Lookahead scenario relaxation for dynamic time window assignment in service routing

IF 5.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transportation Research Part B-Methodological Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1016/j.trb.2024.103137
Rosario Paradiso, Roberto Roberti, Marlin Ulmer
{"title":"Lookahead scenario relaxation for dynamic time window assignment in service routing","authors":"Rosario Paradiso, Roberto Roberti, Marlin Ulmer","doi":"10.1016/j.trb.2024.103137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider a problem where customers dynamically request next-day home service, e.g., repair or installments. Unlike attended home delivery, customers cannot select a time window (TW), the service provider assigns a next-day TW to each new customer if the customer can feasibly be inserted in the service route of the next day without violating the TWs of the existing customers. Otherwise, customer service will be postponed to another day (which is outside the scope of this work). The provider aims to serve many customers the next day for fast service and efficient operations. Thus, TWs have to be assigned to keep the flexibility of the fleet for future requests. For such anticipatory assignments, we propose a stochastic lookahead method that samples a set of future request scenarios, solves the corresponding team-orienteering problems with TWs, and uses the solutions to evaluate current TW assignment decisions. For real-time solutions to the team orienteering problem, we propose to approximate its optimal solution value with an upper bound. The bound is obtained by solving the linear relaxation of a set packing reformulation via column generation. We test our algorithm on Iowa City data and compare it to several benchmark policies. The results show that our method significantly increases customer service, and our relaxation is essential for effective decisions. We further show that our policy does not lead to observable discrimination against inconveniently located customers.","PeriodicalId":54418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part B-Methodological","volume":"86 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part B-Methodological","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2024.103137","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We consider a problem where customers dynamically request next-day home service, e.g., repair or installments. Unlike attended home delivery, customers cannot select a time window (TW), the service provider assigns a next-day TW to each new customer if the customer can feasibly be inserted in the service route of the next day without violating the TWs of the existing customers. Otherwise, customer service will be postponed to another day (which is outside the scope of this work). The provider aims to serve many customers the next day for fast service and efficient operations. Thus, TWs have to be assigned to keep the flexibility of the fleet for future requests. For such anticipatory assignments, we propose a stochastic lookahead method that samples a set of future request scenarios, solves the corresponding team-orienteering problems with TWs, and uses the solutions to evaluate current TW assignment decisions. For real-time solutions to the team orienteering problem, we propose to approximate its optimal solution value with an upper bound. The bound is obtained by solving the linear relaxation of a set packing reformulation via column generation. We test our algorithm on Iowa City data and compare it to several benchmark policies. The results show that our method significantly increases customer service, and our relaxation is essential for effective decisions. We further show that our policy does not lead to observable discrimination against inconveniently located customers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
服务路由中动态时间窗分配的前瞻性场景放松
我们考虑这样一个问题:顾客动态地要求次日上门服务,例如修理或分期付款。与上门送货不同,客户不能选择一个时间窗口(TW),如果客户可以在不违反现有客户TWs的情况下插入到第二天的服务路线中,服务提供商会给每个新客户分配一个第二天的TW。否则,客户服务将推迟到另一天(这超出了本工作的范围)。供应商的目标是第二天为许多客户提供快速的服务和高效的操作。因此,必须分配TWs,以保持机队的灵活性,以应对未来的需求。对于这种预期分配,我们提出了一种随机前瞻方法,该方法对一组未来的请求场景进行采样,解决与TWs相关的团队定向问题,并使用这些解决方案来评估当前的TW分配决策。对于团队定向问题的实时解,我们提出用上界逼近其最优解值。通过柱生成求解集填料重构公式的线性松弛得到了边界。我们在爱荷华市的数据上测试了我们的算法,并将其与几个基准政策进行了比较。结果表明,我们的方法显著提高了客户服务,我们的放松是有效决策的必要条件。我们进一步表明,我们的政策不会导致对位置不方便的客户的明显歧视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Research Part B-Methodological
Transportation Research Part B-Methodological 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
8.80%
发文量
143
审稿时长
14.1 weeks
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part B publishes papers on all methodological aspects of the subject, particularly those that require mathematical analysis. The general theme of the journal is the development and solution of problems that are adequately motivated to deal with important aspects of the design and/or analysis of transportation systems. Areas covered include: traffic flow; design and analysis of transportation networks; control and scheduling; optimization; queuing theory; logistics; supply chains; development and application of statistical, econometric and mathematical models to address transportation problems; cost models; pricing and/or investment; traveler or shipper behavior; cost-benefit methodologies.
期刊最新文献
Modeling the residual queue and queue-dependent capacity in a static traffic assignment problem Estimating gap acceptance parameters with a Bayesian approach What do walking and e-hailing bring to scale economies in on-demand mobility? Optimizing carbon emissions in green logistics for time-dependent routing Equilibrium horizontal queues and a paradox of tolling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1