Mobilizing the Power of Lived/Living Experiences to Improve Health Outcomes for all

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Expectations Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1111/hex.70212
Ambreen Sayani, Linda Monteith, Anam Shahil-Feroz, Diya Srinivasan, Isra Amsdr, Fatah Awil, Emily Cordeaux, Victoria Garcia, Ryan Hinds, Tara Jeji, Omar Khan, Bee Lee, Mursal Musawi, Jill Robinson, Staceyan Sterling, Dean Wardak, Kelly Wu, Mohadessa Khawari, Meghan Gilfoyle, Alies Maybee
{"title":"Mobilizing the Power of Lived/Living Experiences to Improve Health Outcomes for all","authors":"Ambreen Sayani,&nbsp;Linda Monteith,&nbsp;Anam Shahil-Feroz,&nbsp;Diya Srinivasan,&nbsp;Isra Amsdr,&nbsp;Fatah Awil,&nbsp;Emily Cordeaux,&nbsp;Victoria Garcia,&nbsp;Ryan Hinds,&nbsp;Tara Jeji,&nbsp;Omar Khan,&nbsp;Bee Lee,&nbsp;Mursal Musawi,&nbsp;Jill Robinson,&nbsp;Staceyan Sterling,&nbsp;Dean Wardak,&nbsp;Kelly Wu,&nbsp;Mohadessa Khawari,&nbsp;Meghan Gilfoyle,&nbsp;Alies Maybee","doi":"10.1111/hex.70212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Health Equity Assessments (HEAs) are decision-support frameworks or tools used to evaluate the equity impacts of policies, programmes and initiatives. However, HEAs are often conducted without meaningful engagement from the individuals and communities most affected by health inequities. This lack of social participation limits the relevance and effectiveness of HEAs, leaving systemic inequities unaddressed and opportunities for impactful change unrealized. An alternative is to involve people with diverse lived/living experiences in conducting and offering HEAs—so that people most impacted, and most excluded by decision-making can offer recommendations to improve the way they access and utilise care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Equity Mobilizing Partnerships in Community (EMPaCT) is a scalable, participatory citizen engagement model that integrates lived/living experiences into the HEA process. EMPaCT's Five Steps to a Community-Engaged Health Equity Assessment (CEn-HEA) was co-designed with community members typically excluded from decision-making. This process fosters psychological safety, trust-building, and power-sharing between underserved communities and decision-makers. The CEn-HEA systematically analyzes inequities across downstream (individual), midstream (community), and upstream (structural) levels to generate actionable, equity-focused recommendations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The EMPaCT CEn-HEA framework produces context-specific recommendations that address immediate project needs while advancing long-term, systemic change. The framework is a participatory process that centres community voices, builds trust, amplifies lived/living expertise, and fosters equity-driven decision-making that can lead to measurable improvements in healthcare policies, programmes, and practices.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In this paper, we examine the challenges and opportunities associated HEAs; introduce EMPaCT's CEn-HEA framework as a co-designed, innovative, and community-engaged approach to health equity analysis; and discuss methods for measuring and evaluating the health equity impacts of these efforts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>Patient and community involvement were central to the design, development and implementation of this project and resulting manuscript. Equity Mobilizing Partnerships in Community (EMPaCT), including its Community-Engaged Health Equity Assessment (CEn-HEA) framework, was co-created with diverse patient partners who have lived/living experiences of health inequities. In the preparation of this manuscript, patient partners were involved in codesign sessions to define the focus, structure and language of the manuscript. They collaborated in discussions to refine key concepts, articulate challenges and highlight solutions that are grounded in their lived realities. In the preparation of this manuscript, patient partners reviewed early drafts, contributed feedback to ensure accessibility and relevance of the content and shaped the actionable recommendations. This manuscript reflects EMPaCT's commitment to justice, inclusion and meaningful change.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"28 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70212","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70212","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Health Equity Assessments (HEAs) are decision-support frameworks or tools used to evaluate the equity impacts of policies, programmes and initiatives. However, HEAs are often conducted without meaningful engagement from the individuals and communities most affected by health inequities. This lack of social participation limits the relevance and effectiveness of HEAs, leaving systemic inequities unaddressed and opportunities for impactful change unrealized. An alternative is to involve people with diverse lived/living experiences in conducting and offering HEAs—so that people most impacted, and most excluded by decision-making can offer recommendations to improve the way they access and utilise care.

Methods

Equity Mobilizing Partnerships in Community (EMPaCT) is a scalable, participatory citizen engagement model that integrates lived/living experiences into the HEA process. EMPaCT's Five Steps to a Community-Engaged Health Equity Assessment (CEn-HEA) was co-designed with community members typically excluded from decision-making. This process fosters psychological safety, trust-building, and power-sharing between underserved communities and decision-makers. The CEn-HEA systematically analyzes inequities across downstream (individual), midstream (community), and upstream (structural) levels to generate actionable, equity-focused recommendations.

