The radiological features of HPV-positive vs HPV-negative OPSCC at a South African hospital.

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING SA Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2024-11-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajr.v28i1.2976
Anand Naranbhai, Amir Afrogheh, Suzanne O'Hagan, Johan Grobbelaar, Leon Janse van Rensburg
{"title":"The radiological features of HPV-positive vs HPV-negative OPSCC at a South African hospital.","authors":"Anand Naranbhai, Amir Afrogheh, Suzanne O'Hagan, Johan Grobbelaar, Leon Janse van Rensburg","doi":"10.4102/sajr.v28i1.2976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies have found that, at presentation, human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has a less advanced primary tumour, more advanced lymph node spread and commonly has cystic metastatic lymph nodes in comparison to HPV-negative OPSCC.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the radiological features of HPV-positive and HPV-negative OPSCC in South African patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at a large South African hospital. Eligibility required a histologically proven OPSCC between 2007 and 2023; a p16 antigen test and, if positive, a confirmatory HPV DNA PCR test and a baseline pre-treatment contrast enhanced neck CT scan. All eligible HPV-positive OPSCC patients and a random sample of eligible HPV-negative OPSCC patients were enrolled.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one HPV-positive and 55 HPV-negative OPSCC patients were recruited. There was no statistically significant difference in the tumour epicentre location, local advancement (≥ T3 in 67% and 71%, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.54), mean primary tumour size (41 mm vs. 39 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.73), lymph node spread (bilateral or more in 67% vs. 82%, <i>p</i> = 0.22) or morphologically cystic lymph nodes (10% and 4%, <i>p</i> = 0.61).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no statistically significant difference in the CT imaging appearances of HPV-positive and HPV-negative OPSCC in the studied sample of South African patients.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>This study documents the radiological features of OPSCC in a small South African sample population, where HPV-positive and HPV-negative OPSCC could not be distinguished on CT criteria and did not display the classic features described in the literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":43442,"journal":{"name":"SA Journal of Radiology","volume":"28 1","pages":"2976"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11621980/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SA Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajr.v28i1.2976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Studies have found that, at presentation, human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has a less advanced primary tumour, more advanced lymph node spread and commonly has cystic metastatic lymph nodes in comparison to HPV-negative OPSCC.

Objectives: To compare the radiological features of HPV-positive and HPV-negative OPSCC in South African patients.

Method: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at a large South African hospital. Eligibility required a histologically proven OPSCC between 2007 and 2023; a p16 antigen test and, if positive, a confirmatory HPV DNA PCR test and a baseline pre-treatment contrast enhanced neck CT scan. All eligible HPV-positive OPSCC patients and a random sample of eligible HPV-negative OPSCC patients were enrolled.

Results: Twenty-one HPV-positive and 55 HPV-negative OPSCC patients were recruited. There was no statistically significant difference in the tumour epicentre location, local advancement (≥ T3 in 67% and 71%, respectively, p = 0.54), mean primary tumour size (41 mm vs. 39 mm, p = 0.73), lymph node spread (bilateral or more in 67% vs. 82%, p = 0.22) or morphologically cystic lymph nodes (10% and 4%, p = 0.61).

Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference in the CT imaging appearances of HPV-positive and HPV-negative OPSCC in the studied sample of South African patients.

Contribution: This study documents the radiological features of OPSCC in a small South African sample population, where HPV-positive and HPV-negative OPSCC could not be distinguished on CT criteria and did not display the classic features described in the literature.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SA Journal of Radiology
SA Journal of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The SA Journal of Radiology is the official journal of the Radiological Society of South Africa and the Professional Association of Radiologists in South Africa and Namibia. The SA Journal of Radiology is a general diagnostic radiological journal which carries original research and review articles, pictorial essays, case reports, letters, editorials, radiological practice and other radiological articles.
期刊最新文献
Thinking outside tuberculosis: A case of widespread active disseminated cysticercosis. Sustainable radiology in South Africa. Diagnostic performance of dual-energy CT with electron-density reconstruction for lumbar disc herniation. The radiological features of HPV-positive vs HPV-negative OPSCC at a South African hospital. Clinical diagnostic reference levels and image quality metrics for CT in oncology patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1