Injury最新文献

Introduction: The elderly population is growing worldwide and is more likely to die from injuries that younger patients would likely survive. Furthermore, elderly trauma patients are often subjected to triage decisions that admit them to lower-level facilities. These patients may require interhospital transfer to a major trauma center for definitive care. The aim of this study was to investigate the time interval from arrival at the primary hospital to arrival at the trauma center among elderly trauma patients (≥65 years) as compared to younger, adult patients (18-64 years). We hypothesized that elderly trauma patients would endure a longer time interval.

Methods: This was a retrospective quality assurance study based on patient data in our trauma registry at the Trauma Center of Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet in Denmark. Data were extracted in the period between 2018 and 2023. We included all adult trauma patients (≥18 years) who underwent interhospital transfer to the trauma center. The primary outcome was minutes from arrival at the primary hospital to arrival at the trauma center. A quality standard of at least 90 % of patients arriving at the trauma center in <240 min after arrival at the primary hospital, was chosen.

Results: In total, 565 patients were included and divided into an elderly cohort (n = 184) and a younger cohort (n = 381). The elderly cohort had a significantly longer median delay (247 vs. 197 min; estimated difference 50 min, 95 % confidence interval (CI) [28, 71]; p < 0.001). The elderly cohort met the quality standard less than the younger cohort (49 % vs. 68 %). The elderly cohort had a significantly higher injury severity score (17 [IQR 13, 25] vs. 16 [IQR 9, 21]; p < 0.001), and we found a significant difference in 30-day mortality, which was supported by an adjusted odds ratio of 6.35 (95 % CI [2.84, 15.7]; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: In conclusion, elderly trauma patients experienced significantly longer median delays from arrival at the primary hospital to arrival at the trauma center compared to younger adult trauma patients. The elderly trauma patients met the quality standard for transfer time at a lower rate than the younger group.

Centralising complex surgeries in specialised UK hospitals improves patient outcomes by leveraging high-volume expertise and optimising resources. Supraclavicular brachial plexus exploration, a complex and high-risk procedure, requires centralisation to enhance care standards. This approach ensures experienced teams, advanced diagnostics, and a multidisciplinary framework for preoperative, surgical, and postoperative care. Early intervention is crucial for optimal results. Centralised centres also support comprehensive rehabilitation and systematic research, promoting evidence-based practices and specialist collaboration. By adopting this approach, the UK healthcare system can ensure that patients with brachial plexus injuries receive the highest quality of care, paving the way for better health outcomes and innovations in surgical practice.

Background: The occurrence and sequelae of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in major trauma patients is underexplored across both trauma and cardiology specialties. Coronary reperfusion greatly reduces the risk of significant morbidity and mortality in AMI. However, in patients presenting with significant injuries, concurrent AMI presents a competing management priority given the increase in risk of bleeding with standard anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy, which may be contraindicated. This study aimed to evaluate the epidemiology and clinical outcomes associated with AMI in a contemporary major trauma cohort.

Methods: This study used data from the Victorian State Trauma Registry (VSTR). All adult patients with major trauma from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2022 were included. Patients that died prior to hospital arrival were excluded. AMI was identified by ICD-10-AM diagnosis codes recorded against the first hospital admission. Clinical outcomes included in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and discharge destination.

Results: 28,928 patients were identified over the 10-year study period. AMI occurred in 401 patients (1.4 %). AMI patients were older, had more comorbidities and were more frequently on anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy. Low impact fall was the most common trauma mechanism in AMI patients. Patients with AMI experienced longer hospital stays (12 [7-20] versus 7 [4-12] days, p < 0.001) and higher rates of in-hospital mortality (adjusted RR 1.45, 95 % CI 1.25-1.65).

Conclusion: AMI in the setting of major trauma occurs in an older, more comorbid, and vulnerable group of patients. AMI is associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality and prolonged hospital stay in the setting of major trauma, underscoring the importance of identifying and treating major trauma associated AMI in a timely and effective manner.

Background: Efficient resuscitation after trauma and shorter time to definitive hemorrhage control help improve trauma outcomes. We aimed to improve the speed and efficiency of resuscitation for critically ill trauma patients in the emergency department by involving interventional radiology and a second surgeon.

