Obesogenic vs. fatphobic: an examination of environment in relation to fatness.

IF 1 3区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences Pub Date : 2024-12-13 DOI:10.1007/s40656-024-00637-3
Tiana Dodson
{"title":"Obesogenic vs. fatphobic: an examination of environment in relation to fatness.","authors":"Tiana Dodson","doi":"10.1007/s40656-024-00637-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The eradication of fatness (referred to as \"obesity\") is a longtime project of the medical establishment under the guise of health promotion. However, in spite of the large budgets, amount of studies done, and number of interventions tried over the years, the weights of the population still seem to be trending upward. Recent studies and research have been looking into frameworks aimed at combating fatness by reshaping the \"obesogenic\" environment as an approach that takes into account the social and physical environment and its part in promoting fatness. On its face, this research direction looks as if the discourse is changing from seating the fault of fatness at the feet of the individual and placing it more into the social systems and factors surrounding them. In this paper, I will challenge the continued conversation around \"solving\" fatness by looking at the role of the environment as a causal factor and will instead highlight the need to focus more on the impacts of a fatphobic environment on the wellness of fat people.</p>","PeriodicalId":56308,"journal":{"name":"History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences","volume":"46 4","pages":"48"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-024-00637-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The eradication of fatness (referred to as "obesity") is a longtime project of the medical establishment under the guise of health promotion. However, in spite of the large budgets, amount of studies done, and number of interventions tried over the years, the weights of the population still seem to be trending upward. Recent studies and research have been looking into frameworks aimed at combating fatness by reshaping the "obesogenic" environment as an approach that takes into account the social and physical environment and its part in promoting fatness. On its face, this research direction looks as if the discourse is changing from seating the fault of fatness at the feet of the individual and placing it more into the social systems and factors surrounding them. In this paper, I will challenge the continued conversation around "solving" fatness by looking at the role of the environment as a causal factor and will instead highlight the need to focus more on the impacts of a fatphobic environment on the wellness of fat people.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
致肥与恐肥:环境与肥胖关系的研究。
消除肥胖(称为“肥胖”)是医疗机构在促进健康幌子下的一项长期项目。然而,尽管有大量的预算,做了大量的研究,多年来尝试了许多干预措施,人口的体重似乎仍然呈上升趋势。最近的研究一直在寻找旨在通过重塑“致肥”环境来对抗肥胖的框架,作为一种考虑到社会和物理环境及其在促进肥胖中的作用的方法。从表面上看,这个研究方向看起来好像话语正在从把肥胖的错误归咎于个人的脚下,更多地把它放在社会制度和周围的因素上。在本文中,我将挑战围绕“解决”肥胖的持续对话,通过将环境视为一个因果因素的角色,并将强调需要更多地关注肥胖恐惧症环境对肥胖者健康的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 综合性期刊-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences is an interdisciplinary journal committed to providing an integrative approach to understanding the life sciences. It welcomes submissions from historians, philosophers, biologists, physicians, ethicists and scholars in the social studies of science. Contributors are expected to offer broad and interdisciplinary perspectives on the development of biology, biomedicine and related fields, especially as these perspectives illuminate the foundations, development, and/or implications of scientific practices and related developments. Submissions which are collaborative and feature different disciplinary approaches are especially encouraged, as are submissions written by senior and junior scholars (including graduate students).
期刊最新文献
Sorting out and navigating uncertainty in precision medicine. Overcoming medical scholasticism in New Spain: experience and indigenous knowledge in Arias de Benavides' treatment of syphilis. Rewilding: history, intervention and the quest for immanence. The Kantian background of Uexküll's notions of time and space. The experimental psychology behind coordination.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1