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality? What are the key effect modifiers? Is there variability in risk estimates between areas with consistent versus changing patterns of noise exposure? Do risk estimates differ when using different noise metrics?</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Descriptive analyses of noise levels and variability at different times of day, analyses of inequalities in noise exposure and case-crossover analyses of cardiovascular events in relation to aircraft noise exposure.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Area surrounding London Heathrow airport.</p><p><strong>Time period: </strong>2014-18.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Whole population in study area.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Cardiovascular disease hospitalisations and mortality.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Aircraft noise levels modelled using a standard noise model for: (1) daily equivalent continuous sound levels at different times of day; (2) daily number of events above defined noise thresholds (2018 only). National Health Service digital hospital admission records and Office for National Statistics mortality records for 2014-18 for cardiovascular outcomes, plus individual-level confounders available from healthcare records. Confounder data including road traffic noise (Leicester modelled), rail noise and air pollution (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs), area level deprivation and ethnicity (UK Census).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The morning shoulder period (06.00-07.00 hours) was the noisiest of all eight bands (mean: 50.92 dB). The morning shoulder period also had the third highest number of noisy events (flights) > 60 dB per day, with three events across postcodes on average. However, the highest number of noisy events occurred in daytime (highest between 07.00 and 15.00 hours, second highest 15.00 and 19.00 hours). To identify areas with high variability in aircraft noise exposure (due to changes in flight paths because of wind direction and airport operations), we used coefficients of variation (CoV). The period 24.00-04.30 hours had the highest mean CoV (67.33-74.16), followed by 04.30-06.00 hours and 23.00-24.00 hours. Postcodes in the least deprived quintiles of Carstairs index or avoidable death rate had the lowest noise levels. In case-crossover analyses, we observed increased risk for cardiovascular disease hospital admissions for evening noise 19.00-23.00 hours (odds ratio 1.005, 95% confidence interval 1.000 to 1.010 per 5 dB), but not for other periods or mortality. Further analyses suggested that increased risks were occurring in postcodes with low CoV for noise. We found effect modification by age, sex, ethnicity, deprivation and season.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The industry standard noise model, the Aviation Environmental Design Tool, used does not take account of wind direction, which may have led to some exposure misclassification.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed a comprehensive dataset of daily aircraft noise variability. We found small associations between cardiovascular hospitalisations (but not deaths) and evening aircraft noise levels, particularly in areas with low variability of noise.</p><p><strong>Future work: </strong>More studies are needed to understand the effect of noise variation and respite/relief on cardiovascular disease.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme (NIHR award ref: 15/192/13) and is published in full in <i>Public Health Research</i>; Vol. 12, No. 13. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.</p>","PeriodicalId":74615,"journal":{"name":"Public health research (Southampton, England)","volume":"12 13","pages":"1-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public health research (Southampton, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/UTCE9104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Long-term exposure to aircraft noise has been associated with small increases in cardiovascular disease risk, but there are almost no short-term exposure studies.

Objectives: Research questions were: Is there an association between short-term changes in exposure to aircraft noise and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality? What are the key effect modifiers? Is there variability in risk estimates between areas with consistent versus changing patterns of noise exposure? Do risk estimates differ when using different noise metrics?

Design: Descriptive analyses of noise levels and variability at different times of day, analyses of inequalities in noise exposure and case-crossover analyses of cardiovascular events in relation to aircraft noise exposure.

Setting: Area surrounding London Heathrow airport.

Time period: 2014-18.

Participants: Whole population in study area.

Main outcome measures: Cardiovascular disease hospitalisations and mortality.

Data sources: Aircraft noise levels modelled using a standard noise model for: (1) daily equivalent continuous sound levels at different times of day; (2) daily number of events above defined noise thresholds (2018 only). National Health Service digital hospital admission records and Office for National Statistics mortality records for 2014-18 for cardiovascular outcomes, plus individual-level confounders available from healthcare records. Confounder data including road traffic noise (Leicester modelled), rail noise and air pollution (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs), area level deprivation and ethnicity (UK Census).

Results: The morning shoulder period (06.00-07.00 hours) was the noisiest of all eight bands (mean: 50.92 dB). The morning shoulder period also had the third highest number of noisy events (flights) > 60 dB per day, with three events across postcodes on average. However, the highest number of noisy events occurred in daytime (highest between 07.00 and 15.00 hours, second highest 15.00 and 19.00 hours). To identify areas with high variability in aircraft noise exposure (due to changes in flight paths because of wind direction and airport operations), we used coefficients of variation (CoV). The period 24.00-04.30 hours had the highest mean CoV (67.33-74.16), followed by 04.30-06.00 hours and 23.00-24.00 hours. Postcodes in the least deprived quintiles of Carstairs index or avoidable death rate had the lowest noise levels. In case-crossover analyses, we observed increased risk for cardiovascular disease hospital admissions for evening noise 19.00-23.00 hours (odds ratio 1.005, 95% confidence interval 1.000 to 1.010 per 5 dB), but not for other periods or mortality. Further analyses suggested that increased risks were occurring in postcodes with low CoV for noise. We found effect modification by age, sex, ethnicity, deprivation and season.

