Group buying with consumer disappointment at failed deals

Jie Wang, Benedict Jun Ma, Yanyi Yang, Chun-Hung Cheng, Yong-Hong Kuo
{"title":"Group buying with consumer disappointment at failed deals","authors":"Jie Wang, Benedict Jun Ma, Yanyi Yang, Chun-Hung Cheng, Yong-Hong Kuo","doi":"10.1016/j.tre.2024.103903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In group buying (GB), the retailer launches a deal with a discounted product price and a minimum group size requirement. Strategic consumers then determine whether to sign up for the GB deal or purchase the product at the regular price immediately. If GB fails, disappointed GB participants perceive a negative psychological utility and decide whether or not to buy it again at the regular price. Considering the disappointment caused by a GB failure, in our basic model, we formulate a two-period game to study the retailer’s optimal pricing decisions and consumers’ purchasing strategies. By deriving the likelihood function of a consumer signing up for the GB deal and utilizing rational expectations theory, we characterize how consumers form their own beliefs about the GB success rate. We find that consumer sentiment toward a failed GB deal serves an important role in a GB deal. Specifically, there exists a threshold of the disappointment factor where the retailer’s profit and consumers’ purchase decisions may change, and consumer leakage and retention may occur. We prove the existence of the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium and outline how the retailer should design the GB schedule. Our study shows that if properly designed, GB is an effective strategy to enhance consumer interests and improve profit. Moreover, a big discount should be offered when the disappointment factor is significant. When the consumer sentiment toward a failed GB deal is insignificant, the retailer should launch a GB deal; otherwise, he should provide the regular sales channel only. We conduct numerical experiments to study the impacts of different factors in a GB deal. Our key results continue to hold in several extensions from our basic model: retailer competition, observable secured group size, and social interactions between consumers.","PeriodicalId":49418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103903","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In group buying (GB), the retailer launches a deal with a discounted product price and a minimum group size requirement. Strategic consumers then determine whether to sign up for the GB deal or purchase the product at the regular price immediately. If GB fails, disappointed GB participants perceive a negative psychological utility and decide whether or not to buy it again at the regular price. Considering the disappointment caused by a GB failure, in our basic model, we formulate a two-period game to study the retailer’s optimal pricing decisions and consumers’ purchasing strategies. By deriving the likelihood function of a consumer signing up for the GB deal and utilizing rational expectations theory, we characterize how consumers form their own beliefs about the GB success rate. We find that consumer sentiment toward a failed GB deal serves an important role in a GB deal. Specifically, there exists a threshold of the disappointment factor where the retailer’s profit and consumers’ purchase decisions may change, and consumer leakage and retention may occur. We prove the existence of the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium and outline how the retailer should design the GB schedule. Our study shows that if properly designed, GB is an effective strategy to enhance consumer interests and improve profit. Moreover, a big discount should be offered when the disappointment factor is significant. When the consumer sentiment toward a failed GB deal is insignificant, the retailer should launch a GB deal; otherwise, he should provide the regular sales channel only. We conduct numerical experiments to study the impacts of different factors in a GB deal. Our key results continue to hold in several extensions from our basic model: retailer competition, observable secured group size, and social interactions between consumers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
团购与消费者对失败交易的失望
在团购(GB)中,零售商以折扣产品价格和最低团体规模要求发起交易。然后,有战略眼光的消费者决定是签署国标协议,还是立即以正常价格购买产品。如果GB失败,失望的GB参与者感知到负的心理效用,并决定是否以正常价格再次购买。在我们的基本模型中,考虑到由于GB失败而导致的失望,我们制定了一个两期博弈来研究零售商的最优定价决策和消费者的购买策略。通过推导消费者签约GB交易的可能性函数并利用理性预期理论,我们描述了消费者如何形成自己对GB成功率的信念。我们发现,消费者对失败的GB交易的情绪在GB交易中起着重要作用。具体而言,零售商的利润和消费者的购买决策可能会发生变化,消费者流失和保留可能会出现,存在一个失望因素的阈值。证明了子博弈完美纳什均衡的存在性,并概述了零售商如何设计GB计划。我们的研究表明,如果设计得当,GB是提高消费者利益和提高利润的有效策略。此外,当失望因素很大时,应该提供较大的折扣。当消费者对失败的GB交易的情绪微不足道时,零售商应该推出GB交易;否则,他应该只提供常规的销售渠道。我们通过数值实验研究了不同因素对国库券交易的影响。我们的主要结果继续适用于我们的基本模型的几个扩展:零售商竞争、可观察的安全群体规模和消费者之间的社会互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
16.00%
发文量
285
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review is a reputable journal that publishes high-quality articles covering a wide range of topics in the field of logistics and transportation research. The journal welcomes submissions on various subjects, including transport economics, transport infrastructure and investment appraisal, evaluation of public policies related to transportation, empirical and analytical studies of logistics management practices and performance, logistics and operations models, and logistics and supply chain management. Part E aims to provide informative and well-researched articles that contribute to the understanding and advancement of the field. The content of the journal is complementary to other prestigious journals in transportation research, such as Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies, Part D: Transport and Environment, and Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Together, these journals form a comprehensive and cohesive reference for current research in transportation science.
期刊最新文献
Designing hub-based regional transportation networks with service level constraints Enhancing carsharing pricing and operations through integrated choice models PTB: A deep reinforcement learning method for flexible logistics service combination problem with spatial-temporal constraint Should live streaming be adopted for agricultural supply chain considering platform’s quality improvement and blockchain support? Returns management in a supply chain considering freight insurance and consumer disappointment aversion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1