An analysis of transfers into designated trauma centers from referring institutions - the potential for virtual consultation to reduce transfers.

Larissa Garza, Michael D April, Julie A Rizzo, Brian J Kirkwood, Andrew D Fisher, Steven G Schauer
{"title":"An analysis of transfers into designated trauma centers from referring institutions - the potential for virtual consultation to reduce transfers.","authors":"Larissa Garza, Michael D April, Julie A Rizzo, Brian J Kirkwood, Andrew D Fisher, Steven G Schauer","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Trauma care frequently happens in emergency departments (ED) outside of major trauma centers. Many injuries often exceed the specialty capabilities of referring hospitals, requiring transfer to larger trauma centers. However, the proportion of patients discharged home without admission from receiving facilities remains unclear, suggesting potential overutilization of transfers. We sought to determine the proportion of transfer patients that are discharged home from the receiving ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied patients ≥15 years captured in the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database who were transferred from a referring institution and were subsequently discharged home from the receiving ED without additional services planned.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2020 to 2022, there were 744,623 patients ≥15 years of age, of which, 82,316 (11 %) were discharged home with (1 %) or without (99 %) additional services planned. The median age was 40 (26-60), and 70 % were male. The most common mechanism of injury was a collision (40 %), followed by falls (30 %). The median composite injury severity score was 5 (1-5). Serious injury by body region was most frequent for the craniomaxillofacial (11 %) followed by the thorax (5 %). Most of the transfers were to level 1 centers (85 %). The most frequently performed procedures were CT brain followed by a CT cervical spine, abdominal ultrasound, MRI cervical spine, hand laceration repair, ocular evaluation, scalp repair, forearm fracture reduction, assessment of ocular pressure, and MRI of the lumbar spine. The most frequent diagnoses were nasal fracture, orbital floor fracture, macular fracture, subdural hematoma, dental fracture, pneumothorax, rib fracture, hand laceration, burns, and vertebral fracture.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found that approximately 1 in 9 patients transferred to a higher level of care are discharged home from the ED, with most requiring neurosurgical, ophthalmologic, dental and craniomaxillofacial services. These findings suggest that virtual communication technology could reduce unnecessary transfers and associated costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":94042,"journal":{"name":"Injury","volume":" ","pages":"112202"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2025.112202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Trauma care frequently happens in emergency departments (ED) outside of major trauma centers. Many injuries often exceed the specialty capabilities of referring hospitals, requiring transfer to larger trauma centers. However, the proportion of patients discharged home without admission from receiving facilities remains unclear, suggesting potential overutilization of transfers. We sought to determine the proportion of transfer patients that are discharged home from the receiving ED.

Methods: We studied patients ≥15 years captured in the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database who were transferred from a referring institution and were subsequently discharged home from the receiving ED without additional services planned.

Results: From 2020 to 2022, there were 744,623 patients ≥15 years of age, of which, 82,316 (11 %) were discharged home with (1 %) or without (99 %) additional services planned. The median age was 40 (26-60), and 70 % were male. The most common mechanism of injury was a collision (40 %), followed by falls (30 %). The median composite injury severity score was 5 (1-5). Serious injury by body region was most frequent for the craniomaxillofacial (11 %) followed by the thorax (5 %). Most of the transfers were to level 1 centers (85 %). The most frequently performed procedures were CT brain followed by a CT cervical spine, abdominal ultrasound, MRI cervical spine, hand laceration repair, ocular evaluation, scalp repair, forearm fracture reduction, assessment of ocular pressure, and MRI of the lumbar spine. The most frequent diagnoses were nasal fracture, orbital floor fracture, macular fracture, subdural hematoma, dental fracture, pneumothorax, rib fracture, hand laceration, burns, and vertebral fracture.

Conclusions: We found that approximately 1 in 9 patients transferred to a higher level of care are discharged home from the ED, with most requiring neurosurgical, ophthalmologic, dental and craniomaxillofacial services. These findings suggest that virtual communication technology could reduce unnecessary transfers and associated costs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An analysis of transfers into designated trauma centers from referring institutions - the potential for virtual consultation to reduce transfers. Criteria to clear polytrauma patients with traumatic brain injury for safe definitive surgery (<24 h). Frailty index predicts adverse short- and long-term outcomes in older adults with rib fractures. Factors associated with anxiety and depression one year after trauma critical care admission: A multi-centre study. Retrospective validation of the STUMBL score in a Level 1 trauma centre.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1