Impact of frailty, malnutrition and socioeconomic status on perioperative outcomes.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Age and ageing Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1093/ageing/afae263
Brandon Stretton, Andrew E C Booth, Joshua Kovoor, Aashray Gupta, Suzanne Edwards, Tom Hugh, John Maddison, Nicholas J Talley, Mark Plummer, Emily Meyer, Michael Horowitz, Savio Barreto, Robert Padbury, Stephen Bacchi, Guy Maddern, Mark Boyd
{"title":"Impact of frailty, malnutrition and socioeconomic status on perioperative outcomes.","authors":"Brandon Stretton, Andrew E C Booth, Joshua Kovoor, Aashray Gupta, Suzanne Edwards, Tom Hugh, John Maddison, Nicholas J Talley, Mark Plummer, Emily Meyer, Michael Horowitz, Savio Barreto, Robert Padbury, Stephen Bacchi, Guy Maddern, Mark Boyd","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afae263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Frailty, malnutrition and low socioeconomic status may mutually perpetuate each other in a self-reinforcing and interdependent manner. The intertwined nature of these factors may be overlooked when investigating impacts on perioperative outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the impact of frailty, malnutrition and socioeconomic status on perioperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicentre cohort study involving six Australian tertiary hospitals was undertaken. All consecutive surgical patients who underwent an operation were included. Frailty was defined by the Hospital Frailty Risk Score, malnutrition by the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) and low socioeconomic status by the Index of Relative Socioeconomic Disadvantage. Linear mixed-effects and binary logistic generalised estimated equation models were performed for the outcomes: inpatient mortality, length of stay, 30-day readmission and re-operation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 21 976 patients were included. After controlling for confounders, malnutrition and socioeconomic status, patients at high risk of frailty have a mean hospital length of stay 3.46 times longer (mean ratio = 3.46; 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.20, 3.73; P value < .001), odds of 30-day readmission 2.4 times higher (odds ratio = 2.40; 95% CI: 2.19, 2.63; P value < .001) and odds of in-hospital mortality 12.89 times greater than patients with low risk of frailty (odds ratio = 12.89; 95% CI: 4.51, 36.69; P value < .001). Elevated MUST scores were also significantly associated with worse outcomes, but to a lesser extent. Socioeconomic status had no association with outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Perioperative risk evaluation should consider both frailty and malnutrition as separate, significant risk factors. Despite strong causal links with frailty and malnutrition, socioeconomic disadvantage is not associated with worse postoperative outcomes. Additional studies regarding the prospective identification of these patients with implementation of strategies to mitigate frailty and malnutrition and assessment of perioperative risk are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"53 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae263","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Frailty, malnutrition and low socioeconomic status may mutually perpetuate each other in a self-reinforcing and interdependent manner. The intertwined nature of these factors may be overlooked when investigating impacts on perioperative outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the impact of frailty, malnutrition and socioeconomic status on perioperative outcomes.

Methods: A multicentre cohort study involving six Australian tertiary hospitals was undertaken. All consecutive surgical patients who underwent an operation were included. Frailty was defined by the Hospital Frailty Risk Score, malnutrition by the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) and low socioeconomic status by the Index of Relative Socioeconomic Disadvantage. Linear mixed-effects and binary logistic generalised estimated equation models were performed for the outcomes: inpatient mortality, length of stay, 30-day readmission and re-operation.

Results: A total of 21 976 patients were included. After controlling for confounders, malnutrition and socioeconomic status, patients at high risk of frailty have a mean hospital length of stay 3.46 times longer (mean ratio = 3.46; 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.20, 3.73; P value < .001), odds of 30-day readmission 2.4 times higher (odds ratio = 2.40; 95% CI: 2.19, 2.63; P value < .001) and odds of in-hospital mortality 12.89 times greater than patients with low risk of frailty (odds ratio = 12.89; 95% CI: 4.51, 36.69; P value < .001). Elevated MUST scores were also significantly associated with worse outcomes, but to a lesser extent. Socioeconomic status had no association with outcomes.

Conclusion: Perioperative risk evaluation should consider both frailty and malnutrition as separate, significant risk factors. Despite strong causal links with frailty and malnutrition, socioeconomic disadvantage is not associated with worse postoperative outcomes. Additional studies regarding the prospective identification of these patients with implementation of strategies to mitigate frailty and malnutrition and assessment of perioperative risk are required.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚弱、营养不良和社会经济地位对围手术期结局的影响。
背景:虚弱、营养不良和低社会经济地位可能以一种自我强化和相互依赖的方式相互延续。在研究围手术期预后的影响时,这些因素的相互交织的性质可能被忽视。本研究旨在探讨虚弱、营养不良和社会经济状况对围手术期结局的影响。方法:对澳大利亚六所三级医院进行多中心队列研究。所有连续接受手术的患者均被纳入。虚弱由医院虚弱风险评分定义,营养不良由营养不良普遍筛查工具(MUST)定义,低社会经济地位由相对社会经济劣势指数定义。对结果进行线性混合效应和二元logistic广义估计方程模型:住院死亡率、住院时间、30天再入院和再手术。结果:共纳入21 976例患者。在控制混杂因素、营养不良和社会经济地位后,脆弱高危患者的平均住院时间延长了3.46倍(平均比率= 3.46;95%置信区间(CI): 3.20, 3.73;结论:围手术期风险评价应同时考虑虚弱和营养不良作为单独的、显著的危险因素。尽管与虚弱和营养不良有很强的因果关系,但社会经济劣势与较差的术后预后无关。需要进一步的研究来前瞻性地识别这些患者,实施减轻虚弱和营养不良的策略,并评估围手术期风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
期刊最新文献
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment On A New Specialist Geriatric Ward In A Post-Acute Rehabilitation Setting: A Retrospective Review Barriers and Facilitators to Hospital Physicians’ Recognition of Prescribing Cascades: A Qualitative Interview Study A Two Year Retrospective Review Of Patients 65-Years And Older Attending Genitourinary Clinic In A Tertiary Centre Impact Of Post-Anaesthesia Care Unit Delays On Older Post-Surgical Patients The Association Of Lifestyle Factors And Medications With Bone Turnover Markers In Older Irish Adults: Results From The TUDA Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1