Results

The EMPaCT CEn-HEA framework produces context-specific recommendations that address immediate project needs while advancing long-term, systemic change. The framework is a participatory process that centres community voices, builds trust, amplifies lived/living expertise, and fosters equity-driven decision-making that can lead to measurable improvements in healthcare policies, programmes, and practices.

Conclusion

In this paper, we examine the challenges and opportunities associated HEAs; introduce EMPaCT's CEn-HEA framework as a co-designed, innovative, and community-engaged approach to health equity analysis; and discuss methods for measuring and evaluating the health equity impacts of these efforts.

Patient or Public Contribution

Patient and community involvement were central to the design, development and implementation of this project and resulting manuscript. Equity Mobilizing Partnerships in Community (EMPaCT), including its Community-Engaged Health Equity Assessment (CEn-HEA) framework, was co-created with diverse patient partners who have lived/living experiences of health inequities. In the preparation of this manuscript, patient partners were involved in codesign sessions to define the focus, structure and language of the manuscript. They collaborated in discussions to refine key concepts, articulate challenges and highlight solutions that are grounded in their lived realities. In the preparation of this manuscript, patient partners reviewed early drafts, contributed feedback to ensure accessibility and relevance of the content and shaped the actionable recommendations. This manuscript reflects EMPaCT's commitment to justice, inclusion and meaningful change.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
导言 健康公平评估(HEAs)是一种决策支持框架或工具,用于评估政策、计划和倡议对公平的影响。然而,在进行健康公平评估时,受健康不公平影响最严重的个人和社区往往没有进行有意义的参与。这种缺乏社会参与的情况限制了健康影响评估的相关性和有效性,使得系统性的不公平问题得不到解决,有影响的变革机会无法实现。另一种方法是让具有不同生活/生命经验的人参与开展和提供 HEA--这样,受决策影响最大和最受排斥的人就能提出建议,改善他们获取和利用医疗服务的方式。 社区公平动员伙伴关系方法(EMPaCT)是一种可扩展的参与式公民参与模式,它将生活/生命体验融入了 HEA 流程。EMPaCT 的 "社区参与健康公平评估(CEn-HEA)五步骤 "是与通常被排除在决策之外的社区成员共同设计的。这一过程促进了心理安全、信任的建立,以及得不到充分服务的社区与决策者之间的权力共享。CEn-HEA 系统分析了下游(个人)、中游(社区)和上游(结构)层面的不平等现象,以提出可操作的、注重公平的建议。 成果 EMPaCT CEn-HEA 框架提出了针对具体情况的建议,既能满足当前项目的需要,又能推动长期的系统性变革。该框架是一个参与式过程,它以社区的声音为中心,建立信任,放大生活/生命中的专业知识,并促进以公平为导向的决策,从而在医疗保健政策、计划和实践中实现可衡量的改进。 结论 在本文中,我们探讨了与健康教育相关的挑战和机遇;介绍了 EMPaCT 的 CEn-HEA 框架,作为一种共同设计、创新和社区参与的健康公平分析方法;并讨论了衡量和评估这些努力对健康公平影响的方法。 患者或公众的贡献 患者和社区的参与对本项目的设计、开发和实施以及由此产生的手稿至关重要。社区公平动员伙伴关系 (EMPaCT),包括其社区参与的健康公平评估 (CEn-HEA) 框架,是与有健康不公平生活/生命经历的不同患者伙伴共同创建的。在本手稿的编写过程中,患者伙伴参与了代码设计会议,以确定手稿的重点、结构和语言。他们在讨论中通力合作,完善关键概念,阐明挑战,并强调基于其生活现实的解决方案。在本手稿的编写过程中,患者伙伴们审阅了初稿,提供了反馈意见,以确保内容的可及性和相关性,并形成了可操作的建议。本手稿体现了 EMPaCT 对公正、包容和有意义的变革的承诺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
期刊最新文献
Mobilizing the Power of Lived/Living Experiences to Improve Health Outcomes for all Outpatient Virtual Care Among People Living With and Beyond Cancer From Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Backgrounds in Australia: A Protocol for a Realist Evaluation Under-Served Groups and Myalgic Encephalomyelitis Research Workshop; Multiple Barriers to Effective Healthcare, Research and Public Participation Artificial Intelligence in Medical Care – Patients' Perceptions on Caregiving Relationships and Ethics: A Qualitative Study Exploring Long Covid Prevalence and Patient Uncertainty by Sociodemographic Characteristics Using GP Patient Survey Data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1