Ross J Baldessarini, Alessandro Miola, Leonardo Tondo
{"title":"Affective temperaments: Effects on treatment response for major depression.","authors":"Ross J Baldessarini, Alessandro Miola, Leonardo Tondo","doi":"10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is growing interest in assessing affective temperaments in relation to major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder (BD). Needed is evaluation of the impact of temperament ratings on responses to treatment of depression in these disorders. We measured treatment response as %-improvement in HDRS<sub>21</sub> depression ratings and correlated this measure as well as response rate (≥50 % improvement) with TEMPS-A ratings of anxious, cyclothymic, dysthymic, hyperthymic, and irritable affective temperaments in 2264 mood-disorder patients (1165 BD, 1099 MDD; 62.3 % women, mean age 48.5 years). Higher dysthymic temperament score was associated with less improvement in depression ratings, greater hyperthymia scores with increased improvement. Both temperaments also were associated with increases (dysthymia) or decreases (hyperthymia) in initial HDRS<sub>21</sub> scores. However, higher initial HDRS<sub>21</sub> scores led to greater percent-improvement. Multivariable logistic regression sustained independent effects of temperament scores on treatment-response. Reported effects were similar with MDD and BD. Limitations include the observational design limiting causality and uncertain generalizability to other geographical locations or clinical settings. Ratings of dysthymic and hyperthymic temperaments, respectively, were associated with significantly lesser and greater improvement of depression ratings with both MDD and BD.</p>","PeriodicalId":8543,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of psychiatry","volume":"103 ","pages":"104335"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104335","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There is growing interest in assessing affective temperaments in relation to major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder (BD). Needed is evaluation of the impact of temperament ratings on responses to treatment of depression in these disorders. We measured treatment response as %-improvement in HDRS21 depression ratings and correlated this measure as well as response rate (≥50 % improvement) with TEMPS-A ratings of anxious, cyclothymic, dysthymic, hyperthymic, and irritable affective temperaments in 2264 mood-disorder patients (1165 BD, 1099 MDD; 62.3 % women, mean age 48.5 years). Higher dysthymic temperament score was associated with less improvement in depression ratings, greater hyperthymia scores with increased improvement. Both temperaments also were associated with increases (dysthymia) or decreases (hyperthymia) in initial HDRS21 scores. However, higher initial HDRS21 scores led to greater percent-improvement. Multivariable logistic regression sustained independent effects of temperament scores on treatment-response. Reported effects were similar with MDD and BD. Limitations include the observational design limiting causality and uncertain generalizability to other geographical locations or clinical settings. Ratings of dysthymic and hyperthymic temperaments, respectively, were associated with significantly lesser and greater improvement of depression ratings with both MDD and BD.
期刊介绍:
The Asian Journal of Psychiatry serves as a comprehensive resource for psychiatrists, mental health clinicians, neurologists, physicians, mental health students, and policymakers. Its goal is to facilitate the exchange of research findings and clinical practices between Asia and the global community. The journal focuses on psychiatric research relevant to Asia, covering preclinical, clinical, service system, and policy development topics. It also highlights the socio-cultural diversity of the region in relation to mental health.