Assessing the feasibility of handheld scanning technologies in neonatal intensive care: Trueness, acceptability, and suitability for personalised medical devices.
Deanne August, Isabel Byram, David Forrestal, Mathilde Desselle, Nathan Stevenson, Kartik Iyer, Mark W Davies, Katherine White, Linda Cobbald, Lynette Chapple, Kellie McGrory, Margaret McLean, Stephanie Hall, Brittany Schoenmaker, Jackie Clement, Melissa M Lai
{"title":"Assessing the feasibility of handheld scanning technologies in neonatal intensive care: Trueness, acceptability, and suitability for personalised medical devices.","authors":"Deanne August, Isabel Byram, David Forrestal, Mathilde Desselle, Nathan Stevenson, Kartik Iyer, Mark W Davies, Katherine White, Linda Cobbald, Lynette Chapple, Kellie McGrory, Margaret McLean, Stephanie Hall, Brittany Schoenmaker, Jackie Clement, Melissa M Lai","doi":"10.1016/j.aucc.2024.09.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) injuries are common for premature infants. Clinical use of three-dimensional (3D) scanning is established in adult medicine, but the possibilities in neonatal care are still emerging. Custom printed CPAP devices have the potential to reduce injuries and disfigurement in this vulnerable population.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We sought to identify the most feasible portable 3D scanner for use in the neonatal intensive care environment towards the development of custom-fitting CPAP devices for premature infants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four handheld 3D scanners were assessed and compared, Artec Leo, Revopoint POP 2, iPad Pro/Metascan, and iPhone/Scandy Pro. Trained neonatal clinicians (medical and nursing) undertook mock scans in a simulated neonatal intensive care environment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty scans were performed by 13 neonatal clinicians (four medical/nurse practitioners and nine nurses). The median mean absolute error was 0.21 mm (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.19-0.26), 0.17 mm (IQR: 0.15-0.21), and 1.08 mm (IQR: 1.0-1.63) for Artec Leo, Revopoint POP 2, and Scandy Pro, respectively. Scan times were the quickest for Artec Leo at 22.9 sec (IQR: 18.5-27), followed by Revopoint POP 2 at 25.2 sec (IQR: 22-34.4). Artec Leo was rated most expensive, but Revopoint POP 2 was rated more ergonomic. Both app-based 3D scanners (Metascan and Scandy Pro) presented data security issues.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Artec Leo and Revopoint POP 2 were identified as most feasible for use to perform 3D scans on premature infants in the neonatal intensive care environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":51239,"journal":{"name":"Australian Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":"101127"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2024.09.012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) injuries are common for premature infants. Clinical use of three-dimensional (3D) scanning is established in adult medicine, but the possibilities in neonatal care are still emerging. Custom printed CPAP devices have the potential to reduce injuries and disfigurement in this vulnerable population.
Aim: We sought to identify the most feasible portable 3D scanner for use in the neonatal intensive care environment towards the development of custom-fitting CPAP devices for premature infants.
Methods: Four handheld 3D scanners were assessed and compared, Artec Leo, Revopoint POP 2, iPad Pro/Metascan, and iPhone/Scandy Pro. Trained neonatal clinicians (medical and nursing) undertook mock scans in a simulated neonatal intensive care environment.
Results: Sixty scans were performed by 13 neonatal clinicians (four medical/nurse practitioners and nine nurses). The median mean absolute error was 0.21 mm (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.19-0.26), 0.17 mm (IQR: 0.15-0.21), and 1.08 mm (IQR: 1.0-1.63) for Artec Leo, Revopoint POP 2, and Scandy Pro, respectively. Scan times were the quickest for Artec Leo at 22.9 sec (IQR: 18.5-27), followed by Revopoint POP 2 at 25.2 sec (IQR: 22-34.4). Artec Leo was rated most expensive, but Revopoint POP 2 was rated more ergonomic. Both app-based 3D scanners (Metascan and Scandy Pro) presented data security issues.
Conclusions: Artec Leo and Revopoint POP 2 were identified as most feasible for use to perform 3D scans on premature infants in the neonatal intensive care environment.
期刊介绍：
Australian Critical Care is the official journal of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN). It is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal, providing clinically relevant research, reviews and articles of interest to the critical care community. Australian Critical Care publishes peer-reviewed scholarly papers that report research findings, research-based reviews, discussion papers and commentaries which are of interest to an international readership of critical care practitioners, educators, administrators and researchers. Interprofessional articles are welcomed.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
