Oral ketamine for rapid reduction of suicidal ideation in major depressive disorder: A midazolam-controlled randomized clinical trial

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Asian journal of psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-02-23 DOI:10.1016/j.ajp.2025.104413
Asif Seraj , Mohammed Reyazuddin , R.K. Gaur , Chittaranjan Andrade
{"title":"Oral ketamine for rapid reduction of suicidal ideation in major depressive disorder: A midazolam-controlled randomized clinical trial","authors":"Asif Seraj ,&nbsp;Mohammed Reyazuddin ,&nbsp;R.K. Gaur ,&nbsp;Chittaranjan Andrade","doi":"10.1016/j.ajp.2025.104413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The simplest, most convenient, and least expensive way to treat depressed and suicidal patients with ketamine is to administer racemic ketamine by the oral route. We describe the first active-controlled randomized clinical trial of oral racemic ketamine for suicidal ideation associated with depression.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Adult patients with major depressive disorder and expressed suicidal ideation were randomized to receive a single session of oral racemic ketamine (3 mg/kg; n = 40) or oral midazolam (0.3 mg/kg; n = 40). Suicidal ideation was rated using the Modified Scale for Suicidal Ideation (MSSI) and depression, using the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D). Patients were assessed 4 h post-treatment (Day 1) and on Days 3 and 7.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Mean doses were 180 mg and 1.8 mg for ketamine and midazolam, respectively. MSSI scores were significantly lower in the ketamine group at all assessment points: 4 h, Day 3, and Day 7. HAM-D scores were significantly lower in the ketamine group at 4 h and on Day 3. The study-defined HAM-D response and remission rates were 25 % vs 0 % and 5 % vs 0 % in ketamine vs midazolam groups on Day 7. Nausea/vomiting, lightness of body, emotional disturbance (anxiety or crying), and depersonalization/derealization were significantly more frequent in the ketamine group; however, no patient considered these to be of treatment-limiting severity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Oral racemic ketamine is a reasonably well-tolerated and rapidly effective intervention for suicidal ideation and depression in adults with major depressive disorder.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8543,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of psychiatry","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 104413"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876201825000565","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The simplest, most convenient, and least expensive way to treat depressed and suicidal patients with ketamine is to administer racemic ketamine by the oral route. We describe the first active-controlled randomized clinical trial of oral racemic ketamine for suicidal ideation associated with depression.

Methods

Adult patients with major depressive disorder and expressed suicidal ideation were randomized to receive a single session of oral racemic ketamine (3 mg/kg; n = 40) or oral midazolam (0.3 mg/kg; n = 40). Suicidal ideation was rated using the Modified Scale for Suicidal Ideation (MSSI) and depression, using the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D). Patients were assessed 4 h post-treatment (Day 1) and on Days 3 and 7.

Results

Mean doses were 180 mg and 1.8 mg for ketamine and midazolam, respectively. MSSI scores were significantly lower in the ketamine group at all assessment points: 4 h, Day 3, and Day 7. HAM-D scores were significantly lower in the ketamine group at 4 h and on Day 3. The study-defined HAM-D response and remission rates were 25 % vs 0 % and 5 % vs 0 % in ketamine vs midazolam groups on Day 7. Nausea/vomiting, lightness of body, emotional disturbance (anxiety or crying), and depersonalization/derealization were significantly more frequent in the ketamine group; however, no patient considered these to be of treatment-limiting severity.

Conclusions

Oral racemic ketamine is a reasonably well-tolerated and rapidly effective intervention for suicidal ideation and depression in adults with major depressive disorder.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asian journal of psychiatry
Asian journal of psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
297
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Psychiatry serves as a comprehensive resource for psychiatrists, mental health clinicians, neurologists, physicians, mental health students, and policymakers. Its goal is to facilitate the exchange of research findings and clinical practices between Asia and the global community. The journal focuses on psychiatric research relevant to Asia, covering preclinical, clinical, service system, and policy development topics. It also highlights the socio-cultural diversity of the region in relation to mental health.
期刊最新文献
Oral ketamine for rapid reduction of suicidal ideation in major depressive disorder: A midazolam-controlled randomized clinical trial Exploring the role of gut microbiota in depression: Pathogenesis and therapeutic insights Structural neuroimaging abnormality and neurocognitive deficit in the first-degree relatives of schizophrenia patients (FDR) compared to the first-episode patients with schizophrenia (FEP) and healthy controls Exploring the mental health of adolescents in the Philippines The impact of the offline metabolic monitoring tool on psychiatric care: Findings from a cluster RCT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1