Management of Fecal Incontinence: Surgical Treatment Options.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Visceral Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1159/000541355
Birgit Bittorf, Klaus E Matzel
{"title":"Management of Fecal Incontinence: Surgical Treatment Options.","authors":"Birgit Bittorf, Klaus E Matzel","doi":"10.1159/000541355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fecal incontinence (FI) is a frequent, often underestimated, health issue in adults. Its treatment is primarily nonsurgical. Only if conservative options fail to result in adequate symptom reduction should surgery be considered. We present an overview of historical and current surgical treatment options.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Well-known sphincter replacement techniques such as dynamic graciloplasty and the artificial bowel sphincter are no longer used because of their invasiveness and relevant comorbidity. Today, sphincteroplasty and sacral neuromodulation (SNM) are the most common procedures recommended in current guidelines. The therapeutic choice is based on diagnostic findings. Sphincteroplasty is an option only in patients with an anal sphincter lesion and has only moderate long-term success. SNM has become the established first choice in multiple pathophysiological conditions resulting in FI, as it has proved highly successful with minimal invasiveness. Over time, the spectrum of indications has evolved and the technique is now successful in morphological sphincter defects as well.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>The spectrum of surgical options to treat FI is limited. Owing to its efficacy and low comorbidity, SNM is now considered the gold standard in multiple pathophysiological and morphological conditions, whereas sphincteroplasty remains an option in patients with FI from a defined sphincter lesion.</p>","PeriodicalId":56003,"journal":{"name":"Visceral Medicine","volume":"40 6","pages":"318-324"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11631101/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visceral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541355","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fecal incontinence (FI) is a frequent, often underestimated, health issue in adults. Its treatment is primarily nonsurgical. Only if conservative options fail to result in adequate symptom reduction should surgery be considered. We present an overview of historical and current surgical treatment options.

Summary: Well-known sphincter replacement techniques such as dynamic graciloplasty and the artificial bowel sphincter are no longer used because of their invasiveness and relevant comorbidity. Today, sphincteroplasty and sacral neuromodulation (SNM) are the most common procedures recommended in current guidelines. The therapeutic choice is based on diagnostic findings. Sphincteroplasty is an option only in patients with an anal sphincter lesion and has only moderate long-term success. SNM has become the established first choice in multiple pathophysiological conditions resulting in FI, as it has proved highly successful with minimal invasiveness. Over time, the spectrum of indications has evolved and the technique is now successful in morphological sphincter defects as well.

Key messages: The spectrum of surgical options to treat FI is limited. Owing to its efficacy and low comorbidity, SNM is now considered the gold standard in multiple pathophysiological and morphological conditions, whereas sphincteroplasty remains an option in patients with FI from a defined sphincter lesion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大便失禁的处理:手术治疗方案。
背景:大便失禁(FI)是一种常见的,经常被低估的健康问题。其治疗主要是非手术治疗。只有当保守的选择不能导致足够的症状减轻时,才应该考虑手术。我们提出了历史和当前的手术治疗方案的概述。摘要:众所周知的括约肌替代技术,如动态股髂成形术和人工肠括约肌,由于其侵入性和相关的合并症而不再使用。今天,括约肌成形术和骶骨神经调节(SNM)是目前指南中推荐的最常见的手术。治疗的选择是基于诊断结果。括约肌成形术仅适用于肛门括约肌病变的患者,并且只有中等程度的长期成功。SNM已成为多种病理生理条件下导致FI的首选,因为它已被证明是非常成功的微创手术。随着时间的推移,适应症的范围已经发展,该技术现在在形态学括约肌缺陷方面也取得了成功。关键信息:治疗FI的手术选择范围有限。由于其疗效和低合并症,SNM现在被认为是多种病理生理和形态学条件下的金标准,而括约肌成形术仍然是来自明确括约肌病变的FI患者的一种选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Visceral Medicine
Visceral Medicine Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: This interdisciplinary journal is unique in its field as it covers the principles of both gastrointestinal medicine and surgery required for treating abdominal diseases. In each issue invited reviews provide a comprehensive overview of one selected topic. Thus, a sound background of the state of the art in clinical practice and research is provided. A panel of specialists in gastroenterology, surgery, radiology, and pathology discusses different approaches to diagnosis and treatment of the topic covered in the respective issue. Original articles, case reports, and commentaries make for further interesting reading.
期刊最新文献
Gastrointestinal Motility Function and Dysfunction in the Elderly Patient: What Are the Effects of Aging? Management of Fecal Incontinence: Etiology, Diagnostic Approach, and Conservative Therapy. Management of Fecal Incontinence: Surgical Treatment Options. State-of-the-Art Surgery in Achalasia. Update Motility Disorders: Entering an Age of Discovery?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1