Women's experiences and needs in the use of digital technologies for the management of gestational diabetes: An integrative systematic review.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Midwifery Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2024.104262
Qimeng Zhao, Alison Cooke, Gading Aurizki, Dawn Dowding
{"title":"Women's experiences and needs in the use of digital technologies for the management of gestational diabetes: An integrative systematic review.","authors":"Qimeng Zhao, Alison Cooke, Gading Aurizki, Dawn Dowding","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2024.104262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) represents a widespread complication occurring during pregnancy, posing potential risks to both expectant mothers and their babies. Evidence shows that digital technologies provide comparable levels of care to conventional methods for GDM self-management, which help to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes. This systematic review aimed to explore women's experiences in using digital technologies, inform future technology design for gestational diabetes and potentially help improve usability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An integrative systematic review including quantitative, qualitative and mixed-method studies. The search was conducted in five databases including CINAHL, Web of Science, Medline, Embase, and PsycInfo. Studies were eligible when including the experience of using digital technologies for GDM self-management from the women's perspective. The screening processes were conducted by two independent reviewers and reached an overall moderate agreement on inter-rater reliability. Quality appraisal was conducted using the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool version 2018.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty peer-reviewed articles were included, with a predominant or partial focus on five types of digital technologies including mobile applications, virtual care services, webpages, digital devices, and online communities. Women's experiences and needs of using GDM digital technologies were synthesised into five overarching themes: (1) sufficient and straightforward GDM-relevant educational information; (2) advanced personalisation and broader commitments in coaching components; (3) easy data recording and advanced data visualisation in data management; (4) improved healthcare professionals' engagement; (5) development of online community interfaces.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This integrative systematic review gives information on the types of available features across technologies and specific preferences for features by women with GDM. According to the inferred gaps, efforts should be made to facilitate women's self-monitoring using data and feedback, provide personalised information corresponding to women's condition, meet different behaviour change needs using customised coaching features, and enable wider access to information and support.</p>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"141 ","pages":"104262"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2024.104262","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) represents a widespread complication occurring during pregnancy, posing potential risks to both expectant mothers and their babies. Evidence shows that digital technologies provide comparable levels of care to conventional methods for GDM self-management, which help to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes. This systematic review aimed to explore women's experiences in using digital technologies, inform future technology design for gestational diabetes and potentially help improve usability.

Methods: An integrative systematic review including quantitative, qualitative and mixed-method studies. The search was conducted in five databases including CINAHL, Web of Science, Medline, Embase, and PsycInfo. Studies were eligible when including the experience of using digital technologies for GDM self-management from the women's perspective. The screening processes were conducted by two independent reviewers and reached an overall moderate agreement on inter-rater reliability. Quality appraisal was conducted using the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool version 2018.

Results: Thirty peer-reviewed articles were included, with a predominant or partial focus on five types of digital technologies including mobile applications, virtual care services, webpages, digital devices, and online communities. Women's experiences and needs of using GDM digital technologies were synthesised into five overarching themes: (1) sufficient and straightforward GDM-relevant educational information; (2) advanced personalisation and broader commitments in coaching components; (3) easy data recording and advanced data visualisation in data management; (4) improved healthcare professionals' engagement; (5) development of online community interfaces.

Conclusion: This integrative systematic review gives information on the types of available features across technologies and specific preferences for features by women with GDM. According to the inferred gaps, efforts should be made to facilitate women's self-monitoring using data and feedback, provide personalised information corresponding to women's condition, meet different behaviour change needs using customised coaching features, and enable wider access to information and support.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Midwifery
Midwifery 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
221
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Midwifery publishes the latest peer reviewed international research to inform the safety, quality, outcomes and experiences of pregnancy, birth and maternity care for childbearing women, their babies and families. The journal’s publications support midwives and maternity care providers to explore and develop their knowledge, skills and attitudes informed by best available evidence. Midwifery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and discussion of advances in evidence, controversies and current research, and promotes continuing education through publication of systematic and other scholarly reviews and updates. Midwifery articles cover the cultural, clinical, psycho-social, sociological, epidemiological, education, managerial, workforce, organizational and technological areas of practice in preconception, maternal and infant care. The journal welcomes the highest quality scholarly research that employs rigorous methodology. Midwifery is a leading international journal in midwifery and maternal health with a current impact factor of 1.861 (© Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2016) and employs a double-blind peer review process.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "How valuable is an implementation Toolkit for midwives? An exploratory study" [Midwifery 141 (2025) 104241]. Resumption of sexual activity after childbirth and its related factors in Spanish women, a cross-sectional study. Women's experiences and needs in the use of digital technologies for the management of gestational diabetes: An integrative systematic review. Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and its 3-item anxiety subscale, and the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 item for screening of postpartum depression and anxiety in women in Malta. Area-level deprivation as a risk factor for stillbirth in upper-middle and high-income countries: A scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1