Roel Hoek, Pepijn A van Diemen, Yvemarie B O Somsen, Ruben W de Winter, Ruurt A Jukema, Jorge E Dahdal, Pieter G Raijmakers, Roel S Driessen, Ibrahim Danad, Paul Knaapen
{"title":"Myocardial perfusion imaging in advanced coronary artery disease.","authors":"Roel Hoek, Pepijn A van Diemen, Yvemarie B O Somsen, Ruben W de Winter, Ruurt A Jukema, Jorge E Dahdal, Pieter G Raijmakers, Roel S Driessen, Ibrahim Danad, Paul Knaapen","doi":"10.1111/eci.70024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is widely adapted as a noninvasive technique to assess the presence and extent of ischemia in patients with symptoms suggestive of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). However, as CAD advances, several factors can complicate the interpretation of MPI, subsequently impacting clinical decision-making. This review focuses on the utility of MPI by means of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with advanced CAD-the latter characterized by documented CAD (i.e. prior myocardial infarction [MI] and/or percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]), prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or the presence of a chronic total occlusion (CTO). It will discuss factors impacting the interpretation of MPI, the diagnostic performance for detecting obstructive CAD and coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), as well as the role of MPI in guiding revascularization.</p>","PeriodicalId":12013,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"e70024"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.70024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is widely adapted as a noninvasive technique to assess the presence and extent of ischemia in patients with symptoms suggestive of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). However, as CAD advances, several factors can complicate the interpretation of MPI, subsequently impacting clinical decision-making. This review focuses on the utility of MPI by means of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with advanced CAD-the latter characterized by documented CAD (i.e. prior myocardial infarction [MI] and/or percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]), prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or the presence of a chronic total occlusion (CTO). It will discuss factors impacting the interpretation of MPI, the diagnostic performance for detecting obstructive CAD and coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), as well as the role of MPI in guiding revascularization.
期刊介绍:
EJCI considers any original contribution from the most sophisticated basic molecular sciences to applied clinical and translational research and evidence-based medicine across a broad range of subspecialties. The EJCI publishes reports of high-quality research that pertain to the genetic, molecular, cellular, or physiological basis of human biology and disease, as well as research that addresses prevalence, diagnosis, course, treatment, and prevention of disease. We are primarily interested in studies directly pertinent to humans, but submission of robust in vitro and animal work is also encouraged. Interdisciplinary work and research using innovative methods and combinations of laboratory, clinical, and epidemiological methodologies and techniques is of great interest to the journal. Several categories of manuscripts (for detailed description see below) are considered: editorials, original articles (also including randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses), reviews (narrative reviews), opinion articles (including debates, perspectives and commentaries); and letters to the Editor.