{"title":"Management of Fecal Incontinence: Surgical Treatment Options.","authors":"Birgit Bittorf, Klaus E Matzel","doi":"10.1159/000541355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fecal incontinence (FI) is a frequent, often underestimated, health issue in adults. Its treatment is primarily nonsurgical. Only if conservative options fail to result in adequate symptom reduction should surgery be considered. We present an overview of historical and current surgical treatment options.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Well-known sphincter replacement techniques such as dynamic graciloplasty and the artificial bowel sphincter are no longer used because of their invasiveness and relevant comorbidity. Today, sphincteroplasty and sacral neuromodulation (SNM) are the most common procedures recommended in current guidelines. The therapeutic choice is based on diagnostic findings. Sphincteroplasty is an option only in patients with an anal sphincter lesion and has only moderate long-term success. SNM has become the established first choice in multiple pathophysiological conditions resulting in FI, as it has proved highly successful with minimal invasiveness. Over time, the spectrum of indications has evolved and the technique is now successful in morphological sphincter defects as well.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>The spectrum of surgical options to treat FI is limited. Owing to its efficacy and low comorbidity, SNM is now considered the gold standard in multiple pathophysiological and morphological conditions, whereas sphincteroplasty remains an option in patients with FI from a defined sphincter lesion.</p>","PeriodicalId":56003,"journal":{"name":"Visceral Medicine","volume":"40 6","pages":"318-324"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11631101/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visceral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541355","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Fecal incontinence (FI) is a frequent, often underestimated, health issue in adults. Its treatment is primarily nonsurgical. Only if conservative options fail to result in adequate symptom reduction should surgery be considered. We present an overview of historical and current surgical treatment options.
Summary: Well-known sphincter replacement techniques such as dynamic graciloplasty and the artificial bowel sphincter are no longer used because of their invasiveness and relevant comorbidity. Today, sphincteroplasty and sacral neuromodulation (SNM) are the most common procedures recommended in current guidelines. The therapeutic choice is based on diagnostic findings. Sphincteroplasty is an option only in patients with an anal sphincter lesion and has only moderate long-term success. SNM has become the established first choice in multiple pathophysiological conditions resulting in FI, as it has proved highly successful with minimal invasiveness. Over time, the spectrum of indications has evolved and the technique is now successful in morphological sphincter defects as well.
Key messages: The spectrum of surgical options to treat FI is limited. Owing to its efficacy and low comorbidity, SNM is now considered the gold standard in multiple pathophysiological and morphological conditions, whereas sphincteroplasty remains an option in patients with FI from a defined sphincter lesion.
期刊介绍:
This interdisciplinary journal is unique in its field as it covers the principles of both gastrointestinal medicine and surgery required for treating abdominal diseases. In each issue invited reviews provide a comprehensive overview of one selected topic. Thus, a sound background of the state of the art in clinical practice and research is provided. A panel of specialists in gastroenterology, surgery, radiology, and pathology discusses different approaches to diagnosis and treatment of the topic covered in the respective issue. Original articles, case reports, and commentaries make for further interesting reading.