Limitations: The industry standard noise model, the Aviation Environmental Design Tool, used does not take account of wind direction, which may have led to some exposure misclassification.

Conclusions: We developed a comprehensive dataset of daily aircraft noise variability. We found small associations between cardiovascular hospitalisations (but not deaths) and evening aircraft noise levels, particularly in areas with low variability of noise.

Future work: More studies are needed to understand the effect of noise variation and respite/relief on cardiovascular disease.

Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme (NIHR award ref: 15/192/13) and is published in full in Public Health Research; Vol. 12, No. 13. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伦敦希思罗机场周边地区短期飞机噪音对心血管疾病风险的影响:RISTANCO流行病学研究。
背景:长期暴露于飞机噪音与心血管疾病风险的小幅增加有关,但几乎没有短期暴露的研究。目的:研究问题是:暴露于飞机噪音的短期变化与心血管发病率和死亡率之间是否存在关联?什么是关键的效果修饰符?在噪音暴露模式不变与变化的地区之间,风险评估是否存在差异?当使用不同的噪音指标时,风险评估是否不同?设计:对一天中不同时间的噪音水平和变异性进行描述性分析,分析噪音暴露的不平等,并对与飞机噪音暴露相关的心血管事件进行病例交叉分析。环境:伦敦希思罗机场周边地区。时间:2014-18年。参与者:研究区域的全体人口。主要结局指标:心血管疾病住院和死亡率。数据来源:使用标准噪音模型模拟飞机噪音水平:(1)每天不同时间的每日等效连续声级;(2)超过定义噪声阈值的每日事件数(仅2018年)。英国国家卫生局(National Health Service)的数字住院记录和英国国家统计局(Office for National Statistics) 2014-18年心血管疾病死亡率记录,以及医疗记录中可获得的个人水平混杂因素。混杂数据包括道路交通噪音(莱斯特建模),铁路噪音和空气污染(环境,食品和农村事务部),地区贫困和种族(英国人口普查)。结果:早晨肩期(06.00 ~ 07.00)是8个波段中噪声最大的时段,平均为50.92 dB。早上的肩部时段也有第三高的噪音事件(航班),每天bb60 dB,平均每个邮政编码有三个事件。然而,噪声事件发生在白天的次数最多(在07.00 - 15.00时段最多,其次是15.00 - 19.00时段)。为了确定飞机噪声暴露的高变异性区域(由于风向和机场运行导致飞行路径的变化),我们使用了变异系数(CoV)。平均冠状病毒感染率最高的时段为24.00 ~ 04.30 h(67.33 ~ 74.16),其次为04.30 ~ 06.00和23.00 ~ 24.00;Carstairs指数或可避免死亡率最低的五分之一的邮政编码的噪音水平最低。在病例交叉分析中,我们观察到夜间噪音19.00-23.00小时导致心血管疾病住院的风险增加(优势比1.005,95%置信区间1.000 - 1.010 / 5 dB),但其他时段或死亡率没有增加。进一步的分析表明,在低冠状病毒感染的邮政编码地区,风险增加。我们发现,年龄、性别、种族、剥夺和季节会改变效果。限制:使用的行业标准噪音模型,即航空环境设计工具,没有考虑到风向,这可能导致一些暴露错误分类。结论:我们建立了一个全面的飞机噪声日变化数据集。我们发现心血管住院(但不是死亡)与夜间飞机噪音水平之间存在很小的关联,特别是在噪音变异性较低的地区。未来的工作:需要更多的研究来了解噪音变化和喘息/缓解对心血管疾病的影响。资助:该奖项由国家卫生与保健研究所(NIHR)公共卫生研究方案(NIHR奖号:15/192/13)资助,全文发表在《公共卫生研究》上;第十二卷,第13号有关进一步的奖励信息,请参阅美国国立卫生研究院资助和奖励网站。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Innovation and diversity in public health team engagement in local alcohol premises licensing: qualitative interview findings from the ExILEnS study. Public engagement to refine a whole-school intervention to promote adolescent mental health. Interventions to improve mental health and well-being in care-experienced children and young people aged less than 25: the CHIMES systematic review. Emotional literacy programme in special schools for children with a learning disability in England: the ZF-SEND feasibility RCT. Impact of short-term aircraft noise on cardiovascular disease risk in the area surrounding London Heathrow airport: the RISTANCO epidemiological study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1