Temporal dysregulation of the somatomotor network in agitated depression.

IF 4.1 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Brain communications Pub Date : 2024-11-26 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/braincomms/fcae425
Qunjun Liang, Ziyun Xu, Shengli Chen, Shiwei Lin, Xiaoshan Lin, Ying Li, Yingli Zhang, Bo Peng, Gangqiang Hou, Yingwei Qiu
{"title":"Temporal dysregulation of the somatomotor network in agitated depression.","authors":"Qunjun Liang, Ziyun Xu, Shengli Chen, Shiwei Lin, Xiaoshan Lin, Ying Li, Yingli Zhang, Bo Peng, Gangqiang Hou, Yingwei Qiu","doi":"10.1093/braincomms/fcae425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Agitated depression (A-MDD) is a severe subtype of major depressive disorder, with an increased risk of suicidality and the potential to evolve into bipolar disorder. Despite its clinical significance, the neural basis remains unclear. We hypothesize that psychomotor agitation, marked by pressured speech and racing thoughts, is linked to disruptions in brain dynamics. To test this hypothesis, we examined brain dynamics using time delay estimation and edge-centre time series, as well as dynamic connections between the somatomotor network (SMN) and the default mode network in 44 patients with A-MDD, 75 with non-agitated MDD (NA-MDD), and 94 healthy controls. Our results revealed that the neural co-activity duration was shorter in the A-MDD group compared with both the NA-MDD and controls (A-MDD versus NA-MDD: <i>t</i> = 2.295; A-MDD versus controls: <i>t</i> = 2.192, all <i>P</i> < 0.05). In addition, the dynamic of neural fluctuation in SMN altered in the A-MDD group than in the NA-MDD group (<i>t</i> = -2.616, <i>P</i> = 0.011) and was correlated with agitation severity (<i>β</i> = -0.228, <i>P</i> = 0.011). The inter-network connection was reduced in the A-MDD group compared with the control group (<i>t</i> = 2.102, <i>P</i> = 0.037), especially at low-amplitude time points (<i>t</i> = 2.139, <i>P</i> = 0.034). These findings indicate rapid neural fluctuations and disrupted dynamic coupling between the SMN and default mode network in A-MDD, potentially underlying the psychomotor agitation characteristic of this subtype. These insights contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the heterogeneity of depression and have implications for differential diagnosis and treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":93915,"journal":{"name":"Brain communications","volume":"6 6","pages":"fcae425"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11630518/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcae425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agitated depression (A-MDD) is a severe subtype of major depressive disorder, with an increased risk of suicidality and the potential to evolve into bipolar disorder. Despite its clinical significance, the neural basis remains unclear. We hypothesize that psychomotor agitation, marked by pressured speech and racing thoughts, is linked to disruptions in brain dynamics. To test this hypothesis, we examined brain dynamics using time delay estimation and edge-centre time series, as well as dynamic connections between the somatomotor network (SMN) and the default mode network in 44 patients with A-MDD, 75 with non-agitated MDD (NA-MDD), and 94 healthy controls. Our results revealed that the neural co-activity duration was shorter in the A-MDD group compared with both the NA-MDD and controls (A-MDD versus NA-MDD: t = 2.295; A-MDD versus controls: t = 2.192, all P < 0.05). In addition, the dynamic of neural fluctuation in SMN altered in the A-MDD group than in the NA-MDD group (t = -2.616, P = 0.011) and was correlated with agitation severity (β = -0.228, P = 0.011). The inter-network connection was reduced in the A-MDD group compared with the control group (t = 2.102, P = 0.037), especially at low-amplitude time points (t = 2.139, P = 0.034). These findings indicate rapid neural fluctuations and disrupted dynamic coupling between the SMN and default mode network in A-MDD, potentially underlying the psychomotor agitation characteristic of this subtype. These insights contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the heterogeneity of depression and have implications for differential diagnosis and treatment strategies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
激动性抑郁症中躯体运动网络的时间失调。
躁动性抑郁症(a - mdd)是重度抑郁症的一种严重亚型,自杀风险增加,并有可能演变为双相情感障碍。尽管其临床意义,神经基础仍不清楚。我们假设精神运动性躁动,以紧张的言语和快速的思维为特征,与大脑动力学的中断有关。为了验证这一假设,我们使用时间延迟估计和边缘中心时间序列检查了44名A-MDD患者、75名非激动型MDD患者(NA-MDD)和94名健康对照者的大脑动力学,以及体运动网络(SMN)和默认模式网络之间的动态连接。我们的研究结果显示,与NA-MDD和对照组相比,A-MDD组的神经协同活动持续时间更短(A-MDD与NA-MDD: t = 2.295;A-MDD与对照组比较:t = 2.192,均P < 0.05)。此外,A-MDD组的SMN神经波动动态比NA-MDD组改变(t = -2.616, P = 0.011),并与躁动严重程度相关(β = -0.228, P = 0.011)。与对照组相比,A-MDD组的网络间连接减少(t = 2.102, P = 0.037),特别是在低振幅时间点(t = 2.139, P = 0.034)。这些发现表明,在A-MDD中,快速的神经波动和SMN与默认模式网络之间的动态耦合中断,可能是该亚型精神运动性躁动特征的基础。这些见解有助于更细致入微地了解抑郁症的异质性,并对鉴别诊断和治疗策略具有指导意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
The challenge of long-term stroke outcome prediction and how statistical correlates do not imply predictive value. Early subacute frontal callosal microstructure and language outcomes after stroke. Evaluating conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease with structural MRI: a machine learning study. Adult phenotypes of genetic developmental and epileptic encephalopathies. Multidimensional structural analyses revealed a correlation between thalamic atrophy and white matter degeneration in idiopathic dystonia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1