The Use of Methadone and Ketamine for Intraoperative Pain Management in Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1053/j.jvca.2024.11.019
Skye A. Buckner Petty MPH , Gwendolyn Raynor MD , Ricardo Verdiner MD, MPH , Elizabeth H. Stephens MD, PhD , Osezele Oboh BS , Tiffany Williams MD, PhD , Linda Shore-Lesserson MD , Adam J. Milam MD, PhD
{"title":"The Use of Methadone and Ketamine for Intraoperative Pain Management in Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study","authors":"Skye A. Buckner Petty MPH ,&nbsp;Gwendolyn Raynor MD ,&nbsp;Ricardo Verdiner MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Elizabeth H. Stephens MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Osezele Oboh BS ,&nbsp;Tiffany Williams MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Linda Shore-Lesserson MD ,&nbsp;Adam J. Milam MD, PhD","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2024.11.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate whether the addition of ketamine to intraoperative methadone is associated with superior postoperative pain management and decreased opioid consumption compared with methadone alone in cardiac surgery patients.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>A large academic medical system comprising four sites.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>A total of 6,856 patients who underwent cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass and received intraoperative methadone between 2018 and 2023 were included. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received both methadone and ketamine (Group M+K; n = 5,696) and those who received methadone alone (Group M; n = 1,160).</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Intraoperative administration of methadone with or without ketamine. Some patients also received additional opioids such as hydromorphone and fentanyl.</div></div><div><h3>Measurements and Main Results</h3><div>The primary outcomes were daily total oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) until postoperative day (POD) 7 and the time to first postoperative opioid administration. The secondary outcome was daily postoperative pain scores until POD 7. Exploratory outcomes included delirium and intensive care unit length of stay. The median time to first postoperative opioid administration was longer in Group M+K (7.2 hours) compared with Group M (5.0 hours) (hazard ratio = 0.88, 95% confidence interval: [0.82, 0.95]). Total OMEs were significantly lower in Group M+K on POD 0 (ß = –2.24; 95% confidence interval: [–3.2, –1.3]), with no significant differences beyond POD 0. No significant differences were found in pain scores or exploratory outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Adding ketamine to methadone prolonged the time to first opioid consumption postoperatively but showed no benefits beyond POD 0. Future studies should consider protocolized dosing to optimize pain control.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":"39 2","pages":"Pages 414-419"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053077024009182","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate whether the addition of ketamine to intraoperative methadone is associated with superior postoperative pain management and decreased opioid consumption compared with methadone alone in cardiac surgery patients.

Design

A retrospective cohort study.

Setting

A large academic medical system comprising four sites.

Participants

A total of 6,856 patients who underwent cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass and received intraoperative methadone between 2018 and 2023 were included. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received both methadone and ketamine (Group M+K; n = 5,696) and those who received methadone alone (Group M; n = 1,160).

Interventions

Intraoperative administration of methadone with or without ketamine. Some patients also received additional opioids such as hydromorphone and fentanyl.

Measurements and Main Results

The primary outcomes were daily total oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) until postoperative day (POD) 7 and the time to first postoperative opioid administration. The secondary outcome was daily postoperative pain scores until POD 7. Exploratory outcomes included delirium and intensive care unit length of stay. The median time to first postoperative opioid administration was longer in Group M+K (7.2 hours) compared with Group M (5.0 hours) (hazard ratio = 0.88, 95% confidence interval: [0.82, 0.95]). Total OMEs were significantly lower in Group M+K on POD 0 (ß = –2.24; 95% confidence interval: [–3.2, –1.3]), with no significant differences beyond POD 0. No significant differences were found in pain scores or exploratory outcomes.

Conclusions

Adding ketamine to methadone prolonged the time to first opioid consumption postoperatively but showed no benefits beyond POD 0. Future studies should consider protocolized dosing to optimize pain control.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在心脏手术中使用美沙酮和氯胺酮进行术中止痛:回顾性队列研究
目的:评价与单独使用美沙酮相比,在心脏手术患者术中加入氯胺酮是否与更好的术后疼痛管理和减少阿片类药物消耗有关。设计:回顾性队列研究。环境:一个由四个站点组成的大型学术医疗系统。参与者:在2018年至2023年期间,共有6856名接受心脏手术合并体外循环并术中接受美沙酮治疗的患者被纳入研究。患者分为两组:同时接受美沙酮和氯胺酮治疗的患者(M+K组;n = 5,696)和单独接受美沙酮治疗的患者(M组;N = 1160)。干预措施:术中给药美沙酮联合或不联合氯胺酮。一些患者还接受了额外的阿片类药物,如氢吗啡酮和芬太尼。测量和主要结果:主要结果为每日口服吗啡当量(OMEs)至术后第一天(POD) 7和术后第一次给药阿片类药物的时间。次要结局是术后每日疼痛评分,直到POD 7。探索性结果包括谵妄和重症监护病房的住院时间。与M组(5.0小时)相比,M+K组(7.2小时)至术后首次给予阿片类药物的中位时间更长(风险比= 0.88,95%可信区间:[0.82,0.95])。在POD 0上,M+K组总OMEs显著降低(ß = -2.24;95%置信区间:[-3.2,-1.3]),POD 0以上无显著差异。疼痛评分和探索性结果均无显著差异。结论:在美沙酮中加入氯胺酮延长了术后首次阿片类药物的使用时间,但没有超过POD 0的益处。未来的研究应考虑方案的剂量,以优化疼痛控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
17.90%
发文量
606
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia is primarily aimed at anesthesiologists who deal with patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic or vascular surgical procedures. JCVA features a multidisciplinary approach, with contributions from cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgeons, cardiologists, and other related specialists. Emphasis is placed on rapid publication of clinically relevant material.
期刊最新文献
To Be, or Not to Be: Is It Better to Be HFrEF or HFpEF or Somewhere In Between (HFmrEF)? Postoperative Liver Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation With Extracorporeal Life Support and 1-Year Mortality-A Cohort Study. Anesthetic and Surgical Management of Topsy-Turvy Heart: A Case Series Highlighting Cardiopulmonary and Airway Challenges. Advances in Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy. I. Cardiac Myosin Inhibitors. Comparative Analysis of Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheotomy and Surgical Tracheotomy in Critically Ill Patients: Outcomes and Complications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1