Participatory Development of an International Information Brochure on the Multimodal Assessment of Disorders of Consciousness

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Expectations Pub Date : 2024-12-13 DOI:10.1111/hex.70097
Melissa Hohl, Lina Willacker, Theresa Marie Raiser, Martin Justinus Rosenfelder, Katja Kuehlmeyer, Marta Bassi, Angela Comanducci, Chiara Valota, Jacobo Diego Sitt, Andreas Bender
{"title":"Participatory Development of an International Information Brochure on the Multimodal Assessment of Disorders of Consciousness","authors":"Melissa Hohl,&nbsp;Lina Willacker,&nbsp;Theresa Marie Raiser,&nbsp;Martin Justinus Rosenfelder,&nbsp;Katja Kuehlmeyer,&nbsp;Marta Bassi,&nbsp;Angela Comanducci,&nbsp;Chiara Valota,&nbsp;Jacobo Diego Sitt,&nbsp;Andreas Bender","doi":"10.1111/hex.70097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Disorders of consciousness (DoC) refers to a group of clinical conditions of altered consciousness. To improve their diagnosis and prognosis, multimodal assessment can be of great importance. Informal caregivers of people with DoC who are confronted with new technologies as such can benefit from interventions to expand their health literacy, i.e., the ability to use information to make health decisions for oneself and others.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We developed an information brochure on multimodal assessment for DoC in a participatory process, with decisions made by a steering group. The process was based on a methodological framework for the development of patient decision aids that built on the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>On the background of a broad variety of needs, the priority was to focus on the explanation of multimodal testing and provide information about its uncertainty. Its development aimed at enhancing informal caregivers' understanding of implications of results from multimodal assessment and its relevance for prognosis. It should avoid the portrayal of information that could lead to the impression of false hope or suboptimal rehabilitation care. Informal caregivers rated its usability and acceptability highly, though they preferred less technical language.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The participatory process was crucial to the project. Future studies should investigate the effectiveness of the brochure in fostering informal caregivers' health literacy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>Informal caregivers of people with DoC were deliberately included in the steering group and they participated in a field test of the prototype brochure.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"27 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11645296/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70097","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Disorders of consciousness (DoC) refers to a group of clinical conditions of altered consciousness. To improve their diagnosis and prognosis, multimodal assessment can be of great importance. Informal caregivers of people with DoC who are confronted with new technologies as such can benefit from interventions to expand their health literacy, i.e., the ability to use information to make health decisions for oneself and others.

Methods

We developed an information brochure on multimodal assessment for DoC in a participatory process, with decisions made by a steering group. The process was based on a methodological framework for the development of patient decision aids that built on the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS).

Results

On the background of a broad variety of needs, the priority was to focus on the explanation of multimodal testing and provide information about its uncertainty. Its development aimed at enhancing informal caregivers' understanding of implications of results from multimodal assessment and its relevance for prognosis. It should avoid the portrayal of information that could lead to the impression of false hope or suboptimal rehabilitation care. Informal caregivers rated its usability and acceptability highly, though they preferred less technical language.

Conclusion

The participatory process was crucial to the project. Future studies should investigate the effectiveness of the brochure in fostering informal caregivers' health literacy.

Patient or Public Contribution

Informal caregivers of people with DoC were deliberately included in the steering group and they participated in a field test of the prototype brochure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:意识障碍(DoC)是指一组意识改变的临床症状。为了改善诊断和预后,多模式评估具有重要意义。意识障碍患者的非正规护理人员在面对新技术时,可以从干预措施中获益,以提高他们的健康素养,即利用信息为自己和他人做出健康决定的能力:方法:我们通过一个参与式过程,为无行为能力者编制了一本关于多模式评估的信息手册,并由一个指导小组做出决定。该过程基于国际患者决策辅助标准(IPDAS)的患者决策辅助工具开发方法框架:结果:在广泛需求的背景下,优先重点是解释多模态检测并提供有关其不确定性的信息。其开发目的在于提高非正规护理人员对多模态评估结果的影响及其与预后相关性的理解。它应避免描述可能导致错误希望或次优康复护理印象的信息。非正规护理人员对手册的可用性和可接受性给予了很高的评价,尽管他们更喜欢技术性较低的语言:结论:参与过程对该项目至关重要。未来的研究应调查小册子在促进非正规护理人员健康知识普及方面的有效性:患者或公众的贡献:指导小组有意识地将门静脉高压症患者的非正规护理人员纳入其中,他们还参与了小册子原型的实地测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
期刊最新文献
Consensus on the Structure and Content of Birth Plans: A Modified Delphi Study Involving People With Lived Experience in Electronic Health Record Database Studies Reflections and Learning From the CHOOSE Study The Value of Clinical Prediction Models in General Practice: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Perspectives of People With Lived Experience of Depression and General Practitioners Causes, Solutions and Health Inequalities: Comparing Perspectives of Professional Stakeholders and Community Participants Experiencing Low Income and Poor Health in London Factors Influencing the Oral Health Behaviours of Autistic Children and Young People: A Qualitative Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1