{"title":"The bittersweet economics of different cacao production systems in Colombia, Ecuador and Peru","authors":"Andrés Charry , Carolay Perea , Karen Ramírez , Guillermo Zambrano , Fredy Yovera , Adriana Santos , Tito Jiménez , Miguel Romero , Mark Lundy , Marcela Quintero , Mirjam Pulleman","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>Cacao production takes place in diverse environments and agricultural systems, with its performance and income generation potential depending on multiple contextual factors. The crop has been promoted among smallholders in South America as a driver for sustainable rural development, but a systematic comparison of the economic performance of diverse cacao production systems in this region was missing, which led to a lack of consistency and clarity on the conditions that enable the crops' success in terms of profitability and income generation for farmers.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>We aimed to understand the economic performance of different cacao production systems from Colombia, Ecuador and Perú, and the factors that affect their profitability and income generation potential with regards to poverty and living income benchmarks under varying contexts.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>We employed the ‘typical farm approach’ to perform a comparative analysis of fifteen different cacao production systems from six distinct agroecological regions from Colombia, Ecuador and Perú.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>Eight out of the fifteen systems analyzed were found to be economically viable, while the remaining systems generate considerable losses. Positive outcomes depend on a combination of factors including sufficient prices, yields and land availability, adequate labor allocation, timely diversification, subsidies and low costs of productive factors. Considering those factors, we identified minimum conditions for achieving profitability and living incomes.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>Our findings provide essential information to decision makers on the limitations of cacao productive systems for achieving a living income, as well as the type of diversification, minimum prices, area and yields that could enhance their economic sustainability. Based on our findings, we discuss the relevance of subsidies for improving the system's performance. Finally, we suggest the use of different indicators and standardized assumptions to allow more reliable comparisons between cacao production systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"224 ","pages":"Article 104235"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24003858","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
CONTEXT
Cacao production takes place in diverse environments and agricultural systems, with its performance and income generation potential depending on multiple contextual factors. The crop has been promoted among smallholders in South America as a driver for sustainable rural development, but a systematic comparison of the economic performance of diverse cacao production systems in this region was missing, which led to a lack of consistency and clarity on the conditions that enable the crops' success in terms of profitability and income generation for farmers.
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to understand the economic performance of different cacao production systems from Colombia, Ecuador and Perú, and the factors that affect their profitability and income generation potential with regards to poverty and living income benchmarks under varying contexts.
METHODS
We employed the ‘typical farm approach’ to perform a comparative analysis of fifteen different cacao production systems from six distinct agroecological regions from Colombia, Ecuador and Perú.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
Eight out of the fifteen systems analyzed were found to be economically viable, while the remaining systems generate considerable losses. Positive outcomes depend on a combination of factors including sufficient prices, yields and land availability, adequate labor allocation, timely diversification, subsidies and low costs of productive factors. Considering those factors, we identified minimum conditions for achieving profitability and living incomes.
SIGNIFICANCE
Our findings provide essential information to decision makers on the limitations of cacao productive systems for achieving a living income, as well as the type of diversification, minimum prices, area and yields that could enhance their economic sustainability. Based on our findings, we discuss the relevance of subsidies for improving the system's performance. Finally, we suggest the use of different indicators and standardized assumptions to allow more reliable comparisons between cacao production systems.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments.
The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas:
Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making;
The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment;
Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems;
Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.