Tomoyuki Asada, Chad Z Simon, Atahan Durbas, Myles R J Allen, Kevin J DiSilvestro, Takashi Hirase, Patawut Bovonratwet, Nishtha Singh, Olivia Tuma, Kasra Araghi, Tejas Subramanian, Maximilian K Korsun, Joshua Zhang, Eric T Kim, Cole T Kwas, Annika Bay, Amy Z Lu, Eric Mai, Yeo Eun Kim, Avani S Vaishnav, James E Dowdell, Evan D Sheha, Sheeraz A Qureshi, Sravisht Iyer
{"title":"Influence of coronal lumbar Cobb angle and surgical level on short-segment lumbar surgery outcomes in degenerative scoliosis.","authors":"Tomoyuki Asada, Chad Z Simon, Atahan Durbas, Myles R J Allen, Kevin J DiSilvestro, Takashi Hirase, Patawut Bovonratwet, Nishtha Singh, Olivia Tuma, Kasra Araghi, Tejas Subramanian, Maximilian K Korsun, Joshua Zhang, Eric T Kim, Cole T Kwas, Annika Bay, Amy Z Lu, Eric Mai, Yeo Eun Kim, Avani S Vaishnav, James E Dowdell, Evan D Sheha, Sheeraz A Qureshi, Sravisht Iyer","doi":"10.1007/s00586-024-08599-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigates the relationship between surgical levels and coronal deformity to identify risk factors for failing to achieve a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) following short-segment isolated decompression or fusion surgery in patients with degenerative scoliosis (DS) and concurrent lumbar canal stenosis (LCS), without severe sagittal deformity malalignment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with degenerative scoliosis who underwent 1- or 2-level lumbar isolated decompression or fusion surgery were included. Surgical level was labeled as \"Cobb-related\" when decompression or surgical levels spanned or were between end vertebrae, and \"outside\" when the operative levels did not include the end vertebrae. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the factor associated with MCID achievement in ODI at 1 year postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 129 DS patients with LCS and preoperative ODI > 30 were included. At 1-year follow-up, 91 patients (70.5%) achieved MCID in ODI. No significant differences were found in demographics or overall spinal alignment between patients who did and did not achieve MCID. Logistic regression analysis revealed that Cobb-related decompression was independently associated with decreased odds of achieving MCID in ODI (adjusted Odds Ratio 0.18, 95% CI 0.42-0.79, P = 0.025).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with mild to moderate coronal deformity and minimal sagittal deformity, decompression alone at or across end vertebrae significantly lowers the likelihood of achieving the MCID in ODI compared to fusion surgery, with an 84% reduction in odds. No significant difference in MCID achievement was observed between decompression and fusion surgeries outside the Cobb angle.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"773-781"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11805618/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08599-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This study investigates the relationship between surgical levels and coronal deformity to identify risk factors for failing to achieve a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) following short-segment isolated decompression or fusion surgery in patients with degenerative scoliosis (DS) and concurrent lumbar canal stenosis (LCS), without severe sagittal deformity malalignment.
Methods: Patients with degenerative scoliosis who underwent 1- or 2-level lumbar isolated decompression or fusion surgery were included. Surgical level was labeled as "Cobb-related" when decompression or surgical levels spanned or were between end vertebrae, and "outside" when the operative levels did not include the end vertebrae. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the factor associated with MCID achievement in ODI at 1 year postoperatively.
Results: A total of 129 DS patients with LCS and preoperative ODI > 30 were included. At 1-year follow-up, 91 patients (70.5%) achieved MCID in ODI. No significant differences were found in demographics or overall spinal alignment between patients who did and did not achieve MCID. Logistic regression analysis revealed that Cobb-related decompression was independently associated with decreased odds of achieving MCID in ODI (adjusted Odds Ratio 0.18, 95% CI 0.42-0.79, P = 0.025).
Conclusion: In patients with mild to moderate coronal deformity and minimal sagittal deformity, decompression alone at or across end vertebrae significantly lowers the likelihood of achieving the MCID in ODI compared to fusion surgery, with an 84% reduction in odds. No significant difference in MCID achievement was observed between decompression and fusion surgeries outside the Cobb angle.
目的:本研究探讨手术水平与冠状畸形之间的关系,以确定在退行性脊柱侧凸(DS)合并并发腰椎管狭窄(LCS)患者行短节段孤立减压或融合手术后未能实现Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)最小临床重要差异(MCID)的危险因素,且无严重矢状畸形错位。方法:纳入行1节段或2节段腰椎分离减压或融合手术的退行性脊柱侧凸患者。当减压或手术水平跨越或位于末椎体之间时,手术水平被标记为“cobb相关”,当手术水平不包括末椎体时,手术水平被标记为“外部”。采用Logistic回归分析评估ODI术后1年实现MCID的相关因素。结果:共纳入129例伴有LCS的DS患者,术前ODI bb30。1年随访,91例(70.5%)ODI患者达到MCID。在实现和未实现MCID的患者之间,在人口统计学或总体脊柱对齐方面没有发现显著差异。Logistic回归分析显示,cobb相关减压与ODI患者实现MCID的几率降低独立相关(校正优势比0.18,95% CI 0.42-0.79, P = 0.025)。结论:在轻度至中度冠状畸形和轻度矢状畸形的患者中,与融合手术相比,单独在椎端或跨椎端减压可显著降低ODI中实现MCID的可能性,降低了84%的几率。Cobb角外减压和融合手术在MCID成就上无显著差异。
期刊介绍:
"European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts.
Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe