Impact of sirolimus on long-term adverse cardiovascular outcomes in kidney transplant recipients: A nationwide cohort study.

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL European Journal of Clinical Investigation Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1111/eci.70027
Jinhyun Park, Wonhui Choi, Jinseub Hwang, Ha Young Jang, Yun Kim, Young-Mi Ah, Jin-Won Kwon, Kyung Hee Choi, Yun-Kyoung Song
{"title":"Impact of sirolimus on long-term adverse cardiovascular outcomes in kidney transplant recipients: A nationwide cohort study.","authors":"Jinhyun Park, Wonhui Choi, Jinseub Hwang, Ha Young Jang, Yun Kim, Young-Mi Ah, Jin-Won Kwon, Kyung Hee Choi, Yun-Kyoung Song","doi":"10.1111/eci.70027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at high risk for cardiovascular disease due to the long-term use of immunosuppressive therapy. This study aims to evaluate the long-term impact of sirolimus on cardiovascular outcomes in Korean KTRs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From a cohort of 7180 eligible KTRs identified from 2010 to 2021, 387 KTRs who received sirolimus were included. To control for confounding variables, propensity score matching was applied, and the landmark method was used to address immortal time bias. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, ischaemic stroke and all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis showed no significant difference in MACE between the sirolimus-treated and untreated groups (hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% confidence interval, .77-2.55), despite a higher incidence of dyslipidaemia in the sirolimus-treated group. However, subgroup analysis revealed an increased MACE risk in KTRs with pre-transplant congestive heart failure (CHF) who were treated with sirolimus (hazard ratio, 6.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.78-21.74), while no significant differences were found in other subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that while sirolimus can be a viable option for immunosuppression, it should be used cautiously in those with pre-existing CHF.</p>","PeriodicalId":12013,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"e70027"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.70027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at high risk for cardiovascular disease due to the long-term use of immunosuppressive therapy. This study aims to evaluate the long-term impact of sirolimus on cardiovascular outcomes in Korean KTRs.

Methods: From a cohort of 7180 eligible KTRs identified from 2010 to 2021, 387 KTRs who received sirolimus were included. To control for confounding variables, propensity score matching was applied, and the landmark method was used to address immortal time bias. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, ischaemic stroke and all-cause mortality.

Results: The analysis showed no significant difference in MACE between the sirolimus-treated and untreated groups (hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% confidence interval, .77-2.55), despite a higher incidence of dyslipidaemia in the sirolimus-treated group. However, subgroup analysis revealed an increased MACE risk in KTRs with pre-transplant congestive heart failure (CHF) who were treated with sirolimus (hazard ratio, 6.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.78-21.74), while no significant differences were found in other subgroups.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that while sirolimus can be a viable option for immunosuppression, it should be used cautiously in those with pre-existing CHF.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
3.60%
发文量
192
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: EJCI considers any original contribution from the most sophisticated basic molecular sciences to applied clinical and translational research and evidence-based medicine across a broad range of subspecialties. The EJCI publishes reports of high-quality research that pertain to the genetic, molecular, cellular, or physiological basis of human biology and disease, as well as research that addresses prevalence, diagnosis, course, treatment, and prevention of disease. We are primarily interested in studies directly pertinent to humans, but submission of robust in vitro and animal work is also encouraged. Interdisciplinary work and research using innovative methods and combinations of laboratory, clinical, and epidemiological methodologies and techniques is of great interest to the journal. Several categories of manuscripts (for detailed description see below) are considered: editorials, original articles (also including randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses), reviews (narrative reviews), opinion articles (including debates, perspectives and commentaries); and letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Impact of sirolimus on long-term adverse cardiovascular outcomes in kidney transplant recipients: A nationwide cohort study. Myocardial perfusion imaging in advanced coronary artery disease. Effectiveness of hypoxic versus normoxic exercise on cardiovascular function in people without cardiovascular diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cystatin C-estimated GFR correlates with endothelial function improvements following bariatric surgery. Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1