Exploring mobility of care with measures of accessibility

IF 5.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of Transport Geography Pub Date : 2024-12-13 DOI:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.104050
Anastasia Soukhov, Nicholas Mooney, Léa Ravensbergen
{"title":"Exploring mobility of care with measures of accessibility","authors":"Anastasia Soukhov, Nicholas Mooney, Léa Ravensbergen","doi":"10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.104050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accessibility, the ease of interacting with potential opportunities, is an increasingly important tool among transport planners aiming to foster equitable and sustainable cities. However, in accessibility research there is a historical focus on employment destinations that is shaped by a masculinist transportation planning tradition. This paper aims to counter this gendered bias by connecting the Mobility of Care framework, a gender-aware transport planning conceptualisation to an empirical accessibility analysis of care destinations in the City of Hamilton, Canada. Care destinations are all the places one must visit to sustain household needs such shopping, errands, and caring for others. This paper considers access to care across different modes of transport at two travel time thresholds (trips shorter than 15-min and 30-min) using a curated care destination dataset. The accessibility methods used includes the cumulative opportunities measure and a competitive and singly-constrained accessibility measure (spatial availability) for different modes. Overall, results indicate that accessibility by car is exceptionally high across the city, while access by public transit, cycling and foot is relatively low with some exceptions in the inner city. Notably, there are distinctions between both methods: cumulative opportunities illustrates a more optimistic potential interaction landscape for non-car modes, while the spatial availability measure demonstrates a theoretically more realistic spatial distribution of care destination availability of potential interaction. Neighbourhoods with both low spatial availability to care and a high proportion of low-income households are also identified and discussed as areas in need of intervention. The manuscript and analysis is computationally reproducible and openly available. The presented analysis demonstrates methods planners can use to apply a gender-aware lens to accessibility analysis. Further, results can inform policies aiming to encourage sustainable mobility.","PeriodicalId":48413,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport Geography","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport Geography","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.104050","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accessibility, the ease of interacting with potential opportunities, is an increasingly important tool among transport planners aiming to foster equitable and sustainable cities. However, in accessibility research there is a historical focus on employment destinations that is shaped by a masculinist transportation planning tradition. This paper aims to counter this gendered bias by connecting the Mobility of Care framework, a gender-aware transport planning conceptualisation to an empirical accessibility analysis of care destinations in the City of Hamilton, Canada. Care destinations are all the places one must visit to sustain household needs such shopping, errands, and caring for others. This paper considers access to care across different modes of transport at two travel time thresholds (trips shorter than 15-min and 30-min) using a curated care destination dataset. The accessibility methods used includes the cumulative opportunities measure and a competitive and singly-constrained accessibility measure (spatial availability) for different modes. Overall, results indicate that accessibility by car is exceptionally high across the city, while access by public transit, cycling and foot is relatively low with some exceptions in the inner city. Notably, there are distinctions between both methods: cumulative opportunities illustrates a more optimistic potential interaction landscape for non-car modes, while the spatial availability measure demonstrates a theoretically more realistic spatial distribution of care destination availability of potential interaction. Neighbourhoods with both low spatial availability to care and a high proportion of low-income households are also identified and discussed as areas in need of intervention. The manuscript and analysis is computationally reproducible and openly available. The presented analysis demonstrates methods planners can use to apply a gender-aware lens to accessibility analysis. Further, results can inform policies aiming to encourage sustainable mobility.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
11.50%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: A major resurgence has occurred in transport geography in the wake of political and policy changes, huge transport infrastructure projects and responses to urban traffic congestion. The Journal of Transport Geography provides a central focus for developments in this rapidly expanding sub-discipline.
期刊最新文献
Data-driven approach for assessing the impact of newly developed cycling infrastructure on cyclists' route choice The impact of shipping activities on air quality and residents' health in China's port cities Investigating scheduling of minibus taxis in South Africa's eventual electric paratransit Exploring mobility of care with measures of accessibility Understanding voluntary carlessness: Why outliers matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1