Subtyping strokes using blood-based protein biomarkers: A high-throughput proteomics and machine learning approach.

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL European Journal of Clinical Investigation Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1111/eci.14372
Shubham Misra, Praveen Singh, Shantanu Sengupta, Manoj Kushwaha, Zuhaibur Rahman, Divya Bhalla, Pumanshi Talwar, Manabesh Nath, Rahul Chakraborty, Pradeep Kumar, Amit Kumar, Praveen Aggarwal, Achal K Srivastava, Awadh K Pandit, Dheeraj Mohania, Kameshwar Prasad, Nishant K Mishra, Deepti Vibha
{"title":"Subtyping strokes using blood-based protein biomarkers: A high-throughput proteomics and machine learning approach.","authors":"Shubham Misra, Praveen Singh, Shantanu Sengupta, Manoj Kushwaha, Zuhaibur Rahman, Divya Bhalla, Pumanshi Talwar, Manabesh Nath, Rahul Chakraborty, Pradeep Kumar, Amit Kumar, Praveen Aggarwal, Achal K Srivastava, Awadh K Pandit, Dheeraj Mohania, Kameshwar Prasad, Nishant K Mishra, Deepti Vibha","doi":"10.1111/eci.14372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rapid diagnosis of stroke and its subtypes is critical in early stages. We aimed to discover and validate blood-based protein biomarkers to differentiate ischemic stroke (IS) from intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) using high-throughput proteomics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected serum samples within 24 h from acute stroke (IS & ICH) and mimics patients. In the discovery phase, SWATH-MS proteomics identified differentially expressed proteins, which were validated using targeted proteomics in the validation phase. We conducted interaction network and pathway analyses using Cytoscape 3.10.0. We determined cut-off points using the Youden Index. We developed three prediction models using multivariable logistic regression analyses. We assessed the model performance using statistical tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 20 IS and 20 ICH in the discovery phase and 150 IS, 150 ICH, and six stroke mimics in the validation phase. We quantified 375 proteins using SWATH-MS. Between IS and ICH, we discovered 20 differentially expressed proteins. In the validation phase, the combined prediction model including three biomarkers: GFAP (aOR 0.04; 95%CI .02-.11), MMP-9 (aOR .09; .03-.28), APO-C1 (aOR 5.76; 2.66-12.47) and clinical variables independently differentiated IS from ICH (accuracy: 92%, negative predictive value: 94%). Adding biomarkers to clinical variables improved discrimination by 26% (p < .001). Additionally, nine biomarkers differentiated IS from ICH within 6 h, while three biomarkers differentiated IS from mimics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrated that GFAP, MMP-9 and APO-C1 biomarkers independently differentiated IS from ICH within 24 h and significantly improved the discrimination ability of prediction models. Temporal profiling of these biomarkers in the acute phase of stroke is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":12013,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"e14372"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.14372","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rapid diagnosis of stroke and its subtypes is critical in early stages. We aimed to discover and validate blood-based protein biomarkers to differentiate ischemic stroke (IS) from intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) using high-throughput proteomics.

Methods: We collected serum samples within 24 h from acute stroke (IS & ICH) and mimics patients. In the discovery phase, SWATH-MS proteomics identified differentially expressed proteins, which were validated using targeted proteomics in the validation phase. We conducted interaction network and pathway analyses using Cytoscape 3.10.0. We determined cut-off points using the Youden Index. We developed three prediction models using multivariable logistic regression analyses. We assessed the model performance using statistical tests.

Results: We included 20 IS and 20 ICH in the discovery phase and 150 IS, 150 ICH, and six stroke mimics in the validation phase. We quantified 375 proteins using SWATH-MS. Between IS and ICH, we discovered 20 differentially expressed proteins. In the validation phase, the combined prediction model including three biomarkers: GFAP (aOR 0.04; 95%CI .02-.11), MMP-9 (aOR .09; .03-.28), APO-C1 (aOR 5.76; 2.66-12.47) and clinical variables independently differentiated IS from ICH (accuracy: 92%, negative predictive value: 94%). Adding biomarkers to clinical variables improved discrimination by 26% (p < .001). Additionally, nine biomarkers differentiated IS from ICH within 6 h, while three biomarkers differentiated IS from mimics.

Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that GFAP, MMP-9 and APO-C1 biomarkers independently differentiated IS from ICH within 24 h and significantly improved the discrimination ability of prediction models. Temporal profiling of these biomarkers in the acute phase of stroke is warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
3.60%
发文量
192
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: EJCI considers any original contribution from the most sophisticated basic molecular sciences to applied clinical and translational research and evidence-based medicine across a broad range of subspecialties. The EJCI publishes reports of high-quality research that pertain to the genetic, molecular, cellular, or physiological basis of human biology and disease, as well as research that addresses prevalence, diagnosis, course, treatment, and prevention of disease. We are primarily interested in studies directly pertinent to humans, but submission of robust in vitro and animal work is also encouraged. Interdisciplinary work and research using innovative methods and combinations of laboratory, clinical, and epidemiological methodologies and techniques is of great interest to the journal. Several categories of manuscripts (for detailed description see below) are considered: editorials, original articles (also including randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses), reviews (narrative reviews), opinion articles (including debates, perspectives and commentaries); and letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease as long-term predictors of cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease. Inflammation, lipids and cardiovascular risk: The quest for improving risk stratification and prognosis in ischemic heart disease. Residual risk prediction in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation using machine learning: A report from the GLORIA-AF registry phase II/III. Subtyping strokes using blood-based protein biomarkers: A high-throughput proteomics and machine learning approach. Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1