Association of prolonged emergency department length of stay and venous thrombo-embolism prophylaxis and outcomes in trauma: A nation-wide secondary analysis.

Wang Pong Chan, Allan E Stolarski, Sophia M Smith, Dane R Scantling, Sheina Theodore, Yorghos Tripodis, Noelle N Saillant, Crisanto M Torres
{"title":"Association of prolonged emergency department length of stay and venous thrombo-embolism prophylaxis and outcomes in trauma: A nation-wide secondary analysis.","authors":"Wang Pong Chan, Allan E Stolarski, Sophia M Smith, Dane R Scantling, Sheina Theodore, Yorghos Tripodis, Noelle N Saillant, Crisanto M Torres","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.112079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The impact of prolonged emergency department length of stay (EDLOS) on appropriately timed pharmacological venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (VTEp) and VTE outcomes is unknown in trauma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of adult patients admitted to civilian trauma centers participating in the American College of Surgeons' TQIP (2019-2021). Patients with severe solid organ, head, or spine injury, early hemorrhage control intervention, pre-existing home anticoagulation or bleeding disorder, inter-facility transfer or early discharge, and injury severity score ≤9 were excluded. Primary exposure was prolonged EDLOS ≥12 h from ED arrival to physical transfer to the wards. Primary outcome was time to first pharmacological VTEp, censored at 24 and 48 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 191,031 patients were included, 3,827 remained in the ED ≥12 h. The median time to VTEp was 25 h (IQR 12-43). Prolonged EDLOS was associated with a 34 % and 21 % decrease in timely administration of VTEp at 24 (aHR 0.66, 95 % CI 0.61-0.72, P < 0.001) and 48 h (aHR 0.79, 95 % CI 0.74-0.84, P < 0.001), respectively. After propensity score matching, associations persisted at 24 (aHR 0.69, 95 % CI 0.61-0.77, P < 0.001) and 48 h (aHR 0.80, 95 % CI 0.74-0.86, P < 0.001). Absent VTEp by 24 h was associated with increased VTE odds (aOR 1.84, 95 % CI 1.62-2.08, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prolonged EDLOS delayed pharmacological VTEp in a nation-wide cohort of trauma patients. Absent VTEp, consequently, increased risk of in-hospital VTE, although future study is needed to validate these findings. Timely transfer of stable trauma patients to the floor may improve outcomes by facilitating appropriately timed VTEp administration and decreasing ED overcrowding.</p>","PeriodicalId":94042,"journal":{"name":"Injury","volume":" ","pages":"112079"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2024.112079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The impact of prolonged emergency department length of stay (EDLOS) on appropriately timed pharmacological venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (VTEp) and VTE outcomes is unknown in trauma.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study of adult patients admitted to civilian trauma centers participating in the American College of Surgeons' TQIP (2019-2021). Patients with severe solid organ, head, or spine injury, early hemorrhage control intervention, pre-existing home anticoagulation or bleeding disorder, inter-facility transfer or early discharge, and injury severity score ≤9 were excluded. Primary exposure was prolonged EDLOS ≥12 h from ED arrival to physical transfer to the wards. Primary outcome was time to first pharmacological VTEp, censored at 24 and 48 h.

Results: A total of 191,031 patients were included, 3,827 remained in the ED ≥12 h. The median time to VTEp was 25 h (IQR 12-43). Prolonged EDLOS was associated with a 34 % and 21 % decrease in timely administration of VTEp at 24 (aHR 0.66, 95 % CI 0.61-0.72, P < 0.001) and 48 h (aHR 0.79, 95 % CI 0.74-0.84, P < 0.001), respectively. After propensity score matching, associations persisted at 24 (aHR 0.69, 95 % CI 0.61-0.77, P < 0.001) and 48 h (aHR 0.80, 95 % CI 0.74-0.86, P < 0.001). Absent VTEp by 24 h was associated with increased VTE odds (aOR 1.84, 95 % CI 1.62-2.08, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Prolonged EDLOS delayed pharmacological VTEp in a nation-wide cohort of trauma patients. Absent VTEp, consequently, increased risk of in-hospital VTE, although future study is needed to validate these findings. Timely transfer of stable trauma patients to the floor may improve outcomes by facilitating appropriately timed VTEp administration and decreasing ED overcrowding.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊住院时间延长与静脉血栓栓塞预防和创伤预后的关系:一项全国性的二级分析。
在创伤患者中,急诊住院时间延长(EDLOS)对适当时间的药理学静脉血栓栓塞预防(VTEp)和VTE结局的影响尚不清楚。方法:对参与美国外科医师学会TQIP(2019-2021)的民用创伤中心收治的成年患者进行回顾性队列研究。排除严重实体器官、头部或脊柱损伤、早期出血控制干预、已有家庭抗凝或出血障碍、机构间转院或提前出院、损伤严重程度评分≤9的患者。主要暴露为从急诊科到达到物理转移到病房的EDLOS延长≥12小时。结果:共纳入191,031例患者,其中3827例患者处于≥12小时的ED状态,达到VTEp的中位时间为25小时(IQR 12-43)。延长的EDLOS分别与24小时(aHR 0.66, 95% CI 0.61-0.72, P < 0.001)和48小时(aHR 0.79, 95% CI 0.74-0.84, P < 0.001)及时给药VTEp降低34%和21%相关。倾向评分匹配后,相关性持续在24小时(aHR 0.69, 95% CI 0.61-0.77, P < 0.001)和48小时(aHR 0.80, 95% CI 0.74-0.86, P < 0.001)。VTEp缺失24 h与VTE几率增加相关(aOR 1.84, 95% CI 1.62 ~ 2.08, P < 0.001)。结论:在全国范围的创伤患者队列中,延长的EDLOS延迟了药理学VTEp。因此,没有VTEp会增加院内VTE的风险,尽管需要进一步的研究来验证这些发现。及时将稳定的创伤患者转移到地板可以通过促进适当的VTEp给药和减少ED过度拥挤来改善结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An analysis of transfers into designated trauma centers from referring institutions - the potential for virtual consultation to reduce transfers. Criteria to clear polytrauma patients with traumatic brain injury for safe definitive surgery (<24 h). Frailty index predicts adverse short- and long-term outcomes in older adults with rib fractures. Factors associated with anxiety and depression one year after trauma critical care admission: A multi-centre study. Retrospective validation of the STUMBL score in a Level 1 trauma centre.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1