{"title":"Cloth versus disposable diapers: an exploratory study on family habits","authors":"Marjorie Uber, Renata R. Imoto, Vânia O. Carvalho","doi":"10.1016/j.jped.2024.10.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To describe features and habits of diaper area care and compare the frequency of diaper dermatitis in infants using cloth diapers with those using disposable diapers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Questionnaires were administered to families with infants who had not started potty training, to assess the frequency of diaper rash in two groups: babies who use exclusively cloth diapers (CD), and others with exclusively disposable diapers (DD). The hygiene methods of the perineal region and the skin lesions frequency were evaluated. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>1389 participants were included, 53 % male, with a median age of 16 (7–24) months, 1269 (91.4 %) in DD and 120 (8.6 %) in CD. Mild diaper rash occurred a few times a year in 47.0 % and 47.5 % in the DD and CD groups, respectively (<em>p</em> = 0.47). Severe diaper rash occurred a few times a year in 13 % and 10.7 % in the DD and CD groups, respectively (<em>p</em> = 0.66). In the DD, the most used hygiene method was wet wipes (61.5 %), whereas in the CD it was cotton/cloth with water (62.2 %; <em>p</em> < 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Disposable diapers continue to be more used; hygiene habits differ between the groups and the use of cloth diapers did not increase the frequency of diaper dermatitis when compared to the use of disposable diapers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14867,"journal":{"name":"Jornal de pediatria","volume":"101 2","pages":"Pages 276-281"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal de pediatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021755724001463","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To describe features and habits of diaper area care and compare the frequency of diaper dermatitis in infants using cloth diapers with those using disposable diapers.
Methods
Questionnaires were administered to families with infants who had not started potty training, to assess the frequency of diaper rash in two groups: babies who use exclusively cloth diapers (CD), and others with exclusively disposable diapers (DD). The hygiene methods of the perineal region and the skin lesions frequency were evaluated. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee.
Results
1389 participants were included, 53 % male, with a median age of 16 (7–24) months, 1269 (91.4 %) in DD and 120 (8.6 %) in CD. Mild diaper rash occurred a few times a year in 47.0 % and 47.5 % in the DD and CD groups, respectively (p = 0.47). Severe diaper rash occurred a few times a year in 13 % and 10.7 % in the DD and CD groups, respectively (p = 0.66). In the DD, the most used hygiene method was wet wipes (61.5 %), whereas in the CD it was cotton/cloth with water (62.2 %; p < 0.001).
Conclusion
Disposable diapers continue to be more used; hygiene habits differ between the groups and the use of cloth diapers did not increase the frequency of diaper dermatitis when compared to the use of disposable diapers.
期刊介绍:
Jornal de Pediatria is a bimonthly publication of the Brazilian Society of Pediatrics (Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria, SBP). It has been published without interruption since 1934. Jornal de Pediatria publishes original articles and review articles covering various areas in the field of pediatrics. By publishing relevant scientific contributions, Jornal de Pediatria aims at improving the standards of pediatrics and of the healthcare provided for children and adolescents in general, as well to foster debate about health.