Tayler M S Colton, Daniel W Cox, Johanna M Mickelson, David Kealy
{"title":"Reciprocal language style matching: Indicator or facilitator of therapeutic bond.","authors":"Tayler M S Colton, Daniel W Cox, Johanna M Mickelson, David Kealy","doi":"10.1080/10503307.2024.2437644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The tendency to linguistically synchronize is an adaptive and prosocial process observed in verbal and written communication. Research in therapeutic contexts has primarily conceptualized reciprocal language style matching (rLSM; i.e., similarity of function words) as <i>indicating</i> the therapeutic relationship. However, in non-therapeutic contexts, rLSM has been conceptualized as <i>facilitating</i> relationship formation and maintenance. The aim of the present study was to examine if an indication model or facilitation model provided a better explanation for the association between rLSM and the therapeutic bond.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Online text-based crisis-counseling sessions (<i>N</i> = 350) with clients in suicidal crisis were coded for rLSM and therapeutic bond. To examine and compare the indication and facilitation models, we used random intercept cross-lagged panel models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The association between rLSM and therapeutic bond was better explained by the facilitation model (i.e., rLSM predicting bond) than the indication model (i.e., rLSM co-occurring with bond). However, a model that included (a) rLSM predicting therapeutic bond and (b) the cross-sectional association between therapeutic bond and rLSM was the best fit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate that rLSM may play a role in establishing the therapeutic relationship and be reflective of the client-counselor relationship. Implications for counseling practice are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48159,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2024.2437644","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The tendency to linguistically synchronize is an adaptive and prosocial process observed in verbal and written communication. Research in therapeutic contexts has primarily conceptualized reciprocal language style matching (rLSM; i.e., similarity of function words) as indicating the therapeutic relationship. However, in non-therapeutic contexts, rLSM has been conceptualized as facilitating relationship formation and maintenance. The aim of the present study was to examine if an indication model or facilitation model provided a better explanation for the association between rLSM and the therapeutic bond.
Methods: Online text-based crisis-counseling sessions (N = 350) with clients in suicidal crisis were coded for rLSM and therapeutic bond. To examine and compare the indication and facilitation models, we used random intercept cross-lagged panel models.
Results: The association between rLSM and therapeutic bond was better explained by the facilitation model (i.e., rLSM predicting bond) than the indication model (i.e., rLSM co-occurring with bond). However, a model that included (a) rLSM predicting therapeutic bond and (b) the cross-sectional association between therapeutic bond and rLSM was the best fit.
Conclusions: Our findings indicate that rLSM may play a role in establishing the therapeutic relationship and be reflective of the client-counselor relationship. Implications for counseling practice are discussed.
期刊介绍:
Psychotherapy Research seeks to enhance the development, scientific quality, and social relevance of psychotherapy research and to foster the use of research findings in practice, education, and policy formulation. The Journal publishes reports of original research on all aspects of psychotherapy, including its outcomes, its processes, education of practitioners, and delivery of services. It also publishes methodological, theoretical, and review articles of direct relevance to psychotherapy research. The Journal is addressed to an international, interdisciplinary audience and welcomes submissions dealing with diverse theoretical orientations, treatment modalities.