Study design: In 2017 our community, non-academic level II trauma center implemented the Double 90 rule-for trauma patients with 2 confirmed systolic blood pressures <90 mm Hg-which involves a second activation including the interventional radiology team, backup trauma surgeon, and operating room charge nurse. We retrospectively reviewed our trauma registry to compare data for high-level trauma patients before (2016, "Pre-Dbl90") and 3 consecutive years after intervention (2018-2020, "Dbl90").

Results: Among 613 patients who met criteria for our highest level of trauma activation, 100 either had activation of the Double 90 rule (Dbl90 patients, n = 76) or met Double 90 rule criteria (Pre-Dbl90 patients, n = 24). The groups were similar in age, sex, injury severity score, penetrating trauma incidence, and admission vitals. Median time to computed tomography decreased throughout the study period, from 34 min in 2016 to 18 min in 2020 (P < .001). Median time to first hemorrhage control procedure decreased from 118 min (2016) to 43 min (2020), (P = .013). Mean packed red blood cell transfusion decreased from 9.1 to 4.8 units (P = .016). Mortality rates were similar between groups.

Conclusion: The Double 90 rule is effective for expediting trauma care starting in the emergency department, shortening the times to computed tomography, hemorrhage control intervention, and decreasing packed red blood cell transfusion.

The majority of patients hospitalised for trauma survive their injuries, with the quality of the survival potentially influenced by early acute hospital rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to review the outcomes of patients managed under an intensive Allied Health Model of Care (AHMOC) compared to a baseline cohort.

Methods: The AHMOC was commenced in February 2020 on the Trauma ward at Alfred Health for 12 months. The baseline group included patients admitted to the trauma ward in 2019. All patients who were registered by either the Victorian Orthopaedic Trauma Outcomes Registry (VOTOR) or the Victorian State Trauma Registry (VSTR). The association between the groups (AHMOC and baseline) and outcomes were assessed using logistic (discharge destination, 12-month return to work) and linear (length of stay (LOS)) regression.

Results: There were 1644 in the baseline group and 1732 in the AHMOC group, of which 70 % and 76 % respectively were discharged directly home from the acute hospital (p value < 0.001). The trauma ward LOS was 4.0 days for each group (p value 0.77). After accounting for confounders, the adjusted odds of discharge home and RTW at 12 months were 53 % (AOR 1.53 95 % CI 1.29, 1.82) and 65 % (AOR 1.65 95% CI 1.24, 2.21) higher for the AHMOC group compared to baseline, respectively. There was also a 6 % reduction in the LOS in the AHMOC group compared to baseline (Adjusted mean difference 6 %; 95 % CI (0.881, 0.999) p value = 0.050).

Conclusion: This study shows an association between an AHMOC for trauma patients with a focus on early and intensive therapy and improved odds of discharge directly home, as well as improved 12 month return to work outcomes.

Background: Survivors of a major trauma experience a range of difficulties in relation to the reduction in physical, psychosocial, and cognitive functions, which can result in a reduced health-related quality of life. This study aims to explore lived experiences of major trauma survivors in the German healthcare system.

Methods: Semi-structured exploratory interviews were performed with nine major trauma survivors (18-55 years; Injury Severity Score ≥16). For exploratory analyses, an artificial intelligence-based coding software was used. Further, results were clustered by using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework (ICF).

Results: Communication was one of the major topics concerning amongst others diverting opinions between different healthcare disciplines and a general lack of information. The participants showed a high demand for a contact person. Furthermore, social support was essential during recovery for those interviewed. Social network was not only important as emotional and physical support but also for overcoming of gaps in the healthcare system. The support by employers and colleagues seemed to be beneficial for our participants in relation to returning to work. Further, psychological consequences of trauma, and that mobility is a key factor for quality of life, self-efficacy and return to work were discussed.

Discussion: The qualitative analyses highlight several topics such as communication, burden of sickness, support systems that the participants mentioned as important along their journey through the German healthcare system during recovery. Through the ICF model the interplay of certain components that influenced the outcome of the major trauma survivors was visualized.

Implications: These results might offer a deepened understanding of modifiable components of a patient pathway in recovery process such as improvements of patient communication, provision of a contact person and others.