Evidence to inform biopharmaceutical policy: call for research on the impact of public policies on investment in drug development.

Health affairs scholar Pub Date : 2024-10-10 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxae129
Sandra Barbosu, Kirsten Axelsen, Stephen Ezell
{"title":"Evidence to inform biopharmaceutical policy: call for research on the impact of public policies on investment in drug development.","authors":"Sandra Barbosu, Kirsten Axelsen, Stephen Ezell","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxae129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper highlights the pressing need for updated, robust evidence to inform biopharmaceutical policy, particularly in light of recent initiatives such as the Inflation Reduction Act. Current estimates that inform such policies, including those from the Congressional Budget Office, rely on outdated data and models that fail to fully capture the complexities of modern investment decisions or the broader impact of policies on drug development in areas like oncology, rare diseases, and vaccines. Understanding how expectations of financial returns influence investment in all stages of drug development is critical for evaluating these policies' long-term effects on innovation. This piece reviews the current evidence on the relationship between financial returns and research and development investment and considers how this evidence is being used to shape biopharmaceutical policy. It also highlights gaps in data and methodology, emphasizing the need for better models that reflect real-world trade-offs, investment risks, and therapeutic area-specific impacts. Finally, this paper calls for improved access to federal and private data to better inform evidence-based policymaking and to study policy impact on investments in the next generation of medicines, particularly in emerging fields like gene and cell therapies, where the implications of policy decisions are not yet fully understood.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"2 12","pages":"qxae129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11631377/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper highlights the pressing need for updated, robust evidence to inform biopharmaceutical policy, particularly in light of recent initiatives such as the Inflation Reduction Act. Current estimates that inform such policies, including those from the Congressional Budget Office, rely on outdated data and models that fail to fully capture the complexities of modern investment decisions or the broader impact of policies on drug development in areas like oncology, rare diseases, and vaccines. Understanding how expectations of financial returns influence investment in all stages of drug development is critical for evaluating these policies' long-term effects on innovation. This piece reviews the current evidence on the relationship between financial returns and research and development investment and considers how this evidence is being used to shape biopharmaceutical policy. It also highlights gaps in data and methodology, emphasizing the need for better models that reflect real-world trade-offs, investment risks, and therapeutic area-specific impacts. Finally, this paper calls for improved access to federal and private data to better inform evidence-based policymaking and to study policy impact on investments in the next generation of medicines, particularly in emerging fields like gene and cell therapies, where the implications of policy decisions are not yet fully understood.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为生物制药政策提供信息的证据:呼吁研究公共政策对药物开发投资的影响。
本文强调迫切需要最新的、有力的证据来为生物制药政策提供信息,特别是考虑到最近的举措,如《通货膨胀减少法》。包括国会预算办公室(Congressional Budget Office)在内,目前为此类政策提供信息的估计依赖于过时的数据和模型,无法充分反映现代投资决策的复杂性,也无法充分反映政策对肿瘤、罕见疾病和疫苗等领域药物开发的更广泛影响。了解财务回报预期如何影响药物开发各个阶段的投资,对于评估这些政策对创新的长期影响至关重要。这篇文章回顾了目前关于财务回报与研发投资之间关系的证据,并考虑了如何利用这些证据来制定生物制药政策。它还强调了数据和方法上的差距,强调需要更好的模型来反映现实世界的权衡、投资风险和治疗领域的特定影响。最后,本文呼吁改善对联邦和私人数据的获取,以便更好地为基于证据的政策制定提供信息,并研究政策对下一代药物投资的影响,特别是在基因和细胞疗法等新兴领域,在这些领域,政策决策的影响尚未得到充分理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
La isla mínima
IF 0 Archivos De La Sociedad Espanola De OftalmologiaPub Date : 2016-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.oftal.2015.12.006
A. de Freytas, J. Vila Arteaga
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Medicaid-covered health care visits during the postpartum year: Variation by enrollee characteristics and state. Use of real-world evidence in the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program: A checklist for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and manufacturers. Correction to: What happens behind closed doors? Investigating care practices in nursing home and assisted living memory care units. The fundamental importance of social insurance for health equity. Advancing a political economy approach to health using lessons from US antitrust and climate policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1